sprint() recently became more strict, throwing on sprint("%s", 5). Replace
with the more modern format().
Mechanically converted with https://github.com/avikivity/unsprint.
After the new in-memory representation of cells was introduced there was
a regression in atomic_cell_or_collection::operator<< which stopped
printing the content of the cell. This makes debugging more incovenient
are time-consuming. This patch fixes the problem. Schema is propagated
to the atomic_cell_or_collection printer and the full content of the
cell is printed.
Fixes#3571.
Message-Id: <20181024095413.10736-1-pdziepak@scylladb.com>
Currently timeout is opt-in, that is, all methods that even have it
default it to `db::no_timeout`. This means that ensuring timeout is used
where it should be is completely up to the author and the reviewrs of
the code. As humans are notoriously prone to mistakes this has resulted
in a very inconsistent usage of timeout, many clients of
`flat_mutation_reader` passing the timeout only to some members and only
on certain call sites. This is small wonder considering that some core
operations like `operator()()` only recently received a timeout
parameter and others like `peek()` didn't even have one until this
patch. Both of these methods call `fill_buffer()` which potentially
talks to the lower layers and is supposed to propagate the timeout.
All this makes the `flat_mutation_reader`'s timeout effectively useless.
To make order in this chaos make the timeout parameter a mandatory one
on all `flat_mutation_reader` methods that need it. This ensures that
humans now get a reminder from the compiler when they forget to pass the
timeout. Clients can still opt-out from passing a timeout by passing
`db::no_timeout` (the previous default value) but this will be now
explicit and developers should think before typing it.
There were suprisingly few core call sites to fix up. Where a timeout
was available nearby I propagated it to be able to pass it to the
reader, where I couldn't I passed `db::no_timeout`. Authors of the
latter kind of code (view, streaming and repair are some of the notable
examples) should maybe consider propagating down a timeout if needed.
In the test code (the wast majority of the changes) I just used
`db::no_timeout` everywhere.
Tests: unit(release, debug)
Signed-off-by: Botond Dénes <bdenes@scylladb.com>
Message-Id: <1edc10802d5eb23de8af28c9f48b8d3be0f1a468.1536744563.git.bdenes@scylladb.com>
As a prepratation for the switch to the new cell representation this
patch changes the type returned by atomic_cell_view::value() to one that
requires explicit linearisation of the cell value. Even though the value
is still implicitly linearised (and only when managed by the LSA) the
new interface is the same as the target one so that no more changes to
its users will be needed.
The assertions already have produces(mutation) and
produces(dht::decorated_key) overloads. Additional overload that accepts
a range of elements will allow to check if a range of mutations of
decorated keys is produced.
The same interface is exposed by mutation_reader_assertions.
produces(mutation_fragment::kind) is provided by
streamed_mutation_assertions and is going to be needed in order to
fully convert tests to the flat mutation readers.
Both fast_forward_to() overloads return a future which should be waited
for. Additionally, fast_forward_to(const dht::partition_range&) expects
the range to remain valid at least until the next call to
fast_forward_to(). The original mutation_reader_assertions guaranteed
that and so should flat_mutation_reader_assertions.
