View building from staging creates a reader from scratch (memtable
\+ sstables - staging) for every partition, in order to calculate
the diff between new staging data and data in base sstable set,
and then pushes the result into the view replicas.
perf shows that the reader creation is very expensive:
```
+ 12.15% 10.75% reactor-3 scylla [.] lexicographical_tri_compare<compound_type<(allow_prefixes)0>::iterator, compound_type<(allow_prefixes)0>::iterator, legacy_compound_view<compound_type<(allow_prefixes)0> >::tri_comparator::operator()(managed_bytes_basic_view<(mutable_view)0>, managed_bytes
+ 10.01% 9.99% reactor-3 scylla [.] boost::icl::is_empty<boost::icl::continuous_interval<compatible_ring_position_or_view, std::less> >
+ 8.95% 8.94% reactor-3 scylla [.] legacy_compound_view<compound_type<(allow_prefixes)0> >::tri_comparator::operator()
+ 7.29% 7.28% reactor-3 scylla [.] dht::ring_position_tri_compare
+ 6.28% 6.27% reactor-3 scylla [.] dht::tri_compare
+ 4.11% 3.52% reactor-3 scylla [.] boost::icl::interval_base_map<boost::icl::interval_map<compatible_ring_position_or_view, std::unordered_set<seastar::lw_shared_ptr<sstables::sstable>, std::hash<seastar::lw_shared_ptr<sstables::sstable> >, std::equal_to<seastar::lw_shared_ptr<sstables::sst+ 4.09% 4.07% reactor-3 scylla [.] sstables::index_consume_entry_context<sstables::index_consumer>::process_state
+ 3.46% 0.93% reactor-3 scylla [.] sstables::sstable_run::will_introduce_overlapping
+ 2.53% 2.53% reactor-3 libstdc++.so.6 [.] std::_Rb_tree_increment
+ 2.45% 2.45% reactor-3 scylla [.] boost::icl::non_empty::exclusive_less<boost::icl::continuous_interval<compatible_ring_position_or_view, std::less> >
+ 2.14% 2.13% reactor-3 scylla [.] boost::icl::exclusive_less<boost::icl::continuous_interval<compatible_ring_position_or_view, std::less> >
+ 2.07% 2.07% reactor-3 scylla [.] logalloc::region_impl::free
+ 2.06% 1.91% reactor-3 scylla [.] sstables::index_consumer::consume_entry(sstables::parsed_partition_index_entry&&)::{lambda()https://github.com/scylladb/scylladb/issues/1}::operator()() const::{lambda()https://github.com/scylladb/scylladb/issues/1}::operator()
+ 2.04% 2.04% reactor-3 scylla [.] boost::icl::interval_base_map<boost::icl::interval_map<compatible_ring_position_or_view, std::unordered_set<seastar::lw_shared_ptr<sstables::sstable>, std::hash<seastar::lw_shared_ptr<sstables::sstable> >, std::equal_to<seastar::lw_shared_ptr<sstables::sst+ 1.87% 0.00% reactor-3 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
+ 1.86% 0.00% reactor-3 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] do_syscall_64
+ 1.39% 1.38% reactor-3 libc.so.6 [.] __memcmp_avx2_movbe
+ 1.37% 0.92% reactor-3 scylla [.] boost::icl::segmental::join_left<boost::icl::interval_map<compatible_ring_position_or_view, std::unordered_set<seastar::lw_shared_ptr<sstables::sstable>, std::hash<seastar::lw_shared_ptr<sstables::sstable> >, std::equal_to<seastar::lw_shared_ptr<sstables::
+ 1.34% 1.33% reactor-3 scylla [.] logalloc::region_impl::alloc_small
+ 1.33% 1.33% reactor-3 scylla [.] seastar::memory::small_pool::add_more_objects
+ 1.30% 0.35% reactor-3 scylla [.] seastar::reactor::do_run
+ 1.29% 1.29% reactor-3 scylla [.] seastar::memory::allocate
+ 1.19% 0.05% reactor-3 libc.so.6 [.] syscall
+ 1.16% 1.04% reactor-3 scylla [.] boost::icl::interval_base_map<boost::icl::interval_map<compatible_ring_position_or_view, std::unordered_set<seastar::lw_shared_ptr<sstables::sstable>, std::hash<seastar::lw_shared_ptr<sstables::sstable> >, std::equal_to<seastar::lw_shared_ptr<sstables::sst
+ 1.07% 0.79% reactor-3 scylla [.] sstables::partitioned_sstable_set::insert
```
That shows some significant amount of work for inserting sstables
into the interval map and maintaining the sstable run (which sorts
fragments by first key and checks for overlapping).
The interval map is known for having issues with L0 sstables, as
it will have to be replicated almost to every single interval
stored by the map, causing terrible space and time complexity.
With enough L0 sstables, it can fall into quadratic behavior.
This overhead is fixed by not building a new fresh sstable set
when recreating the reader, but rather supplying a predicate
to sstable set that will filter out staging sstables when
creating either a single-key or range scan reader.
This could have another benefit over today's approach which
may incorrectly consider a staging sstable as non-staging, if
the staging sst wasn't included in the current batch for view
building.
With this improvement, view building was measured to be 3x faster.
from
`INFO 2023-06-16 12:36:40,014 [shard 0] view_update_generator - Processed keyspace1.standard1: 5 sstables in 963957ms = 50kB/s`
to
`INFO 2023-06-16 14:47:12,129 [shard 0] view_update_generator - Processed keyspace1.standard1: 5 sstables in 319899ms = 150kB/s`
Refs https://github.com/scylladb/scylladb/issues/14089.
Fixes scylladb/scylladb#14244.
Closes#14364
* github.com:scylladb/scylladb:
table: Optimize creation of reader excluding staging for view building
view_update_generator: Dump throughput and duration for view update from staging
utils: Extract pretty printers into a header
f5e3b8df6d