Previous behaviour is preserved for query parameters way of requesting
the subscription. The new behaviour with the possibility to confirm
the email right away without a separate /email/confirm call is enabled
only with request params sent in the request body, which was not a thing
before 27fc339e, which was merged just now and is not part
of any tagged version yet.
I haven't found a linter for these, so I had to catch these manually.
I found #757 to fix one of these, and I thought it would be good
to fix everything at once.
Previously, the cache kept the entry and deletion of the parent comment
after child deletion was not possible for the rest
of cache life (5m) duration. Now it's possible to delete
a parent comment after the deletion of the child comment
by a user or admin.
Resolves#1481
As discovered in #1477, dashes are expected to work in the site ID
and do work everywhere but in email auth. That change makes
the behaviour consistent: site ID now allows dashes.
Previously it was sanitised using the HTML sanitiser,
but it had proven troublesome and unnecessary.
Remark42 rendered the markdown into proper HTML, but then some pieces
of it (like cited HTML code inside the code block, marked by backticks)
were cut out, which then showed the incorrect markdown to a user when
they were editing the comment.
For example, the comment "`foo<bar>`" became "foo" after sanitising,
and despite the proper render user saw only "foo" when editing
the comment.
After this change, the initial comment markdown is preserved unaltered.
It could contain dangerous HTML with JS, which I assume shouldn't
be a problem as it's never rendered as HTML but instead supposed
to be converted to HTML by the interpreter. In Remark42, it's stored
in a comment.Text field and sanitised and thus safe.
I've left information about the potential danger of rendering
the original markdown as-is without an interpreter in
all relevant places I could find.
Telegram authentication requires you to open a chat on the phone.
It's convenient to have a QR code for the case when you want to
log in on the computer but have Telegram only on your phone
and would be able to scan the QR instead of copy-pasting the link
from the computer to the phone any other way.
Originally we thought of generating QR on the client but found
backend-generated QR a better alternative because we avoid adding
one more JavaScript dependency to the frontend that way.
Previously it was done through writing bot first,
clicking a button, copying the token, and pasting
it into the web interface.
The new flow is way simpler: click the link
to write bot a message, then click the "Check"
button in the web UI and you got notifications
enabled.
That function returns an error in a never
expected condition, and that error would be
logged message on the caller side:
none of the callers handles it.
That change hides that error from the caller
so that function would have a signature that
better fit what it does and how it behaves.
Dmitry VerkhoturovandUmputun
Ruslan NagimovandUmputun
romanilchyshyn
Pavel MineevandUmputun