mirror of
https://tangled.org/evan.jarrett.net/at-container-registry
synced 2026-09-02 08:16:57 +00:00
Evan JarrettandClaude Opus 5
ae1d7ba626
NarrowToPullOnly had no test. IsPullOnlyScope has a thorough one, but it only answers yes/no — NarrowToPullOnly rewrites the access list, so what it emits is what gets signed, and anonymous tokens skip the authgate entirely. Nothing downstream re-authorizes what this function decides to hand out. The load-bearing property is the allowlist: "pull" is the only action that can survive. Beyond the per-case assertions, every case re-checks that no other action reached the output, so a new case cannot accidentally assert its way past the property the function exists to hold. The wildcard cases are the point. A wildcard action means "any action" to distribution's actionSet.contains, so expanding "*" into "pull" is the single rewrite that would turn a wildcard request into a grant. Mutation-verified: * treat "*" as pull -> the three wildcard cases fail * stop narrowing the actions -> the four narrowing cases fail * trim the action slice in place -> DoesNotMutateInput fails That last one initially did NOT fail, and the fixture is why. The input had "pull" first, so an in-place trim writing "pull" into index 0 changed nothing observable and the test passed against the exact defect it was written for. "pull" is now deliberately not first, with a comment saying so, because the ordering is the whole instrument here. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SeaUS5AFPX9gqCahoLRMRh