mirror of
https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs.git
synced 2026-08-20 14:17:07 +00:00
0de7ff5eb8fa00a2cd0e5b748259b41b83348390
7
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
  Chris LuandGitHub
|
a7d5443125 |
ec: confirm a surviving copy before deleting a duplicate EC shard (#10719)
* ec: confirm a surviving copy before deleting a duplicate EC shard The dedup phase of EC balancing removes a shard it believes exists elsewhere. It copies nothing first, so the shard surviving on another node is the only thing that makes the delete safe -- and it took the plan's word for that. The plan is built from the master's topology, which can name a location that holds nothing: such a server answers "CopyFile not found ec volume id N" when something later tries to read the shard there. A shard listed on a phantom location and on a real one looks duplicated, so dedup deletes one of them. When it picks the real one the last copy is gone, and the job reports success -- the loss only surfaces later, as a rebuild that cannot assemble enough shards. The move phase already refuses to work on trust: it verifies the shard registered on the destination before removing the source. Dedup now holds to the same standard. The planner records which node it chose to keep, and both executors -- the worker task and the shell's ec.balance -- confirm that node really holds the shard before deleting. A keep node that cannot be queried is unknown rather than confirmed, and blocks the delete. Tests drive the destructive path against an in-process volume server that tracks what is actually on disk separately from what the plan claims, which is the distinction the bug turns on. Without the guard, two of them fail by deleting the only copy and returning success. * ec: check the collection and bound the wait when confirming a survivor Two gaps in the dedup survivor check. The inventory RPC is keyed by volume id alone, so a server holding the same number for a different collection answers "yes, I have that shard" to a question about this one. Accepting that deletes the last real copy on the strength of an unrelated volume. The response already carries the collection, so verify against it rather than widening the RPC. The shell path also queried on a background context, so a keep node that accepts the connection but never answers would hang the whole balance run instead of reporting that the survivor could not be confirmed. Bound it. The check moves into VerifyShardsOnServer next to the existing helper, shared by both executors, so the two paths cannot drift. |
||
|
Chris LuandGitHub
|
bea1357d38 |
ec: skip physically near-full disks when placing EC shards (#10167)
EC placement scored destinations purely by free EC shard slots (derived from maxVolumeCount) and shard counts, blind to real disk fullness — the same defect as volume balancing. A disk that is physically full but still shows free EC slots kept being chosen, and EC shard bytes are captured by statfs free space yet not by any slot accounting, so the slot math is exactly the metric that can't see EC fullness. Treat a disk at/above 90% physical usage as having zero free EC slots at snapshot-build time, so every existing freeSlots>0 placement predicate excludes it. Applied in all three snapshot builders (shell countFreeShardSlots, the shared ecbalancer FromActiveTopology, and the worker ec_balance buildBalancerTopology) via the shared balancer.DiskTooFullAfter gate. Servers not reporting disk bytes fall back to slot-only behavior. ec.rebuild recovery is left ungated so shard recovery can still complete onto fuller disks. |
||
|
Chris LuandGitHub
|
7e608c877a |
refactor(ec_balance): make the balance planner per-volume ratio-capable (#9960)
* refactor(ec_balance): make the balance planner per-volume ratio-capable Thread a per-volume EC ratio through the balance planner: Plan resolves each volume's data/parity from a new Options.VolumeRatio (falling back to the collection Ratio, then the build default, when it reports 0), and keys the global phase's ratio maps by volume instead of collection. The shell and worker balance paths build the per-volume lookup from each shard's heartbeat via the new ecbalancer.VolumeShardRatio. In OSS this is behavior-preserving: VolumeShardRatio returns 0 because the per-volume data_shards/parity_shards heartbeat fields are an enterprise feature, so every volume falls back to the collection ratio -- the existing standard-scheme behavior. The refactor keeps the shared planner in sync with the enterprise fork, which overrides VolumeShardRatio to classify and spread a mixed-ratio collection by each volume's own data/parity split. * perf(ec_balance): hoist the collection ratio out of the per-volume loop The collection ratio is constant for every volume in a collection, so resolve it once per collection instead of per volume; a custom Ratio func may do map lookups or locking. Addresses a review comment. |
||
|
Chris LuandGitHub
|
f9d3105e80 |
ec placement: spread EC shards evenly across machines, not onto the lowest-id one (#9855)
* ec placement: steer shards to less-loaded machines, not the lowest id EC encode places every volume against one shared topology snapshot (it reserves the shards it assigns so later volumes see reduced capacity), but node selection ranked only by this volume's shard count and broke ties by sorted id. So the lowest-id machine won the first shard of every volume and accumulated far more total shards than the rest -- on a 6-machine cluster the first machines drifted to ~1.5x. Rank eligible nodes by the machine's shards of this volume, then the machine's free capacity, then the node's shards of this volume, then the node's free capacity. Free capacity reflects the load already placed, so ties steer toward the least-loaded machine instead of the lowest id, keeping total EC shards even across machines. * test: ec.balance converges to even per-machine load from a skew Starts machine 10.0.0.1 at 4 shards/volume and the rest at 2, then runs repeated worker-style capped passes; asserts convergence to an even per-machine total (reaches exactly even in ~13 rounds). * reduce comments on the placement fix Trim narration to the non-obvious why. * test: assert convergence and count zero-shard machines Seed the per-machine map with every host so a fully drained machine still registers, and fail explicitly if balance doesn't converge before the round cap. |
||
|
Chris LuandGitHub
|
f0d2a0d417 |
Treat co-located volume servers as one fault domain when balancing and allocating (#9854)
* admin/topology: carry the volume server address on DiskInfo The planning DiskInfo exposed only the node id, which can be an opaque label rather than ip:port. Record the address too so callers can resolve the physical machine a disk sits on. * ec.balance: spread a volume's shards across machines, not just nodes Volume servers sharing a host are one fault domain, but the within-rack spread treated them as independent nodes, so one box could end up holding more shards of a volume than EC can afford to lose. Add a machine (host) tier between rack and node: the within-rack pass spreads each volume across machines, and the global load phase no longer re-concentrates a volume onto a machine it already sits on. Host defaults to the node id, so clusters with one server per host are unchanged. * ec placement: prefer machines holding fewer of a volume's shards EC allocation and repair picked the least-loaded node in a rack with no regard for which physical machine it sits on, so a volume's shards could pile onto several servers of one box. Rank candidate nodes by their machine's shard count first, then the node's own. The machine is derived from the volume server address carried on DiskInfo, falling back to the node id, matching how the balancer resolves it. * volume.balance: don't move a replica onto a machine already holding one isGoodMove only rejected a move onto the same data node, so two replicas could land on two volume servers of one box and a single machine failure would lose both. Reject a target whose host already holds another replica of the volume. Best-effort: balancing simply skips and tries the next target. * volume allocation: spread same-rack replicas across machines PickNodesByWeight filled the same-rack replica picks by weight alone, so replicas could co-locate on one box. Prefer candidates on not-yet-used hosts, falling back when too few distinct machines exist. Data-center and rack tiers have no host, so their ordering is unchanged. * ec.balance: harden machine spread against re-concentration and capped machines Two cases where the machine-aware spread could still leave a volume badly placed: - The global load phase could move a shard of a volume onto a machine that already held it, raising that machine's count and undoing the within-rack spread (a 4/4/3/3 layout could become 3/5/3/3, past parity for 10+4). Limit the load-only fallback to same-machine moves, which leave a machine's count unchanged; cross-machine concentration is no longer allowed for load alone. - The within-rack spread chose a destination machine by free slots alone, so if that machine's only nodes were already at the SameRackCount cap it skipped the move instead of trying another machine. Require a machine to have a node that can actually take the shard before selecting it. * reduce comments across the machine-affinity change Trim narration down to the non-obvious why; one terse line where a block was overkill. * ec.balance: gate machine spread on fault-tolerance feasibility Spreading a volume evenly across machines only helps when there are enough that each can stay within EC's parity tolerance (numMachines >= ceil(total/parity)). With fewer -- or wildly unequal -- machines it can't make a machine loss survivable anyway, and forcing it fights capacity: e.g. a cluster of 12 volume servers on one host and 2 on another would have half of every volume crammed onto the 2-server box. So spread across machines only when it's achievable; otherwise fall back to per-node spread and let capacity/global balancing decide. The global load phase applies the same test: it protects a volume's machine spread (no cross-machine move that raises a machine's count past the source's) only where that spread is achievable, so heterogeneous clusters still level by fullness. * ec.balance worker: group servers by host when planning The worker built its planner topology without recording each server's host, so automated ec.balance treated ports on one machine as independent nodes and could concentrate a volume's shards on one physical box. Set the host from the volume server address, matching the shell path. * volume.balance worker: don't move a replica onto a machine holding one The worker compared only node ids, and the replica map dropped the server address, so it could move replicas onto different ports of one machine. Carry the host on ReplicaLocation (from the server address) and reject a target whose host already holds another replica of the volume. Best-effort, matching the shell. * ec.balance: judge machine-spread feasibility by the rack's shards The within-rack and global feasibility checks compared the whole volume's shard count against a rack's machine count, so a rack holding only part of a volume after cross-rack spreading -- e.g. 7 of a 10+4 volume across 2 machines -- was wrongly judged infeasible and fell back to node spread, which could pile 6 shards onto one host, past parity. Gate on the rack's own shard count of the volume instead. * ec.balance: spread a volume's shards across machines by combined count EC recovers from any loss within parity regardless of shard type, so what bounds a machine's exposure is its total shards of the volume, not data and parity separately. Spreading the two independently let each type's remainder land on the same machine -- ceil(d/M)+ceil(p/M) can exceed ceil(total/M), e.g. a 5/3 split where 4/4 was achievable, past parity. Balance the combined count in one pass; disk-level data/parity anti-affinity stays in pickBestDiskOnNode. * ec.balance: don't let the imbalance threshold skip an over-parity machine The within-rack spread gated on relative skew ((max-min)/avg > threshold), so a worker threshold of 0.5 skipped an exactly-50%-skewed layout like 5/4/3 for a 10+4 volume, leaving 5 shards -- past parity -- on one machine. The even cap (ceil(shards/groups)) is the real bound and the move loop already sheds only what exceeds it, so drop the threshold gate from the within-rack phase (machine and node): a balanced rack stays a no-op while any over-cap machine is always fixed. * ec.balance: keep the imbalance threshold for the node fallback Dropping the threshold from the whole within-rack phase made the node fallback too eager: it runs only when machine fault tolerance is unachievable, so it is cosmetic load distribution that should defer to the global utilization phase. Without the gate it would, for a one-server-per-host 6/4 split at threshold 0.5, schedule a count move that worsens utilization balance. Restore the threshold there; machine spreading keeps bypassing it, since that bound is durability, not cosmetic skew. |
||
|
Chris LuandGitHub
|
d4e39b499b |
EC placement: shared replica-placement resolver, snapshot + Place core, capacity fixes, tiering (#9621)
* Add shared super_block.ResolveReplicaPlacement; use it in ec_balance * Add ecbalancer.FromActiveTopology snapshot constructor for EC encode/repair * Add ecbalancer.Place greenfield/repair placement core (strict + durability-first) * topology: add GetEffectiveAvailableEcShardSlots; FromActiveTopology uses shard-granular free slots GetDisksWithEffectiveCapacity flattens reserved shard slots into volume slots via integer truncation, so an in-flight EC task reserving a non-multiple-of- DataShardsCount number of shards was lost from the snapshot and freeSlots was over-reported. GetEffectiveAvailableEcShardSlots subtracts the full reservation impact at shard granularity. * ecbalancer.Place: reject nodes without a free disk of the requested type FromActiveTopology keeps all disk types in the snapshot, so an SSD-only request could be routed to a node with only HDD capacity (pickBestDiskOnNode then returns disk 0 on the wrong tier). Filter rack/node selection to those with a free disk of the requested type. * ecbalancer.Place: enforce ReplicaPlacement DiffDataCenterCount (per-DC shard cap) * ecbalancer: enforce DiffDataCenterCount in balance (cross-DC phase + cross-rack DC cap) Adds a cross-DC corrective phase that drains data centers holding more than DiffDataCenterCount shards of a volume, and a per-DC cap on cross-rack move targets. Both are no-ops when DiffDataCenterCount is unset, so balance output is unchanged for non-DC placements. * topology: ratio-aware EC shard slots and provisional empty-disk slot GetEffectiveAvailableEcShardSlots now takes the target collection's data-shard count, so a 4+2 volume's larger shards are not over-counted at 10 per volume slot; and it keeps the one provisional slot for freshly started empty servers that report max=0, matching getEffectiveAvailableCapacityUnsafe. FromActiveTopology threads the ratio through. * ecbalancer.Place: explicit disk-type filter signal (fix HDD vs any ambiguity) HardDriveType normalizes to "", which collided with "" meaning any disk. Add Constraints.FilterDiskType and normalize both sides so a hdd request matches disks reported as "" and never leaks to SSD, while filter=false still means any. * ecbalancer: add clearShardAccounting for repair snapshot reconciliation Clears one disk's copy of a shard from per-domain accounting and recomputes the node-level union (preserving a kept copy on another disk of the same node), without crediting capacity. Repair uses it to drop to-be-deleted copies before placing missing shards. * ecbalancer: don't cap cross-DC target racks when DiffRackCount is unset len(racks)+1 wrongly limited each target rack (3 in a 2-rack cluster), so draining a DC could stop short of the DiffDataCenterCount cap. Use MaxShardCount+1 as the effectively-unlimited default. * topology/ecbalancer: ratio-correct EC capacity accounting Reservation shard slots (default ShardsPerVolumeSlot units) are now converted to the target ratio before subtracting, and existing EC shards are charged by size (targetDataShards/shardDataShards) so a 2+1 shard isn't counted as one 10+4 slot. Per-shard ratio lookup is behind shardDataShards (OSS uses the standard ratio). * ecbalancer.Place: candidate tiering and eligible-rack caps Adds a per-disk eligibility/preference abstraction so Place supports: - preferred-tag whole-plan retry (try disks carrying the earliest tags first, widen to all only if a tier cannot place every shard; reports SpilledOutsidePreferredTags), - soft disk-type spill via DiskTypePolicy (Any/Prefer/Require): Prefer fills the preferred type then spills, reporting SpilledToOtherDiskType; Require filters, - even per-rack caps that divide by racks holding an eligible disk, so a tiered cluster (e.g. SSDs in 2 of 4 racks) isn't capped impossibly low. Disk tags carried via Node.AddDiskTags + FromActiveTopology. * ecbalancer: export ClearShardAccounting for repair snapshot reconciliation * ecbalancer: address review feedback (ratio rounding, bitmap walk, same-DC moves) - topology/ecbalancer: round shard-reservation and existing-shard footprint up when converting to target-ratio shard slots, so a sub-slot reservation is not truncated to zero and free capacity is not overstated for low-data-shard layouts (targetDataShards < ds). - erasure_coding: add ShardBits.All iterator and use it across the balancer, cross-DC phase, and placement scoring instead of scanning 0..MaxShardCount and probing Has on every id. - ecbalancer: allow same-DC cross-rack moves when a DC already sits at its DiffDataCenterCount cap; a same-DC move leaves the DC total unchanged. Add a regression test that fails without the guard. - ecbalancer cross-DC phase: pick targets via the eligible-aware pickNodeInRackEligible/pickBestDiskEligible helpers so the disk-type filter is honored and a 0 disk id is not mistaken for a valid selection. * ecbalancer: test ecShardSlotsOnDisk fractional round-up Cover the mixed-ratio path (targetDataShards < existing data shards) so a shard's fractional footprint is never floored to zero and free capacity is not overstated. Exercises the round-up via the targetDataShards parameter; OSS uses the standard ratio at runtime while the enterprise build hits it with real per-volume ratios. * ecbalancer: assert node B rack in TestFromActiveTopology * ecbalancer: split Destination into separate DataCenter and bare Rack Replace the composite "dc:rack" Rack field on Destination with separate DataCenter and bare Rack values, matching topology.DiskInfo and the worker-task convention. Callers (and tests) read the data center directly instead of parsing the composite with strings.SplitN. * shell ec.balance: use utilization-based global balancing (parity with worker) The shell's global rebalance phase balanced by raw shard count; switch it to fractional fullness (shards/capacity), as the worker already does. On uniform capacity the two agree; on heterogeneous capacity it fills nodes proportionally instead of driving small-capacity nodes toward full. Updates the heterogeneous-capacity regression test to assert even fullness (~equal shards/capacity per node) rather than even shard count. * ecbalancer: bounded-proportional per-DC shard spread DiffDataCenterCount was enforced only as a ceiling (drain-to-cap), which could leave a within-cap-but-lopsided DC distribution under a loose cap (e.g. 10/4 of 14 with cap=10). Now the cross-DC phase, the cross-rack DC guard, and Place all target boundedMaxPerDC = min(DiffDataCenterCount, max(ceil(total/numDCs), parityShards)): shards spread proportionally across DCs, but no tighter than the durability floor (once each DC holds <= parityShards a DC loss is recoverable, so further spreading only adds cross-DC/WAN traffic). No-op when DiffDataCenterCount is 0; identical to before when the cap is the binding constraint. * ecbalancer: drop DiffDataCenterCount enforcement for EC placement The 1-byte volume ReplicaPlacement packs xyz into x*100+y*10+z<=255, so the DC digit can only be 0-2 -- far too small to be a meaningful per-DC EC shard cap (a cap of 1-2 would demand 7-14 DCs for a 10+4 volume). It's volume replica-placement, not an EC spec. Removes the cross-DC balance phase, the DC guard in the cross-rack phase, and the per-DC cap in Place (and the just-added bounded-proportional logic); EC relies on the RP-independent rack/node even spread instead. Rack/node caps (DiffRackCount/SameRackCount) are unchanged. Per-domain EC caps are left for a real EC placement spec. * ecbalancer: enforce per-disk durability cap; symmetric reserve/release Place now refuses to put more than parityShards shards of a volume on a single disk (pickBestDiskEligible skips a disk once it holds parityShards of the volume, a hard cap not relaxed even in durability-first). Previously Place assigned by free capacity, so a skewed near-full cluster could pile >parityShards onto one disk -> losing it loses the volume; only distinct-disk count was checked. This covers encode and repair (both route through Place); the caller skips/leaves the volume rather than minting an unrecoverable layout. Also makes reserveShard decrement freeSlots unconditionally, symmetric with releaseShard's unconditional increment (the old guarded decrement could credit a phantom slot on release if a shard were ever reserved onto a full disk). * ecbalancer: add Topology.ReleaseVolumeShards (clear + credit) for greenfield encode Releases all of a volume's shards from the snapshot and credits the freed disk capacity, so a greenfield encode can plan as if stale EC shards from a prior failed attempt are gone. Safe to credit because the encode task deletes stale shards (cleanupStaleEcShards) before distributing the new ones. Distinct from ClearShardAccounting (repair), which does not credit. * ecbalancer: ReleaseVolumeShards credits node freeSlots, not just disks releaseShard only increments per-disk freeSlots, but rack capacity is summed from node freeSlots (buildRacks) and node freeSlots gates node eligibility. Crediting only disks left a node/rack looking full after releasing stale shards, so a greenfield encode still couldn't use the freed capacity. Now credits the node by the total disk-slots freed. * ecbalancer: correct PlacementMode docs (encode uses durability-first) PlaceStrict was labeled '(encode)' but encode uses PlaceDurabilityFirst. Clarify that durability-first is used by both encode and repair, reports relaxations in PlaceResult.Relaxed, and never relaxes the per-disk durability cap. * ecbalancer: treat SameRackCount as a direct per-node shard cap The 3rd ReplicaPlacement digit now caps shards per node at exactly the digit value, matching how DiffRackCount (2nd digit) caps per rack, instead of allowing digit+1 per node. This makes the per-rack and per-node caps consistent and matches the documented "digits cap EC shards per rack and per node" semantics; e.g. 011 now means at most one shard per rack and one per node. |
||
|
Chris LuandGitHub
|
391f543ff2 |
fix(ec): correct multi-disk disk counting and EC balance shard attribution (#9594)
* fix(shell): count physical disks in cluster.status on multi-disk nodes
The master keys DataNodeInfo.DiskInfos by disk type, so several same-type
physical disks on one node collapse into a single DiskInfo entry. cluster.status
(printClusterInfo) and CountTopologyResources counted len(DiskInfos), reporting
one disk per node instead of the real physical disk count, while volume.list and
the admin ActiveTopology already split per physical disk.
Route both counters through DiskInfo.SplitByPhysicalDisk so a node with N
same-type disks reports N. Cosmetic/diagnostic only; placement already uses the
per-disk activeDisk map.
* fix(ec): attribute EC balance source disk per shard and reject same-node moves
On multi-disk nodes the EC balance worker built a node-level view that kept only
the first physical disk id per (node, volume), so a move of a shard living on a
different disk reported the wrong source disk. That source disk drives the
per-disk capacity reservation, so the wrong disk drifts the capacity model the
EC placement planner relies on. Track shards per physical disk and resolve the
actual source disk for every emitted move (dedup, cross-rack, within-rack,
global), keeping the per-disk view consistent as simulated moves are applied.
Also close a data-loss trap: VolumeEcShardsDelete is node-wide (it removes the
shard from every disk on the node) and copyAndMountShard skips the copy when
source and target addresses match, so a same-node move would erase a shard it
never copied. isDedupPhase now requires the same node AND disk, and Validate /
Execute reject same-node cross-disk moves outright.
* fix(ec): spread EC balance moves across destination disks
Port the shell ec.balance pickBestDiskOnNode heuristic to the EC balance
worker so a moved shard is placed on a good physical disk instead of always
deferring to the volume server (target disk 0). The detection now builds a
per-physical-disk view of each node (free slots split from the node total, exact
EC shard count, disk type, discovered from both regular volumes and EC shards)
and, for each cross-rack, within-rack, and global move, chooses the destination
disk by ascending score:
- fewer total EC shards on the disk,
- far fewer shards of the same volume on the disk (spread a volume's shards
across disks for fault tolerance), and
- data/parity anti-affinity (a data shard avoids disks holding the volume's
parity shards and vice versa).
Planned placements are reserved on the in-memory model during a run so multiple
shards moved to the same node spread across its disks rather than piling on one.
* fix(ec): bring EC balance worker to parity with shell ec.balance
The worker's cross-rack and within-rack balancing balanced shards by total
count; the shell balances data and parity shards separately with anti-affinity
and honors replica placement. Port that logic so the automatic balancer makes
the same fault-tolerance-aware decisions as the manual command:
- Cross-rack and within-rack now run a two-pass balance: data shards spread
first, then parity shards spread while avoiding racks/nodes that already hold
the volume's data shards (anti-affinity), mirroring doBalanceEcShardsAcrossRacks
and doBalanceEcShardsWithinOneRack.
- Optional replica placement: a new replica_placement config (e.g. "020")
constrains shards per rack (DiffRackCount) and per node (SameRackCount); empty
keeps the previous even-spread behavior.
- The data/parity boundary is resolved from a per-collection EC ratio (standard
10+4 here), replacing the previously hardcoded constant at the call sites.
Selection is deterministic (sorted keys) to keep behavior reproducible.
* refactor(ec): extract shared ecbalancer package for shell and worker
The EC shard balancing policy was duplicated between the shell ec.balance
command and the admin EC balance worker, and the two had drifted (multi-disk
handling, data/parity anti-affinity, replica placement). Extract the policy into
a new pure package, weed/storage/erasure_coding/ecbalancer, that both callers
share so it cannot drift again.
- ecbalancer.Plan(topology, options) runs the full policy (dedup, cross-rack and
within-rack data/parity two-pass with anti-affinity, global per-rack balance,
and diversity-aware disk selection) over a caller-built Topology snapshot and
returns the shard Moves. It depends only on erasure_coding and super_block.
- The worker builds the Topology from the master topology and turns Moves into
task proposals; the shell builds it from its EcNode model and executes Moves
via the existing move/delete RPCs. Per-collection EC ratio resolution stays in
each caller (passed as Options.Ratio).
- Options expose the two genuine policy differences: GlobalUtilizationBased
(worker balances by fractional fullness; shell by raw count) and
GlobalMaxMovesPerRack (worker moves incrementally across cycles; shell drains
in one pass).
The shell keeps pickBestDiskOnNode for the evacuate command. Policy tests move to
the ecbalancer package; the shell and worker keep their adapter/execution tests.
* fix(ec): restore parallelism and per-type/full-range balancing after ecbalancer refactor
Address regressions and gaps from the ecbalancer extraction:
- Shell ec.balance honors -maxParallelization again: planned moves run phase by
phase (preserving cross-phase dependencies) with bounded concurrency within a
phase. Apply mode does only the RPCs concurrently; dry-run stays sequential and
updates the in-memory model for inspection.
- Rack and node balancing gate on per-type spread (data and parity separately)
instead of combined totals, so a data/parity skew is corrected even when the
per-rack/node totals are even.
- Global rack balancing iterates the full shard-id space (MaxShardCount) so
custom EC ratios with more than the standard total are candidates.
- Cross-rack planning decrements the destination node's free slots per planned
move, so limited-capacity targets are no longer over-planned.
* fix(ec): make EC dedup keeper deterministic and capacity-aware
When a shard is duplicated across nodes, keep the copy on the node with the most
free slots and delete the duplicates from the more-constrained nodes, relieving
capacity pressure where it is tightest. Tie-break on node id so the choice is
deterministic. This unifies the shell and worker (the shell previously kept the
least-free node, an incidental default) on the more sensible behavior.
* fix(ec): restore global volume-diversity and per-volume move serialization
Two more behaviors lost in the ecbalancer refactor:
- Global rack balancing again prefers moving a shard of a volume the destination
does not hold at all before adding another shard of an already-present volume
(two-pass, mirroring the old balanceEcRack), keeping each volume's shards
spread across nodes.
- Shell apply-mode execution serializes a single volume's moves within a phase
while still running different volumes in parallel, so concurrent moves of the
same volume cannot race on its shared .ecx/.ecj/.vif sidecar files.
* fix(ec): key EC balance shards by (collection, volume id)
A numeric volume id can be reused across collections, and EC identity is
(collection, vid) (see store_ec_attach_reservation.go). The ecbalancer keyed
Node.shards by vid alone, so volumes sharing an id across collections merged into
one entry — letting dedup delete a "duplicate" that is actually a different
collection's shard, and letting moves act across collections. Key shards by
(collection, vid) throughout so each volume stays distinct.
* fix(ec): credit freed capacity from dedup before later balance phases
Dedup deletions are simulated only by applyMovesToTopology, which cleared shard
bits but did not return the freed disk/node/rack slots. Later phases reject
destinations with no free slots, so a slot opened by dedup could not be reused in
the same Plan/ec.balance run. applyMovesToTopology now credits the freed
disk/node/rack capacity for dedup moves (non-dedup moves still rely on the inline
accounting their phase already did).
* test(ec): add multi-disk EC balance integration test
Cover issue 9593 end-to-end at the unit level the old tests missed: build the
master's actual multi-disk wire format (same-type disks collapsed into one
DiskInfo, real DiskId only in per-shard records), run it through a real
ActiveTopology and the Detection entry point, then replay the planned moves with
the volume server's true semantics (node-wide VolumeEcShardsDelete) and assert no
EC shard is ever lost. Covers a balanced spread, a one-node-concentrated volume,
and a multi-rack spread, and asserts moves are safe (no same-node cross-disk),
correctly attributed to the source disk, and redistribute concentrated volumes
across both other racks and multiple destination disks.
* fix(ec): aggregate per-disk EC shards when verifying multi-disk volumes
collectEcNodeShardsInfo overwrote its per-server entry for each EcShardInfo of a
volume. A multi-disk node reports one EcShardInfo per physical disk holding shards
of the volume, so only the last disk's shards survived — the node looked like it
was missing shards it actually had. This made ec.encode's pre-delete verification
(and ec.decode) under-count volumes whose shards are spread across disks on one
server, falsely aborting the encode on multi-disk clusters. Union the per-disk
shard sets per server instead.
Also make verifyEcShardsBeforeDelete poll briefly: shard relocations reach the
master via volume-server heartbeats, so a freshly distributed shard set may not be
fully visible the instant the balance returns. Retry before concluding the set is
incomplete; genuine loss still fails after the retries are exhausted.
* test(ec): end-to-end multi-disk EC balance shard-loss regression
Start a real cluster of multi-disk volume servers (3 servers x 4 disks),
EC-encode a volume, run ec.balance, and assert hard invariants the prior
integration tests only logged: after encode all 14 shards exist, ec.balance loses
no shard, shards span more than one disk per node, and cluster.status counts
physical disks (not one per node). This reproduces issue 9593 end to end and would
have caught the multi-disk shard-aggregation bug fixed alongside it.
* fix(ec): bring EC balance worker/plugin path to parity with shell
- Per-volume serialization and phase order: key the plugin proposal dedupe by
(collection, volume) instead of (volume, shard, source), so the scheduler runs
only one of a volume's moves at a time (within a run and against in-flight jobs).
Concurrent same-volume moves raced on the volume's .ecx/.ecj/.vif sidecars; and
because the planner emits a volume's moves in phase order, they now execute in
order across detection cycles, matching the shell.
- disk_type "hdd": normalize via ToDiskType (hdd -> "" HardDriveType) while keeping
a "filter requested" flag, so disk_type=hdd matches the empty-keyed HDD disks
instead of nothing; apply the canonical type to planner options and move params.
- Replica placement: expose shard_replica_placement in the admin config form and
read it into the worker config, mirroring ec.balance -shardReplicaPlacement.
* test(ec): rename worker in-process test (not a real integration test)
The worker-package multi-disk tests build a fake master topology and simulate
move execution; they are not real-cluster integration tests. Rename
integration_test.go -> multidisk_detection_test.go and drop the Integration
prefix so 'integration' refers only to the real-cluster E2Es in test/erasure_coding.
* ci(ec): remove redundant ec-integration workflow
ec-integration.yml duplicated EC Integration Tests under the same workflow name
but ran only 'go test ec_integration_test.go' (one file), so it never ran new
test files (e.g. multidisk_shardloss_test.go) and was a strict, path-filtered
subset of ec-integration-tests.yml, which already runs 'go test -v' over the whole
test/erasure_coding package on every push/PR.
* fix(ec): worker falls back to master default replication for EC balance
For strict parity with the shell, the EC balance worker now uses the master's
configured default replication as the replica-placement fallback when no explicit
shard_replica_placement is set, instead of always defaulting to even spread.
The maintenance scanner reads it via GetMasterConfiguration each cycle and passes
it through ClusterInfo.DefaultReplicaPlacement; detection resolves the constraint
(explicit config wins, else master default, else none) in resolveReplicaPlacement.
A zero-replication default (the common 000 case) still means even spread, so the
common configuration is unchanged.
* fix(ec): plugin path populates master default replication too
The plugin worker built ClusterInfo with only ActiveTopology, so the master
default replication fallback added for the maintenance path never reached
plugin-driven EC balance detection — empty shard_replica_placement still meant
even spread there. Fetch the master default via GetMasterConfiguration (new
pluginworker.FetchDefaultReplicaPlacement) and set ClusterInfo.DefaultReplicaPlacement
so both detection paths resolve replica placement identically to the shell.
* docs(ec): empty shard replica placement uses master default, not even spread
The EC balance config text (admin plugin form, legacy form help text, and
the struct/proto field comments) still said an empty shard_replica_placement
spreads evenly. The runtime resolves empty to the master default replication
(resolveReplicaPlacement), matching shell ec.balance, with even spread only
when that default is empty or zero. Update the text to match and regenerate
worker_pb for the proto comment change.
|