Files
pinniped/test/integration/concierge_credentialissuer_test.go

96 lines
4.3 KiB
Go

// Copyright 2020-2025 the Pinniped contributors. All Rights Reserved.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
package integration
import (
"context"
"encoding/base64"
"testing"
"time"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
metav1 "k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/apis/meta/v1"
apiregistrationv1 "k8s.io/kube-aggregator/pkg/apis/apiregistration/v1"
conciergeconfigv1alpha1 "go.pinniped.dev/generated/latest/apis/concierge/config/v1alpha1"
"go.pinniped.dev/test/testlib"
)
func TestCredentialIssuer(t *testing.T) {
env := testlib.IntegrationEnv(t)
config := testlib.NewClientConfig(t)
client := testlib.NewConciergeClientset(t)
aggregatedClientset := testlib.NewAggregatedClientset(t)
ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), time.Minute)
defer cancel()
t.Run("test successful CredentialIssuer", func(t *testing.T) {
actualConfigList, err := client.
ConfigV1alpha1().
CredentialIssuers().
List(ctx, metav1.ListOptions{})
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Len(t, actualConfigList.Items, 1)
actualConfig := actualConfigList.Items[0]
for k, v := range env.ConciergeCustomLabels {
require.Equalf(t, v, actualConfig.Labels[k], "expected ci to have label `%s: %s`", k, v)
}
require.Equal(t, env.ConciergeAppName, actualConfig.Labels["app"])
apiService, err := aggregatedClientset.ApiregistrationV1().APIServices().Get(ctx, "v1alpha1.login.concierge."+env.APIGroupSuffix, metav1.GetOptions{})
require.NoError(t, err)
// work around stupid behavior of WithoutVersionDecoder.Decode
apiService.APIVersion, apiService.Kind = apiregistrationv1.SchemeGroupVersion.WithKind("APIService").ToAPIVersionAndKind()
// Verify the cluster strategy status based on what's expected of the test cluster's ability to share signing keys.
actualStatusStrategies := actualConfigList.Items[0].Status.Strategies
// There should be two. One of type KubeClusterSigningCertificate and one of type ImpersonationProxy.
require.Len(t, actualStatusStrategies, 2)
// The details of the ImpersonationProxy type is tested by a different integration test for the impersonator.
// Grab the KubeClusterSigningCertificate result so we can check it in detail below.
var actualStatusStrategy conciergeconfigv1alpha1.CredentialIssuerStrategy
for _, s := range actualStatusStrategies {
if s.Type == conciergeconfigv1alpha1.KubeClusterSigningCertificateStrategyType {
actualStatusStrategy = s
break
}
}
require.NotNil(t, actualStatusStrategy)
if env.HasCapability(testlib.ClusterSigningKeyIsAvailable) {
kubernetesAPIServerURLFromKubeconfig := config.Host
expectedServer := kubernetesAPIServerURLFromKubeconfig
if actualStatusStrategy.Frontend.TokenCredentialRequestAPIInfo.Server == "https://kind-control-plane:6443" {
// When our Kind clusters running in CI are on a VM with only an internal IP address,
// then the Kind cluster will not know its own hostname and will instead advertise kind-control-plane.
// This is okay, so adjust our expectation in this case.
expectedServer = "https://kind-control-plane:6443"
}
require.Equal(t, conciergeconfigv1alpha1.SuccessStrategyStatus, actualStatusStrategy.Status)
require.Equal(t, conciergeconfigv1alpha1.FetchedKeyStrategyReason, actualStatusStrategy.Reason)
require.Equal(t, "key was fetched successfully", actualStatusStrategy.Message)
require.NotNil(t, actualStatusStrategy.Frontend)
require.Equal(t, conciergeconfigv1alpha1.TokenCredentialRequestAPIFrontendType, actualStatusStrategy.Frontend.Type)
expectedTokenRequestAPIInfo := conciergeconfigv1alpha1.TokenCredentialRequestAPIInfo{
Server: expectedServer,
CertificateAuthorityData: base64.StdEncoding.EncodeToString(config.CAData),
}
require.Equal(t, &expectedTokenRequestAPIInfo, actualStatusStrategy.Frontend.TokenCredentialRequestAPIInfo)
} else {
require.Equal(t, conciergeconfigv1alpha1.ErrorStrategyStatus, actualStatusStrategy.Status)
require.Equal(t, conciergeconfigv1alpha1.CouldNotFetchKeyStrategyReason, actualStatusStrategy.Reason)
require.Contains(t, actualStatusStrategy.Message, "could not find a healthy kube-controller-manager pod (0 candidates): "+
"note that this error is the expected behavior for some cluster types, including most cloud provider clusters (e.g. GKE, AKS, EKS)")
}
})
}