It turns out that there is a difference between how Scylla and Cassandra
handle multiple restrictions on the same column - for example "WHERE
c = 0 and c >0". Cassandra treats all such cases as invalid queries,
whereas Scylla *allows* them.
This test demonstrates this difference (it is marked "scylla_only"
because it's a Scylla-only feature), and also verifies that the results
of such queries on Scylla are correct - i.e., if the two restrictions
conflict the result is empty, and if the two restrictions overlap,
the result can be non-empty.
The test passes, verifying that although Scylla differs from Cassandra
on this, its behavior is correct.
Signed-off-by: Nadav Har'El <nyh@scylladb.com>
Message-Id: <20220512165107.644932-1-nyh@scylladb.com>
c51a41a885