at-container-registry/pkg/billing/tier_resolution_test.go

//go:build billing

package billing

import (
	"encoding/json"
	"fmt"
	"net/http"
	"net/http/httptest"
	"strings"
	"testing"
	"time"

	"atcr.io/pkg/atproto"
	"github.com/bluesky-social/indigo/atproto/atcrypto"
	"github.com/stripe/stripe-go/v84"
)

// Tier resolution used to key on the price ID alone, which quietly inverted
// what a price change is supposed to do. Stripe prices are immutable, so
// raising a price means creating a new one, and Stripe never moves existing
// subscribers off the old one. Matching on price therefore dropped exactly the
// subscribers a price change is meant to leave untouched — and dropped them
// into the silent branch, where the event is answered 200, recorded as
// processed, and can never be redelivered.

func productPrice(priceID, productID string) *stripe.Price {
	p := &stripe.Price{ID: priceID}
	if productID != "" {
		p.Product = &stripe.Product{ID: productID}
	}
	return p
}

func tierTestConfig() *Config {
	return &Config{Tiers: []BillingTierConfig{
		{Name: "free"},
		{
			Name:               "supporter",
			StripeProduct:      "prod_supporter",
			StripePriceMonthly: "price_supporter_v2",
		},
		{
			Name:               "pro",
			StripePriceMonthly: "price_pro_only",
		},
	}}
}

// TestResolveTier_GrandfatheredPriceResolvesByProduct is the whole point of
// keying on the product: a subscriber still billing on price_supporter_v1,
// which no longer appears anywhere in the config, keeps their tier.
func TestResolveTier_GrandfatheredPriceResolvesByProduct(t *testing.T) {
	m := &Manager{cfg: tierTestConfig()}

	name, rank := m.resolveTier(productPrice("price_supporter_v1_retired", "prod_supporter"))
	if name != "supporter" || rank != 1 {
		t.Errorf("resolveTier(retired price, live product) = (%q, %d), want (\"supporter\", 1) — "+
			"a subscriber on the old price lost their tier", name, rank)
	}
}

// TestResolveTier_FallsBackToPriceWhenNoProductConfigured: a config written
// before stripe_product existed must keep resolving exactly as it did.
func TestResolveTier_FallsBackToPriceWhenNoProductConfigured(t *testing.T) {
	m := &Manager{cfg: tierTestConfig()}

	name, rank := m.resolveTier(productPrice("price_pro_only", "prod_pro_unconfigured"))
	if name != "pro" || rank != 2 {
		t.Errorf("resolveTier = (%q, %d), want (\"pro\", 2) — the price fallback stopped working", name, rank)
	}
}

// TestResolveTier_ProductWinsOverPrice: when both could match, the product
// decides. Otherwise a price ID left behind on the wrong tier could outvote the
// product and grant the wrong entitlement.
func TestResolveTier_ProductWinsOverPrice(t *testing.T) {
	m := &Manager{cfg: &Config{Tiers: []BillingTierConfig{
		{Name: "free"},
		{Name: "supporter", StripeProduct: "prod_supporter"},
		{Name: "pro", StripePriceMonthly: "price_shared"},
	}}}

	name, _ := m.resolveTier(productPrice("price_shared", "prod_supporter"))
	if name != "supporter" {
		t.Errorf("resolveTier = %q, want \"supporter\" — the price ID outvoted the product", name)
	}
}

// TestResolveTier_UnknownEverythingIsUnresolved keeps the negative honest: a
// price on a product the config has never heard of must not resolve to a tier.
func TestResolveTier_UnknownEverythingIsUnresolved(t *testing.T) {
	m := &Manager{cfg: tierTestConfig()}

	if name, rank := m.resolveTier(productPrice("price_unknown", "prod_unknown")); name != "" || rank != -1 {
		t.Errorf("resolveTier(unknown) = (%q, %d), want (\"\", -1)", name, rank)
	}
	if name, rank := m.resolveTier(nil); name != "" || rank != -1 {
		t.Errorf("resolveTier(nil) = (%q, %d), want (\"\", -1)", name, rank)
	}
}

// TestHandleSubscriptionChange_GrandfatheredSubscriberKeepsTier runs the same
// property through the real webhook path, so it covers the payload shape too:
// Stripe sends price.product as a bare ID string, and this fails if that is
// ever read wrongly.
//
// It asserts on the rank the managed hold is actually asked to apply. An
// earlier draft asserted that the event was recorded as processed, and passed
// against price-only resolution — because an unresolved tier ALSO records the
// event and returns nil. That is the defect itself, so any assertion it
// satisfies cannot be measuring the fix.
func TestHandleSubscriptionChange_GrandfatheredSubscriberKeepsTier(t *testing.T) {
	atproto.SetTestMode(true)
	t.Cleanup(func() { atproto.SetTestMode(false) })

	const secret = "whsec_grandfather_test"
	m, _ := newTestManager(t, secret)
	m.cfg.Tiers = tierTestConfig().Tiers

	stripeAPIReturning(t, http.StatusOK,
		`{"id":"cus_gf","object":"customer","metadata":{"user_did":"did:plc:grandfathered"}}`)

	type tierPush struct {
		UserDID  string `json:"userDid"`
		TierRank int    `json:"tierRank"`
	}
	pushes := make(chan tierPush, 4)
	hold := httptest.NewServer(http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
		var got tierPush
		_ = json.NewDecoder(r.Body).Decode(&got)
		pushes <- got
		w.WriteHeader(http.StatusOK)
	}))
	defer hold.Close()
	m.managedHolds = []string{"did:web:" + strings.ReplaceAll(
		strings.TrimPrefix(hold.URL, "http://"), ":", "%3A")}

	priv, err := atcrypto.GeneratePrivateKeyP256()
	if err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("generate key: %v", err)
	}
	m.privateKey = priv

	// price_supporter_v1_retired appears nowhere in the config. Only its
	// product does — this is the subscriber a price change left behind.
	payload := fmt.Sprintf(`{
		"id": "evt_grandfathered",
		"object": "event",
		"api_version": %q,
		"type": "customer.subscription.updated",
		"created": %d,
		"data": {"object": {
			"id": "sub_gf",
			"object": "subscription",
			"status": "active",
			"customer": "cus_gf",
			"items": {"object":"list","data":[{"price":{
				"id":"price_supporter_v1_retired",
				"product":"prod_supporter"
			}}]}
		}}
	}`, stripe.APIVersion, time.Now().Unix())

	if err := postWebhook(t, m, secret, []byte(payload)); err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("webhook: %v", err)
	}

	select {
	case got := <-pushes:
		if got.TierRank != 1 {
			t.Errorf("hold was asked for tierRank %d, want 1 (supporter)", got.TierRank)
		}
		if got.UserDID != "did:plc:grandfathered" {
			t.Errorf("hold was asked to update %q, want did:plc:grandfathered", got.UserDID)
		}
	case <-time.After(2 * time.Second):
		t.Fatal("no tier push reached the hold — the grandfathered subscriber's tier was never applied")
	}
}