This is a breaking change, but like the other changes to these
interfaces it should not matter to consumers of the API that don't
implement custom Recipients or Identities, which is all of them so far,
as far as I can tell.
It became clear working on plugins that we might want Recipient to
return multiple recipient stanzas, for example if the plugin recipient
is an alias or a group. The Identity side is less important, but it
might help avoid round-trips and it makes sense to keep things
symmetric.
The Type() method was a mistake, as proven by the fact that I can remove
it without losing any functionality. It gives special meaning to the
"0th argument" of recipient stanzas, when actually it should be left up
to Recipient implementations to make their own stanzas recognizable to
their Identity counterparts.
More importantly, there are totally reasonable Identity (and probably
Recipient) implementations that don't know their own stanza type in
advance. For example, a proxy plugin.
Concretely, it was only used to special-case "scrypt" recipients, and to
skip invoking Unwrap. The former can be done based on the returned
recipient stanza, and the latter is best avoided entirely: the Identity
should start by looking at the stanza and returning ErrIncorrectIdentity
if it's of the wrong type.
This is a breaking API change. However, we are still in beta, and none
of the public downstreams look like they would be affected, as they only
use Recipient and Identity implementations from this package, they only
use them with the interfaces defined in this package, and they don't
directly use the Type() method.