Several jars in our dependencies are now multi-release, including
dnsjava and snakeyaml, and a few more. Such jars include
jvm-version-specific classes that will only be loaded by the vm that can
handle them. All it takes is a new manifest attribute.
This change allows us to upgrade to dnsjava3.6+: the base (java 8) version of
this jar breaks java21. The correct manifest allows java21 to find the
classes it needs.
This single metric currently accounts for 22.2% of our total metrics bill,
almost double the size of our EPP requests metric, while also simultaneously
being much less useful. This change reduces the cardinality by removing two
parameters we don't care that much about, which should significantly reduce the
size and thus the cost. If after this change the metric is still too large, I'll
also then remove the matchCount parameter from this metric. We could possibly
even consider deleting the metric in its entirety, as we hardly ever use it.
This PR also removes unused code for premium list metrics that have never
actually been written out (and that we won't bother with at this point).
This will help us if/when we need to run the report generation multiple
times, or for past dates and we don't want to send extra emails or
upload any extra reports to ICANN.
Instead of having to parse the protoPayload.line from the request logs,
we just want to inspect the textPayload from the app logs (stored in a
separate table). This applies to the EPP metrics from the activity
reporting and the attempted-adds column for the transaction reporting.
Previous PRs and token changes (see b/332928676) have made it so that
SPECIFIED renewalPriceBehavior tokens must have a renewal price. As
such, we can now use that renewalPrice when creating domains with
SPECIFIED tokens.
It's valid for the auth data to be null (although it only happens 10 times
across our entire registry), so the domain update flow should not fail out with
a NullPointerException when the existing state of the data is null and the
update isn't adding that data either.
BUG=http://b/359264787
This is the first step in the field removal (second will be removing the
column from SQL once this is deployed).
There's no point in using a UserDao versus just doing the standard
loading-from-DB that we do everywhere else. No need to special-case it.
When creating/deleting users, we need to add/remove the emails in
question to/from the console email group (if it exists). This used to be
done synchronously by calling the Groups API directly from the nomulus
tool. However #2488 made it so that in all cases where group membership
is modified, a Cloud Tasks task is created to execute the change on
the server side asynchronously (because there are multiple places where
this change needs to be done, and it is easier to make it all happen on the
server side).
Alas, as it turns out, Cloud Tasks tasks need to be created with a
service account's credential (which is trivially done on the server side
because the ADC is a service account). Nomulus command runs with a user
credential, and we need to grant the relevant user permission to
masquerade as a service account, in order to enqueue tasks from the
nomulus tool. It is therefore easier to just revert to the old behavior.
Originally, we though that User entities were going to have mutable
email addresses, and thus would require a non-changing primary key. This
proved to not be the case. It'll simplify the User loading/saving code
if we just do everything by email address.
Obviously this doesn't change much functionality, but it prepares us for
removing the id field down the line once the changes propagate.
For instance, on sandbox this will allow us to remove our global roles
but keep roles to the CharlestonRoad admin registrar. Then, when we view
the console, it will be as if we were a registrar user.
This is consistent with how other registries are handling RDAP and is also consistent
with overall behavior in WHOIS and domain info flows as implemented in my previous
PRs #2477 and #2490.
* Check FeatureFlag in domain flows before checking contacts
Check if phase 1 has begun of the transition to the minimum registry dataset, and if it has, do not require the presence of contacts in domain flows.
* Add tests
* Small test fixes
* rename flag
* Fix merge conflicts
* Change todo
* Add isActive methods
* Add javadocs
* small fix
As requested, for registrars participating in these tiered pricing
promos that wish to receive this type of response, we make the following
changes:
1. The pre-promotional (i.e. base tier) price is returned as the
standard domain-create fee when running a domain check.
2. The promotional (i.e. correct) price is returned as a special custom
command class with a name of "STANDARD PROMO" when running a domain
check
3. Domain creates will return the non-promotional (i.e. incorrect) price
rather than the actual promotional price.
This PR does only number 3. See PR #2489 for the others.
As requested, for registrars participaing in these tiered pricing promos
that wish to receive this type of response, we make the following
changes:
1. The non-promotional (i.e. incorrect) price is returned as the
standard domain-create fee when running a domain check.
2. The promotional (i.e. correct) price is returned as a special custom
command class with a name of "STANDARD PROMO" when running a domain
check.
3. Domain creates will return the non-promotional (i.e. incorrect) price
rather than the actual promotional price. This is not implemented in
this PR.
Our logs are getting gummed up with an indefinitely failing and retrying task to
re-save a prober domain that doesn't exist (likely because it was hard-deleted
by delete prober data action), so this makes the re-save action resilient to
that failure case so that it stops assuming every enqueued re-save actually
corresponds to an entity that exists, thus allowing it to fail permanently if
the entity doesn't exist. Failing permanently is the right thing to do as if
the entity doesn't exist now there's no reason to think it will in the future,
plus all re-saves are optimistic rather than guaranteed anyway.
This should fix http://b/350530720
* Add registryTool commands for FeatureFlags
* Fix merge conflicts
* Add required parameters and inject mapper
* Use optionals in cache to negative cahe missing objects
* Fix spelling
* Change back to bulk load in cache
* Add FeatureName enum
* Change variable name
* Use FeatureName in main parameter
This doesn't yet allow them to be absent in EPP flows, but it should make the
code not break if they happen to be null in the database. This is a follow-up to
PR #2477, which ends up being a bit easier because whereas the registrant is
used in more parts of the codebase, the other contact types (admin, technical,
billing) are really only used in RDE, WHOIS, and RDAP, and because they were
already being used as a collection anyway, the handling for if that collection
contains fewer elements or is empty happened to already be mostly correct.
When using this token (which must be tied to a particular domain), the
first year price (and only the first year price, i.e. the creation
price) will be the standard price for this TLD. Future years (i.e.
renewals) will continue at the normal premium price.
This is the first step in migrating to the minimum registration data set. Note
that our database model already permits null domain registrants, so this just
makes the code accept it as well. Note that I haven't changed any requirements
in EPP flows yet; a later step will be to check the migration schedule and then
not require the registrant to be present if in a suitable state.
This does potentially affect the output of WHOIS/RDAP, but that's a NOOP so long
as EPP commands and other tools continue to enforce the requirement of a
registrant.
