Get rid of custom ExceptionRule methods

The only remaining methods on ExceptionRule after this are methods that
also exist on ExpectedException, which will allow us to, in the next CL,
swap out the one for the other and then run the automated refactoring to
turn it all into assertThrows/expectThrows.

Note that there were some assertions about root causes that couldn't
easily be turned into ExpectedException invocations, so I simply
converted them directly to usages of assertThrows/expectThrows.

-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=178623431

javatests/google/registry/tools/MutatingCommandTest.java

@@ -313,8 +313,8 @@ public class MutatingCommandTest {
             .build());
       }
     };
-    thrown.expect(
-        IllegalArgumentException.class, "Cannot apply multiple changes for the same entity");
+    thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
+    thrown.expectMessage("Cannot apply multiple changes for the same entity");
     command.init();
   }
 
@@ -326,9 +326,8 @@ public class MutatingCommandTest {
         stageEntityChange(host1, host2);
       }
     };
-    thrown.expect(
-        IllegalArgumentException.class,
-        "Both entity versions in an update must have the same Key.");
+    thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
+    thrown.expectMessage("Both entity versions in an update must have the same Key.");
     command.init();
   }
 
@@ -340,9 +339,8 @@ public class MutatingCommandTest {
         stageEntityChange(registrar1, registrar2);
       }
     };
-    thrown.expect(
-        IllegalArgumentException.class,
-        "Both entity versions in an update must have the same Key.");
+    thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
+    thrown.expectMessage("Both entity versions in an update must have the same Key.");
     command.init();
   }
 
@@ -354,9 +352,8 @@ public class MutatingCommandTest {
         stageEntityChange(host1, registrar1);
       }
     };
-    thrown.expect(
-        IllegalArgumentException.class,
-        "Both entity versions in an update must have the same Key.");
+    thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
+    thrown.expectMessage("Both entity versions in an update must have the same Key.");
     command.init();
   }
 
@@ -370,7 +367,8 @@ public class MutatingCommandTest {
     };
     command.init();
     persistResource(newHost1);
-    thrown.expect(IllegalStateException.class, "Entity changed since init() was called.");
+    thrown.expect(IllegalStateException.class);
+    thrown.expectMessage("Entity changed since init() was called.");
     command.execute();
   }
 
@@ -384,7 +382,8 @@ public class MutatingCommandTest {
     };
     command.init();
     persistResource(newHost1);
-    thrown.expect(IllegalStateException.class, "Entity changed since init() was called.");
+    thrown.expect(IllegalStateException.class);
+    thrown.expectMessage("Entity changed since init() was called.");
     command.execute();
   }
 
@@ -398,7 +397,8 @@ public class MutatingCommandTest {
     };
     command.init();
     persistResource(newHost1);
-    thrown.expect(IllegalStateException.class, "Entity changed since init() was called.");
+    thrown.expect(IllegalStateException.class);
+    thrown.expectMessage("Entity changed since init() was called.");
     command.execute();
   }
 
@@ -412,7 +412,8 @@ public class MutatingCommandTest {
     };
     command.init();
     deleteResource(host1);
-    thrown.expect(IllegalStateException.class, "Entity changed since init() was called.");
+    thrown.expect(IllegalStateException.class);
+    thrown.expectMessage("Entity changed since init() was called.");
     command.execute();
   }
 }