gcc 4.9 complains about the type{ val, val } construction of
type with implicit default constructor, i.e. member = initial
declarations. gcc 5 does not (and possibly rightly so).
However, we still (implicitly) claim to support gcc 4.9 so
why not just change this particular instance.
Message-Id: <1454921328-1106-1-git-send-email-calle@scylladb.com>