Fix printing alloc list block extents

The list alloc blocks have an array of blknos that are offset by a start
field in the block header.  The print code wasn't using that and was
always referencing the beginning of the array, which could miss blocks.

Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zab@versity.com>
This commit is contained in:
Zach Brown
2024-03-04 14:53:34 -08:00
committed by Auke Kok
parent 934f6c7648
commit 14b65c6360

View File

@@ -645,6 +645,8 @@ static int print_alloc_list_block(int fd, char *str, struct scoutfs_block_ref *r
u64 blkno;
u64 start;
u64 len;
u64 st;
u64 nr;
int wid;
int ret;
int i;
@@ -663,27 +665,37 @@ static int print_alloc_list_block(int fd, char *str, struct scoutfs_block_ref *r
AL_REF_A(&lblk->next), le32_to_cpu(lblk->start),
le32_to_cpu(lblk->nr));
if (lblk->nr) {
wid = printf(" exts: ");
start = 0;
len = 0;
for (i = 0; i < le32_to_cpu(lblk->nr); i++) {
if (len == 0)
start = le64_to_cpu(lblk->blknos[i]);
len++;
if (i == (le32_to_cpu(lblk->nr) - 1) ||
start + len != le64_to_cpu(lblk->blknos[i + 1])) {
if (wid >= 72)
wid = printf("\n ");
wid += printf("%llu,%llu ", start, len);
len = 0;
}
}
printf("\n");
st = le32_to_cpu(lblk->start);
nr = le32_to_cpu(lblk->nr);
if (st >= SCOUTFS_ALLOC_LIST_MAX_BLOCKS ||
nr > SCOUTFS_ALLOC_LIST_MAX_BLOCKS ||
(st + nr) > SCOUTFS_ALLOC_LIST_MAX_BLOCKS) {
printf(" (invalid start and nr fields)\n");
goto out;
}
if (lblk->nr == 0)
goto out;
wid = printf(" exts: ");
start = 0;
len = 0;
for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
if (len == 0)
start = le64_to_cpu(lblk->blknos[st + i]);
len++;
if (i == (nr - 1) || (start + len) != le64_to_cpu(lblk->blknos[st + i + 1])) {
if (wid >= 72)
wid = printf("\n ");
wid += printf("%llu,%llu ", start, len);
len = 0;
}
}
printf("\n");
out:
next = lblk->next;
free(lblk);
return print_alloc_list_block(fd, str, &next);