before this change, we create a new UUID for a new sstable managed
by the s3_storage, and we use the string representation of UUID
defined by RFC4122 like "0aa490de-7a85-46e2-8f90-38b8f496d53b" for
naming the objects stored on s3_storage. but this representation is
not what we are using for storing sstables on local filesystem when
the option of "uuid_sstable_identifiers_enabled" is enabled. instead,
we are using a base36-based representation which is shorter.
to be consistent with the naming of the sstables created for local
filesystem, and more importantly, to simplify the interaction between
the local copy of sstables and those stored on object storage, we should
use the same string representation of the sstable identifier.
so, in this change:
1. instead of creating a new UUID, just reuse the generation of the
sstable for the object's key.
2. do not store the uuid in the sstable_registry system table. As
we already have the generation of the sstable for the same purpose.
3. switch the sstable identifier representation from the one defined
by the RFC4122 (implemented by fmt::formatter<utils::UUID>) to the
base36-based one (implemented by
fmt::formatter<sstables::generation_type>)
4. enable the `uuid_sstable_identifers` cluster feature if it is
enabled in the `test_env_config`, so that it the sstable manager
can enable the uuid-based uuid when creating a new uuid for
sstable.
5. throw if the generation of sstable is not UUID-based when
accessing / manipulating an sstable with S3 storage backend. as
the S3 storage backend now relies on this option. as, otherwise
we'd have sstables with key like s3://bucket/number/basename, which
is just unable to serve as a unique id for sstable if the bucket is
shared across multiple tables.
Fixes#14175
Signed-off-by: Kefu Chai <kefu.chai@scylladb.com>
af8bc8ba63