'"The issue is triggered by compaction of sstables of level higher than 0.
The problem happens when interval map of partitioned sstable set stores
intervals such as follow:
[-9223362900961284625 : -3695961740249769322 ]
(-3695961740249769322 : -3695961103022958562 ]
When selector is called for first interval above, the exclusive lower
bound of the second interval is returned as next token, but the
inclusivess info is not returned.
So reader_selector was returning that there *were* new readers when
the current token was -3695961740249769322 because it was stored in
selector position field as inclusive, but it's actually exclusive.
This false positive was leading to infinite recursion in combined
reader because sstable set's incremental selector itself knew that
there were actually *no* new readers, and therefore *no* progress
could be made."
Fixes #2908.'
* 'high_level_compaction_infinite_recursion_fix_v4' of github.com:raphaelsc/scylla:
tests: test for infinite recursion bug when doing high-level compaction
Fix potential infinite recursion when combining mutations for leveled compaction
dht: make it easier to create ring_position_view from token
dht: introduce is_min/max for ring_position
The issue is triggered by compaction of sstables of level higher than 0.
The problem happens when interval map of partitioned sstable set stores
intervals such as follow:
[-9223362900961284625 : -3695961740249769322 ]
(-3695961740249769322 : -3695961103022958562 ]
When selector is called for first interval above, the exclusive lower
bound of the second interval is returned as next token, but the
inclusivess info is not returned.
So reader_selector was returning that there *were* new readers when
the current token was -3695961740249769322 because it was stored in
selector position field as inclusive, but it's actually exclusive.
This false positive was leading to infinite recursion in combined
reader because sstable set's incremental selector itself knew that
there were actually *no* new readers, and therefore *no* progress
could be made.
Fix is to use ring_position in reader_selector, such that
inclusiveness would be respected.
So reader_selector::has_new_readers() won't return false positive
under the conditions described above.
Fixes#2908.
Signed-off-by: Raphael S. Carvalho <raphaelsc@scylladb.com>
"When we get two range tombstones with the same lower bound from
different data sources (e.g. two sstable), which need to be combined
into a single stream, they need to be de-overlapped, because each
mutation fragment in the stream must have a different position. If we
have range tombstones [1, 10) and [1, 20), the result of that
de-overlapping will be [1, 10) and [10, 20]. The problem is that if
the stream corresponds to a clustering slice with upper bound greater
than 1, but lower than 10, the second range tombstone would appear as
being out of the query range. This is currently violating assumptions
made by some consumers, like cache populator.
One effect of this may be that a reader will miss rows which are in
the range (1, 10) (after the start of the first range tombstone, and
before the start of the second range tombstone), if the second range
tombstone happens to be the last fragment which was read for a
discontinuous range in cache and we stopped reading at that point
because of a full buffer and cache was evicted before we resumed
reading, so we went to reading from the sstable reader again. There
could be more cases in which this violation may resurface.
There is also a related bug in mutation_fragment_merger. If the reader
is in forwarding mode, and the current range is [1, 5], the reader
would still emit range_tombstone([10, 20]). If that reader is later
fast forwarded to another range, say [6, 8], it may produce fragments
with smaller positions which were emitted before, violating
monotonicity of fragment positions in the stream.
A similar bug was also present in partition_snapshot_flat_reader.
Possible solutions:
1) relax the assumption (in cache) that streams contain only relevant
range tombstones, and only require that they contain at least all
relevant tombstones
2) allow subsequent range tombstones in a stream to share the same
starting position (position is weakly monotonic), then we don't need
to de-overlap the tombstones in readers.
3) teach combining readers about query restrictions so that they can drop
fragments which fall outside the range
4) force leaf readers to trim all range tombstones to query restrictions
This patch implements solution no 2. It simplifies combining readers,
which don't need to accumulate and trim range tombstones.
I don't like solution 3, because it makes combining readers more
complicated, slower, and harder to properly construct (currently
combining readers don't need to know restrictions of the leaf
streams).
Solution 4 is confined to implementations of leaf readers, but also
has disadvantage of making those more complicated and slower.
There is only one consumer which needs the tombstones with monotonic positions, and
that is the sstable writer.
Fixes #3093."
* tag 'tgrabiec/fix-out-of-range-tombstones-v1' of github.com:scylladb/seastar-dev:
tests: row_cache: Introduce test for concurrent read, population and eviction
tests: sstables: Add test for writing combined stream with range tombstones at same position
tests: memtable: Test that combined mutation source is a mutation source
tests: memtable: Test that memtable with many versions is a mutation source
tests: mutation_source: Add test for stream invariants with overlapping tombstones
tests: mutation_reader: Test fast forwarding of combined reader with overlapping range tombstones
tests: mutation_reader: Test combined reader slicing on random mutations
tests: mutation_source_test: Extract random_mutation_generator::make_partition_keys()
mutation_fragment: Introduce range()
clustering_interval_set: Introduce overlaps()
clustering_interval_set: Extract private make_interval()
mutation_reader: Allow range tombstones with same position in the fragment stream
sstables: Handle consecutive range_tombstone fragments with same position
tests: streamed_mutation_assertions: Merge range_tombstones with the same position in produces_range_tombstone()
streamed_mutation: Introduce peek()
mutation_fragment: Extract mergeable_with()
mutation_reader: Move definition of combining mutation reader to source file
mutation_reader: Use make_combined_reader() to create combined reader
When we get two range tombstones with the same lower bound from
different data sources (e.g. two sstable), which need to be combined
into a single stream, they need to be de-overlapped, because each
mutation fragment in the stream must have a different position. If we
have range tombstones [1, 10) and [1, 20), the result of that
de-overlapping will be [1, 10) and [10, 20]. The problem is that if
the stream corresponds to a clustering slice with upper bound greater
than 1, but lower than 10, the second range tombstone would appear as
being out of the query range. This is currently violating assumptions
made by some consumers, like cache populator.
One effect of this may be that a reader will miss rows which are in
the range (1, 10) (after the start of the first range tombstone, and
before the start of the second range tombstone), if the second range
tombstone happens to be the last fragment which was read for a
discontinuous range in cache and we stopped reading at that point
because of a full buffer and cache was evicted before we resumed
reading, so we went to reading from the sstable reader again. There
could be more cases in which this violation may resurface.
There is also a related bug in mutation_fragment_merger. If the reader
is in forwarding mode, and the current range is [1, 5], the reader
would still emit range_tombstone([10, 20]). If that reader is later
fast forwarded to another range, say [6, 8], it may produce fragments
with smaller positions which were emitted before, violating
monotonicity of fragment positions in the stream.
A similar bug was also present in partition_snapshot_flat_reader.
Possible solutions:
1) relax the assumption (in cache) that streams contain only relevant
range tombstones, and only require that they contain at least all
relevant tombstones
2) allow subsequent range tombstones in a stream to share the same
starting position (position is weakly monotonic), then we don't need
to de-overlap the tombstones in readers.
3) teach combining readers about query restrictions so that they can drop
fragments which fall outside the range
4) force leaf readers to trim all range tombstones to query restrictions
This patch implements solution no 2. It simplifies combining readers,
which don't need to accumulate and trim range tombstones.
I don't like solution 3, because it makes combining readers more
complicated, slower, and harder to properly construct (currently
combining readers don't need to know restrictions of the leaf
streams).
Solution 4 is confined to implementations of leaf readers, but also
has disadvantage of making those more complicated and slower.
Fixes#3093.
Default value for fwd is no so there's no need to pass it explicitly.
This is important because we will add additional parameter to
flat_mutation_reader_from_mutations in next patch.
Signed-off-by: Piotr Jastrzebski <piotr@scylladb.com>
The following patches contain fixes for skipping to the next parititon
in multi_range_reader and completelty dissable support for fast
forwarding inside a single partition, which is not needed and would only
add unnecessary complexity.
* https://github.com/pdziepak/scylla.git fix-multi_range_reader/v1:
flat_multi_range_mutation_reader: disallow
streamed_mutation::forwarding
flat_multi_range_mutation_reader: clear buffer on next_partition()
tests/flat_multi_range_mutation_reader: test skipping to next
partition
Using Materialized Views, if the base table has static columns,
and the update in base table mutates static and non static rows,
the streamed_mutation is stopped before process non static row.
The patch avoids stopping the stream_mutation and adds a test case.
Message-Id: <20171220173434.25091-1-tavares.george@gmail.com>
end_bound was not updated in one of the cases in which end and
end_kind was changed, as a result later merging decision using
end_bound were incorrect. end_bound was using the new key, but the old
end_kind.
Fixes#3083.
Message-Id: <1513772083-5257-1-git-send-email-tgrabiec@scylladb.com>
"Currently, compaction manager will serialize compaction of same size tier
(or weight) if they belong to the same column family. However, it fails to
do so if the compaction jobs belong to different column families.
That can lead to an ungodly amount of running compaction which gets worse
the higher the number of shards and active column families. The problem
is that it may affect overall system performance due to excessive resource
usage. It's easy to trigger it during bootstraping after loading node with
new sstables or repairing, or if lots of cfs are being actively written."
Fixes#1295.
* 'similar_sized_compaction_serialization_v4' of github.com:raphaelsc/scylla:
sstables: remove column_family from compaction_weight_registration
compaction_manager: serialize compaction of same size tier for different cfs
sstables: introduces deregister() and weight() to compaction_weight_registration
sstables: move compaction_weight_registration to its own header
sstables: improve compact_sstables() interface
