since we do not rely on FMT_DEPRECATED_OSTREAM to define the
fmt::formatter for us anymore, let's stop defining `FMT_DEPRECATED_OSTREAM`.
in this change,
* utils: drop the range formatters in to_string.hh and to_string.c, as
we don't use them anymore. and the tests for them in
test/boost/string_format_test.cc are removed accordingly.
* utils: use fmt to print chunk_vector and small_vector. as
we are not able to print the elements using operator<< anymore
after switching to {fmt} formatters.
* test/boost: specialize fmt::details::is_std_string_like<bytes>
due to a bug in {fmt} v9, {fmt} fails to format a range whose
element type is `basic_sstring<uint8_t>`, as it considers it
as a string-like type, but `basic_sstring<uint8_t>`'s char type
is signed char, not char. this issue does not exist in {fmt} v10,
so, in this change, we add a workaround to explicitly specialize
the type trait to assure that {fmt} format this type using its
`fmt::formatter` specialization instead of trying to format it
as a string. also, {fmt}'s generic ranges formatter calls the
pair formatter's `set_brackets()` and `set_separator()` methods
when printing the range, but operator<< based formatter does not
provide these method, we have to include this change in the change
switching to {fmt}, otherwise the change specializing
`fmt::details::is_std_string_like<bytes>` won't compile.
* test/boost: in tests, we use `BOOST_REQUIRE_EQUAL()` and its friends
for comparing values. but without the operator<< based formatters,
Boost.Test would not be able to print them. after removing
the homebrew formatters, we need to use the generic
`boost_test_print_type()` helper to do this job. so we are
including `test_utils.hh` in tests so that we can print
the formattable types.
* treewide: add "#include "utils/to_string.hh" where
`fmt::formatter<optional<>>` is used.
* configure.py: do not define FMT_DEPRECATED_OSTREAM
* cmake: do not define FMT_DEPRECATED_OSTREAM
Refs #13245
Signed-off-by: Kefu Chai <kefu.chai@scylladb.com>
in C++20, compiler generate operator!=() if the corresponding
operator==() is already defined, the language now understands
that the comparison is symmetric in the new standard.
fortunately, our operator!=() is always equivalent to
`! operator==()`, this matches the behavior of the default
generated operator!=(). so, in this change, all `operator!=`
are removed.
in addition to the defaulted operator!=, C++20 also brings to us
the defaulted operator==() -- it is able to generated the
operator==() if the member-wise lexicographical comparison.
under some circumstances, this is exactly what we need. so,
in this change, if the operator==() is also implemented as
a lexicographical comparison of all memeber variables of the
class/struct in question, it is implemented using the default
generated one by removing its body and mark the function as
`default`. moreover, if the class happen to have other comparison
operators which are implemented using lexicographical comparison,
the default generated `operator<=>` is used in place of
the defaulted `operator==`.
sometimes, we fail to mark the operator== with the `const`
specifier, in this change, to fulfil the need of C++ standard,
and to be more correct, the `const` specifier is added.
also, to generate the defaulted operator==, the operand should
be `const class_name&`, but it is not always the case, in the
class of `version`, we use `version` as the parameter type, to
fulfill the need of the C++ standard, the parameter type is
changed to `const version&` instead. this does not change
the semantic of the comparison operator. and is a more idiomatic
way to pass non-trivial struct as function parameters.
please note, because in C++20, both operator= and operator<=> are
symmetric, some of the operators in `multiprecision` are removed.
they are the symmetric form of the another variant. if they were
not removed, compiler would, for instance, find ambiguous
overloaded operator '=='.
this change is a cleanup to modernize the code base with C++20
features.
Signed-off-by: Kefu Chai <kefu.chai@scylladb.com>
Closes#13687
small_vector should be feature-wise compatible with std::vector<>,
let's add operator<=> for it.
also, there is not needd to define operator!=() explicitly, C++20
define this for us if operator==() is defined, so let's drop it.
Signed-off-by: Kefu Chai <kefu.chai@scylladb.com>
Closes#13032
Instead of lengthy blurbs, switch to single-line, machine-readable
standardized (https://spdx.dev) license identifiers. The Linux kernel
switched long ago, so there is strong precedent.
Three cases are handled: AGPL-only, Apache-only, and dual licensed.
For the latter case, I chose (AGPL-3.0-or-later and Apache-2.0),
reasoning that our changes are extensive enough to apply our license.
The changes we applied mechanically with a script, except to
licenses/README.md.
Closes#9937
1. Move tests to test (using singular seems to be a convention
in the rest of the code base)
2. Move boost tests to test/boost, other
(non-boost) unit tests to test/unit, tests which are
expected to be run manually to test/manual.
Update configure.py and test.py with new paths to tests.
