This was added back in early 2018 long ago to enable promotions, but
since then (and for many years) we've added the ability to run
promotions on the tokens themselves, rather than relying on custom Java
classes.
This will make the changes for b/315504612 much easier, as that will
split up token validation into "is this token valid in general?" and "is
this token valid for this domain/action?"
This can potentially help even more with serializable transaction
failures (optimistic locking exceptions, which are expected to occur
somewhat frequently).
With six attempts, we will sleep at most five times, for
100+200+400+800+1600 ms each, for a total of at most 3.1 seconds (much
less than the EPP maximum which I believe (?) to be 30 seconds.
In addition, we add a 20% skew in an attempt to spread out
possibly-conflicting transaction retries.
This changes the code to only save console histories of this type. We
keep the old Java code (and, necessarily, the corresponding SQL code)
for now because there's no harm in doing so and we want to avoid hastily
deleting too much.
The SQL statement was incorrectly flooring to zero one layer too deep, which was
negating all negative transaction report rows (which occur most frequently when
a domain in the autorenew grace period is deleted). I've changed it so that it
now only floors to zero at the report level, which still solves the issue
reported in http://b/290228682 but whose original fix caused the issue
http://b/344645788
This bug was introduced in https://github.com/google/nomulus/pull/2074
I tested this by running the new query against the DB for 2024 Q4 using the
registrar that was having issues and confirmed that the total renewal numbers
for .app now match with the sum total of what we invoiced for the last three
months of 2024.
This removes logic from an inner helper method so that it becomes more clear
from callsites within each test exactly which behavior is expected from those
test conditions.
GKE logs are routed to a different dataset and the table is different.
The structs to look for are also different (jsonPayload vs textPayload
or protoPayload).
TESTED=Ran the resulting query in crash.
I obtained access to an IBM s390x VM so I thought I'd see how multi-arch
Nomulus is.
Our main application is in Java so it is already multi-arch, but several
tests use docker images that are by default x64. Luckily postgres has an
s390x port, but selenium does not. So I had to disable Screenshot tests
when the arch is not amd64.
This isn't a situation we'll encounter often, but if the client has an
allocation token that's valid for premium domains that gives a 0 cost,
we shouldn't require them to include the fee extension when creating the
domain. We already don't require it for standard domains.
We use this now for the DomainDeleteFlow in an attempt to figure out
what statements it's running (cross-referencing that with PSQL's own
statement logging to find slow statements).
This is kinda nonsensical because this use case is trying to apply a
single use token multiple times in the same domain:check request --
like, trying to use a single-use token for both create, renew, and
transfer while having a $0 create price and a premium renewal price.
This change doesn't affect any actual business / costs, since SPECIFIED
token renewal prices were already set on the BillingRecurrence
Instead of using a separate RenewalPriceInfo object, just map the
behavior (if it exists) onto the BillingRecurrence with a special
carve-out, as always, for anchor tenants (note: this shouldn't matter
much since anchor tenants *should* use NONPREMIUM renewal tokens anyway,
but just in case, double-check).
This also fixes DomainPricingLogic to treat a multiyear create as a
one-year-create + n-minus-1-year-renewal for cases where either the
creation or the renewal (or both) are nonpremium.
For now it only includes two options (domain deletion and domain
suspension). In the future, as necessary, we can add other actions but
this seems like a relatively simple starting point (actions like bulk
updates are much more conceptually complex).
We only include the deletion time if the domain is in the 5-day
PENDING_DELETE period after the 30 day REDEMPTION period. For all other
domains, we just have an empty string as that field.
This is behind a feature flag so that we can control when it is enabled
It was failing when any kind of transfer data was present, even completed
transfer data. Note that completed transfer data persists on a domain
indefinitely until/unless a new transfer is requested.
BUG= http://b/377328244
