Explicitly use up all the memory in the system as best as we can instead
Still not super reliable, but should have less side effects. And work better
with pre-allocated segment files
Explicitly use up all the memory in the system as best as we can instead
Still not super reliable, but should have less side effects. And work better
with pre-allocated segment files
Make production_snitch_base constructor signature consistent with
the rest of production snitches.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Zolotarov <vladz@cloudius-systems.com>
A non-empty default value of a configuration file name was preventing
the db::config::get_conf_dir() to kick in when a default snitch constructor
was used (this is the way it's always used from scylla).
Fixes issue #459
Signed-off-by: Vlad Zolotarov <vladz@cloudius-systems.com>
When building the in-memory schema for a column family, we were
ignoring compaction strategy class because of a bug in the
existing code. Example: suppose that you create a column family
with leveled compaction strategy. This option would be ignored
and the default strategy (size-tiered) would be used instead.
Found this problem while working on leveled compaction.
Signed-off-by: Raphael S. Carvalho <raphaelsc@cloudius-systems.com>
"This series cleans up a few places in the snitches
code that has been noticed during the work on issues #464
and #459.
The last patch actually fixes the issue #464"
Make production_snitch_base constructor signature consistent with
the rest of production snitches.
Signed-off-by: Vlad Zolotarov <vladz@cloudius-systems.com>
A non-empty default value of a configuration file name was preventing
the db::config::get_conf_dir() to kick in when a default snitch constructor
was used (this is the way it's always used from scylla).
Fixes issue #459
Signed-off-by: Vlad Zolotarov <vladz@cloudius-systems.com>
When building the in-memory schema for a column family, we were
ignoring compaction strategy class because of a bug in the
existing code. Example: suppose that you create a column family
with leveled compaction strategy. This option would be ignored
and the default strategy (size-tiered) would be used instead.
Found this problem while working on leveled compaction.
Signed-off-by: Raphael S. Carvalho <raphaelsc@cloudius-systems.com>
After the previous two patches, the CF directory where the SSTable will live is
guaranteed to always exist: system CFs' are touched at boot while newly created
tables' are touched when the creation mutations are announced.
With that in place, there is no more need for the recursive touch in the
SSTables path.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@scylladb.com>
In Cassandra, when you create a new column family, a directory for it
immediately appears under the KS directory.
In the past, we have made a decision to delay that creation until the first
SSTable is created, which works well in general.
There is a problem, however, for backup restoration: the standard procedure to
call loadNewSSTables is to do that in an empty directory. But the directory
simply won't be there until we create the first SSTable: bummer!
In the current incarnation of the code in schema_tables.cc, there is already
some code that runs on CPU0 only. That is a perfect place for the directory
creation. So let's do it.
After this patch, a directory for the CF appears right after the CF creation.
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@scylladb.com>
Current code calls make_directory, which will fail if the directory already exists.
We didn't use this code path much before, but once we start creating CF directories
on CF creation - and not on SSTable creation, that will become our default method.
Use touch_directory instead
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@scylladb.com>
Adapt our compaction code to start writing a new sstable if the
one being written reached its maximum size. Leveled strategy works
with that concept. If a strategy other than leveled is being used,
everything will work as before.
Signed-off-by: Raphael S. Carvalho <raphaelsc@cloudius-systems.com>
