This change fixes#17237, fixes#5361 and fixes#5362 by passing the limit value down the call chain in cql3. A test is also added.
fixes#17237fixes#5361fixes#5362
The regression happened in 5.4 as we changed the way GROUP BY is processed in 432cb02 - to force aggregation when it is used. The LIMIT value was not passed to aggregations and thus we failed to adhere to it.
W want to backport this fix to 5.4 and 6.0 to have continuous correct results for the test case from #17237
This patch consists of 4 commits:
- fa4225ea0fac2057b7a9976f57dc06bcbd900cd4 - cql3: respect the user-defined page size in aggregate queries - a precondition for this patch to be implementable
- 8fbe69e74dca16ed8832d9a90489ca47ba271d0b - cql3/select_statement: simplify the get_limit function - the `do_get_limit()` function did a lot of legwork that should not be associated with it. This change makes it trivial and makes its callers do additional checks (for unset guards, or for an aggregate query)
- 162828194a2b88c22fbee335894ff045dcc943c9 - cql3: process LIMIT for GROUP BY queries - pass the limit value down the chain and make use of it. This is the actual fix to #17237
- b3dc6de6d6cda8f5c09b01463bb52f827a6a00b4 - test/cql-pytest: Add test for GROUP BY queries with LIMIT - tests
Closesscylladb/scylladb#18842
* github.com:scylladb/scylladb:
test/cql-pytest: Add test for GROUP BY queries with LIMIT
cql3: process LIMIT for GROUP BY queries
cql3/select_statement: simplify the get_limit function
cql3: respect the user-defined page size in aggregate queries
3de4e8f91b