After 8014c7124, cleanup can potentially pick a compacting SSTable.
Upgrade and scrub can also pick a compacting SSTable.
The problem is that table::candidates_for_compaction() was badly named.
It misleads the user into thinking that the SSTables returned are perfect
candidates for compaction, but manager still need to filter out the
compacting SSTables from the returned set. So it's being renamed.
When the same SSTable is compacted in parallel, the strategy invariant
can be broken like overlapping being introduced in LCS, and also
some deletion failures as more than one compaction process would try
to delete the same files.
Let's fix scrub, cleanup and ugprade by calling the manager function
which gets the correct candidates for compaction.
Fixes#6938.
Signed-off-by: Raphael S. Carvalho <raphaelsc@scylladb.com>
Message-Id: <20200811200135.25421-1-raphaelsc@scylladb.com>
(cherry picked from commit 11df96718a)
c03445871a