From 9ab82cde1ebe26abfc07b73b55cf4db412e55611 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@ivarch.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2025 21:38:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Use the original info_aray size for comparison as the
 "control" structure may be made irrelevant here soon (#165).

---
 src/pv/watchpid.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/pv/watchpid.c b/src/pv/watchpid.c
index 42c3516..482020c 100644
--- a/src/pv/watchpid.c
+++ b/src/pv/watchpid.c
@@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ int pv_watchpid_scanfds(pvstate_t state,
 		 * nor estimated time of completion are displayed.
 		 */
 		info_array[use_idx].state->control.size = info_array[use_idx].size;
-		if (info_array[use_idx].state->control.size < 1) {
+		if (info_array[use_idx].size < 1) {
 			char *fmt;
 			while (NULL != (fmt = strstr(info_array[use_idx].state->control.default_format, "%e"))) {
 				debug("%s", "zero size - removing estimated time remaining");