mirror of
https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs.git
synced 2026-05-30 21:46:21 +00:00
ba9e74d8a7604ebb215230c00a0eee7dbbb3139e
17 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Chris Lu
|
d4e39b499b |
EC placement: shared replica-placement resolver, snapshot + Place core, capacity fixes, tiering (#9621)
* Add shared super_block.ResolveReplicaPlacement; use it in ec_balance * Add ecbalancer.FromActiveTopology snapshot constructor for EC encode/repair * Add ecbalancer.Place greenfield/repair placement core (strict + durability-first) * topology: add GetEffectiveAvailableEcShardSlots; FromActiveTopology uses shard-granular free slots GetDisksWithEffectiveCapacity flattens reserved shard slots into volume slots via integer truncation, so an in-flight EC task reserving a non-multiple-of- DataShardsCount number of shards was lost from the snapshot and freeSlots was over-reported. GetEffectiveAvailableEcShardSlots subtracts the full reservation impact at shard granularity. * ecbalancer.Place: reject nodes without a free disk of the requested type FromActiveTopology keeps all disk types in the snapshot, so an SSD-only request could be routed to a node with only HDD capacity (pickBestDiskOnNode then returns disk 0 on the wrong tier). Filter rack/node selection to those with a free disk of the requested type. * ecbalancer.Place: enforce ReplicaPlacement DiffDataCenterCount (per-DC shard cap) * ecbalancer: enforce DiffDataCenterCount in balance (cross-DC phase + cross-rack DC cap) Adds a cross-DC corrective phase that drains data centers holding more than DiffDataCenterCount shards of a volume, and a per-DC cap on cross-rack move targets. Both are no-ops when DiffDataCenterCount is unset, so balance output is unchanged for non-DC placements. * topology: ratio-aware EC shard slots and provisional empty-disk slot GetEffectiveAvailableEcShardSlots now takes the target collection's data-shard count, so a 4+2 volume's larger shards are not over-counted at 10 per volume slot; and it keeps the one provisional slot for freshly started empty servers that report max=0, matching getEffectiveAvailableCapacityUnsafe. FromActiveTopology threads the ratio through. * ecbalancer.Place: explicit disk-type filter signal (fix HDD vs any ambiguity) HardDriveType normalizes to "", which collided with "" meaning any disk. Add Constraints.FilterDiskType and normalize both sides so a hdd request matches disks reported as "" and never leaks to SSD, while filter=false still means any. * ecbalancer: add clearShardAccounting for repair snapshot reconciliation Clears one disk's copy of a shard from per-domain accounting and recomputes the node-level union (preserving a kept copy on another disk of the same node), without crediting capacity. Repair uses it to drop to-be-deleted copies before placing missing shards. * ecbalancer: don't cap cross-DC target racks when DiffRackCount is unset len(racks)+1 wrongly limited each target rack (3 in a 2-rack cluster), so draining a DC could stop short of the DiffDataCenterCount cap. Use MaxShardCount+1 as the effectively-unlimited default. * topology/ecbalancer: ratio-correct EC capacity accounting Reservation shard slots (default ShardsPerVolumeSlot units) are now converted to the target ratio before subtracting, and existing EC shards are charged by size (targetDataShards/shardDataShards) so a 2+1 shard isn't counted as one 10+4 slot. Per-shard ratio lookup is behind shardDataShards (OSS uses the standard ratio). * ecbalancer.Place: candidate tiering and eligible-rack caps Adds a per-disk eligibility/preference abstraction so Place supports: - preferred-tag whole-plan retry (try disks carrying the earliest tags first, widen to all only if a tier cannot place every shard; reports SpilledOutsidePreferredTags), - soft disk-type spill via DiskTypePolicy (Any/Prefer/Require): Prefer fills the preferred type then spills, reporting SpilledToOtherDiskType; Require filters, - even per-rack caps that divide by racks holding an eligible disk, so a tiered cluster (e.g. SSDs in 2 of 4 racks) isn't capped impossibly low. Disk tags carried via Node.AddDiskTags + FromActiveTopology. * ecbalancer: export ClearShardAccounting for repair snapshot reconciliation * ecbalancer: address review feedback (ratio rounding, bitmap walk, same-DC moves) - topology/ecbalancer: round shard-reservation and existing-shard footprint up when converting to target-ratio shard slots, so a sub-slot reservation is not truncated to zero and free capacity is not overstated for low-data-shard layouts (targetDataShards < ds). - erasure_coding: add ShardBits.All iterator and use it across the balancer, cross-DC phase, and placement scoring instead of scanning 0..MaxShardCount and probing Has on every id. - ecbalancer: allow same-DC cross-rack moves when a DC already sits at its DiffDataCenterCount cap; a same-DC move leaves the DC total unchanged. Add a regression test that fails without the guard. - ecbalancer cross-DC phase: pick targets via the eligible-aware pickNodeInRackEligible/pickBestDiskEligible helpers so the disk-type filter is honored and a 0 disk id is not mistaken for a valid selection. * ecbalancer: test ecShardSlotsOnDisk fractional round-up Cover the mixed-ratio path (targetDataShards < existing data shards) so a shard's fractional footprint is never floored to zero and free capacity is not overstated. Exercises the round-up via the targetDataShards parameter; OSS uses the standard ratio at runtime while the enterprise build hits it with real per-volume ratios. * ecbalancer: assert node B rack in TestFromActiveTopology * ecbalancer: split Destination into separate DataCenter and bare Rack Replace the composite "dc:rack" Rack field on Destination with separate DataCenter and bare Rack values, matching topology.DiskInfo and the worker-task convention. Callers (and tests) read the data center directly instead of parsing the composite with strings.SplitN. * shell ec.balance: use utilization-based global balancing (parity with worker) The shell's global rebalance phase balanced by raw shard count; switch it to fractional fullness (shards/capacity), as the worker already does. On uniform capacity the two agree; on heterogeneous capacity it fills nodes proportionally instead of driving small-capacity nodes toward full. Updates the heterogeneous-capacity regression test to assert even fullness (~equal shards/capacity per node) rather than even shard count. * ecbalancer: bounded-proportional per-DC shard spread DiffDataCenterCount was enforced only as a ceiling (drain-to-cap), which could leave a within-cap-but-lopsided DC distribution under a loose cap (e.g. 10/4 of 14 with cap=10). Now the cross-DC phase, the cross-rack DC guard, and Place all target boundedMaxPerDC = min(DiffDataCenterCount, max(ceil(total/numDCs), parityShards)): shards spread proportionally across DCs, but no tighter than the durability floor (once each DC holds <= parityShards a DC loss is recoverable, so further spreading only adds cross-DC/WAN traffic). No-op when DiffDataCenterCount is 0; identical to before when the cap is the binding constraint. * ecbalancer: drop DiffDataCenterCount enforcement for EC placement The 1-byte volume ReplicaPlacement packs xyz into x*100+y*10+z<=255, so the DC digit can only be 0-2 -- far too small to be a meaningful per-DC EC shard cap (a cap of 1-2 would demand 7-14 DCs for a 10+4 volume). It's volume replica-placement, not an EC spec. Removes the cross-DC balance phase, the DC guard in the cross-rack phase, and the per-DC cap in Place (and the just-added bounded-proportional logic); EC relies on the RP-independent rack/node even spread instead. Rack/node caps (DiffRackCount/SameRackCount) are unchanged. Per-domain EC caps are left for a real EC placement spec. * ecbalancer: enforce per-disk durability cap; symmetric reserve/release Place now refuses to put more than parityShards shards of a volume on a single disk (pickBestDiskEligible skips a disk once it holds parityShards of the volume, a hard cap not relaxed even in durability-first). Previously Place assigned by free capacity, so a skewed near-full cluster could pile >parityShards onto one disk -> losing it loses the volume; only distinct-disk count was checked. This covers encode and repair (both route through Place); the caller skips/leaves the volume rather than minting an unrecoverable layout. Also makes reserveShard decrement freeSlots unconditionally, symmetric with releaseShard's unconditional increment (the old guarded decrement could credit a phantom slot on release if a shard were ever reserved onto a full disk). * ecbalancer: add Topology.ReleaseVolumeShards (clear + credit) for greenfield encode Releases all of a volume's shards from the snapshot and credits the freed disk capacity, so a greenfield encode can plan as if stale EC shards from a prior failed attempt are gone. Safe to credit because the encode task deletes stale shards (cleanupStaleEcShards) before distributing the new ones. Distinct from ClearShardAccounting (repair), which does not credit. * ecbalancer: ReleaseVolumeShards credits node freeSlots, not just disks releaseShard only increments per-disk freeSlots, but rack capacity is summed from node freeSlots (buildRacks) and node freeSlots gates node eligibility. Crediting only disks left a node/rack looking full after releasing stale shards, so a greenfield encode still couldn't use the freed capacity. Now credits the node by the total disk-slots freed. * ecbalancer: correct PlacementMode docs (encode uses durability-first) PlaceStrict was labeled '(encode)' but encode uses PlaceDurabilityFirst. Clarify that durability-first is used by both encode and repair, reports relaxations in PlaceResult.Relaxed, and never relaxes the per-disk durability cap. * ecbalancer: treat SameRackCount as a direct per-node shard cap The 3rd ReplicaPlacement digit now caps shards per node at exactly the digit value, matching how DiffRackCount (2nd digit) caps per rack, instead of allowing digit+1 per node. This makes the per-rack and per-node caps consistent and matches the documented "digits cap EC shards per rack and per node" semantics; e.g. 011 now means at most one shard per rack and one per node. |
||
|
Chris Lu
|
391f543ff2 |
fix(ec): correct multi-disk disk counting and EC balance shard attribution (#9594)
* fix(shell): count physical disks in cluster.status on multi-disk nodes
The master keys DataNodeInfo.DiskInfos by disk type, so several same-type
physical disks on one node collapse into a single DiskInfo entry. cluster.status
(printClusterInfo) and CountTopologyResources counted len(DiskInfos), reporting
one disk per node instead of the real physical disk count, while volume.list and
the admin ActiveTopology already split per physical disk.
Route both counters through DiskInfo.SplitByPhysicalDisk so a node with N
same-type disks reports N. Cosmetic/diagnostic only; placement already uses the
per-disk activeDisk map.
* fix(ec): attribute EC balance source disk per shard and reject same-node moves
On multi-disk nodes the EC balance worker built a node-level view that kept only
the first physical disk id per (node, volume), so a move of a shard living on a
different disk reported the wrong source disk. That source disk drives the
per-disk capacity reservation, so the wrong disk drifts the capacity model the
EC placement planner relies on. Track shards per physical disk and resolve the
actual source disk for every emitted move (dedup, cross-rack, within-rack,
global), keeping the per-disk view consistent as simulated moves are applied.
Also close a data-loss trap: VolumeEcShardsDelete is node-wide (it removes the
shard from every disk on the node) and copyAndMountShard skips the copy when
source and target addresses match, so a same-node move would erase a shard it
never copied. isDedupPhase now requires the same node AND disk, and Validate /
Execute reject same-node cross-disk moves outright.
* fix(ec): spread EC balance moves across destination disks
Port the shell ec.balance pickBestDiskOnNode heuristic to the EC balance
worker so a moved shard is placed on a good physical disk instead of always
deferring to the volume server (target disk 0). The detection now builds a
per-physical-disk view of each node (free slots split from the node total, exact
EC shard count, disk type, discovered from both regular volumes and EC shards)
and, for each cross-rack, within-rack, and global move, chooses the destination
disk by ascending score:
- fewer total EC shards on the disk,
- far fewer shards of the same volume on the disk (spread a volume's shards
across disks for fault tolerance), and
- data/parity anti-affinity (a data shard avoids disks holding the volume's
parity shards and vice versa).
Planned placements are reserved on the in-memory model during a run so multiple
shards moved to the same node spread across its disks rather than piling on one.
* fix(ec): bring EC balance worker to parity with shell ec.balance
The worker's cross-rack and within-rack balancing balanced shards by total
count; the shell balances data and parity shards separately with anti-affinity
and honors replica placement. Port that logic so the automatic balancer makes
the same fault-tolerance-aware decisions as the manual command:
- Cross-rack and within-rack now run a two-pass balance: data shards spread
first, then parity shards spread while avoiding racks/nodes that already hold
the volume's data shards (anti-affinity), mirroring doBalanceEcShardsAcrossRacks
and doBalanceEcShardsWithinOneRack.
- Optional replica placement: a new replica_placement config (e.g. "020")
constrains shards per rack (DiffRackCount) and per node (SameRackCount); empty
keeps the previous even-spread behavior.
- The data/parity boundary is resolved from a per-collection EC ratio (standard
10+4 here), replacing the previously hardcoded constant at the call sites.
Selection is deterministic (sorted keys) to keep behavior reproducible.
* refactor(ec): extract shared ecbalancer package for shell and worker
The EC shard balancing policy was duplicated between the shell ec.balance
command and the admin EC balance worker, and the two had drifted (multi-disk
handling, data/parity anti-affinity, replica placement). Extract the policy into
a new pure package, weed/storage/erasure_coding/ecbalancer, that both callers
share so it cannot drift again.
- ecbalancer.Plan(topology, options) runs the full policy (dedup, cross-rack and
within-rack data/parity two-pass with anti-affinity, global per-rack balance,
and diversity-aware disk selection) over a caller-built Topology snapshot and
returns the shard Moves. It depends only on erasure_coding and super_block.
- The worker builds the Topology from the master topology and turns Moves into
task proposals; the shell builds it from its EcNode model and executes Moves
via the existing move/delete RPCs. Per-collection EC ratio resolution stays in
each caller (passed as Options.Ratio).
- Options expose the two genuine policy differences: GlobalUtilizationBased
(worker balances by fractional fullness; shell by raw count) and
GlobalMaxMovesPerRack (worker moves incrementally across cycles; shell drains
in one pass).
The shell keeps pickBestDiskOnNode for the evacuate command. Policy tests move to
the ecbalancer package; the shell and worker keep their adapter/execution tests.
* fix(ec): restore parallelism and per-type/full-range balancing after ecbalancer refactor
Address regressions and gaps from the ecbalancer extraction:
- Shell ec.balance honors -maxParallelization again: planned moves run phase by
phase (preserving cross-phase dependencies) with bounded concurrency within a
phase. Apply mode does only the RPCs concurrently; dry-run stays sequential and
updates the in-memory model for inspection.
- Rack and node balancing gate on per-type spread (data and parity separately)
instead of combined totals, so a data/parity skew is corrected even when the
per-rack/node totals are even.
- Global rack balancing iterates the full shard-id space (MaxShardCount) so
custom EC ratios with more than the standard total are candidates.
- Cross-rack planning decrements the destination node's free slots per planned
move, so limited-capacity targets are no longer over-planned.
* fix(ec): make EC dedup keeper deterministic and capacity-aware
When a shard is duplicated across nodes, keep the copy on the node with the most
free slots and delete the duplicates from the more-constrained nodes, relieving
capacity pressure where it is tightest. Tie-break on node id so the choice is
deterministic. This unifies the shell and worker (the shell previously kept the
least-free node, an incidental default) on the more sensible behavior.
* fix(ec): restore global volume-diversity and per-volume move serialization
Two more behaviors lost in the ecbalancer refactor:
- Global rack balancing again prefers moving a shard of a volume the destination
does not hold at all before adding another shard of an already-present volume
(two-pass, mirroring the old balanceEcRack), keeping each volume's shards
spread across nodes.
- Shell apply-mode execution serializes a single volume's moves within a phase
while still running different volumes in parallel, so concurrent moves of the
same volume cannot race on its shared .ecx/.ecj/.vif sidecar files.
* fix(ec): key EC balance shards by (collection, volume id)
A numeric volume id can be reused across collections, and EC identity is
(collection, vid) (see store_ec_attach_reservation.go). The ecbalancer keyed
Node.shards by vid alone, so volumes sharing an id across collections merged into
one entry — letting dedup delete a "duplicate" that is actually a different
collection's shard, and letting moves act across collections. Key shards by
(collection, vid) throughout so each volume stays distinct.
* fix(ec): credit freed capacity from dedup before later balance phases
Dedup deletions are simulated only by applyMovesToTopology, which cleared shard
bits but did not return the freed disk/node/rack slots. Later phases reject
destinations with no free slots, so a slot opened by dedup could not be reused in
the same Plan/ec.balance run. applyMovesToTopology now credits the freed
disk/node/rack capacity for dedup moves (non-dedup moves still rely on the inline
accounting their phase already did).
* test(ec): add multi-disk EC balance integration test
Cover issue 9593 end-to-end at the unit level the old tests missed: build the
master's actual multi-disk wire format (same-type disks collapsed into one
DiskInfo, real DiskId only in per-shard records), run it through a real
ActiveTopology and the Detection entry point, then replay the planned moves with
the volume server's true semantics (node-wide VolumeEcShardsDelete) and assert no
EC shard is ever lost. Covers a balanced spread, a one-node-concentrated volume,
and a multi-rack spread, and asserts moves are safe (no same-node cross-disk),
correctly attributed to the source disk, and redistribute concentrated volumes
across both other racks and multiple destination disks.
* fix(ec): aggregate per-disk EC shards when verifying multi-disk volumes
collectEcNodeShardsInfo overwrote its per-server entry for each EcShardInfo of a
volume. A multi-disk node reports one EcShardInfo per physical disk holding shards
of the volume, so only the last disk's shards survived — the node looked like it
was missing shards it actually had. This made ec.encode's pre-delete verification
(and ec.decode) under-count volumes whose shards are spread across disks on one
server, falsely aborting the encode on multi-disk clusters. Union the per-disk
shard sets per server instead.
Also make verifyEcShardsBeforeDelete poll briefly: shard relocations reach the
master via volume-server heartbeats, so a freshly distributed shard set may not be
fully visible the instant the balance returns. Retry before concluding the set is
incomplete; genuine loss still fails after the retries are exhausted.
* test(ec): end-to-end multi-disk EC balance shard-loss regression
Start a real cluster of multi-disk volume servers (3 servers x 4 disks),
EC-encode a volume, run ec.balance, and assert hard invariants the prior
integration tests only logged: after encode all 14 shards exist, ec.balance loses
no shard, shards span more than one disk per node, and cluster.status counts
physical disks (not one per node). This reproduces issue 9593 end to end and would
have caught the multi-disk shard-aggregation bug fixed alongside it.
* fix(ec): bring EC balance worker/plugin path to parity with shell
- Per-volume serialization and phase order: key the plugin proposal dedupe by
(collection, volume) instead of (volume, shard, source), so the scheduler runs
only one of a volume's moves at a time (within a run and against in-flight jobs).
Concurrent same-volume moves raced on the volume's .ecx/.ecj/.vif sidecars; and
because the planner emits a volume's moves in phase order, they now execute in
order across detection cycles, matching the shell.
- disk_type "hdd": normalize via ToDiskType (hdd -> "" HardDriveType) while keeping
a "filter requested" flag, so disk_type=hdd matches the empty-keyed HDD disks
instead of nothing; apply the canonical type to planner options and move params.
- Replica placement: expose shard_replica_placement in the admin config form and
read it into the worker config, mirroring ec.balance -shardReplicaPlacement.
* test(ec): rename worker in-process test (not a real integration test)
The worker-package multi-disk tests build a fake master topology and simulate
move execution; they are not real-cluster integration tests. Rename
integration_test.go -> multidisk_detection_test.go and drop the Integration
prefix so 'integration' refers only to the real-cluster E2Es in test/erasure_coding.
* ci(ec): remove redundant ec-integration workflow
ec-integration.yml duplicated EC Integration Tests under the same workflow name
but ran only 'go test ec_integration_test.go' (one file), so it never ran new
test files (e.g. multidisk_shardloss_test.go) and was a strict, path-filtered
subset of ec-integration-tests.yml, which already runs 'go test -v' over the whole
test/erasure_coding package on every push/PR.
* fix(ec): worker falls back to master default replication for EC balance
For strict parity with the shell, the EC balance worker now uses the master's
configured default replication as the replica-placement fallback when no explicit
shard_replica_placement is set, instead of always defaulting to even spread.
The maintenance scanner reads it via GetMasterConfiguration each cycle and passes
it through ClusterInfo.DefaultReplicaPlacement; detection resolves the constraint
(explicit config wins, else master default, else none) in resolveReplicaPlacement.
A zero-replication default (the common 000 case) still means even spread, so the
common configuration is unchanged.
* fix(ec): plugin path populates master default replication too
The plugin worker built ClusterInfo with only ActiveTopology, so the master
default replication fallback added for the maintenance path never reached
plugin-driven EC balance detection — empty shard_replica_placement still meant
even spread there. Fetch the master default via GetMasterConfiguration (new
pluginworker.FetchDefaultReplicaPlacement) and set ClusterInfo.DefaultReplicaPlacement
so both detection paths resolve replica placement identically to the shell.
* docs(ec): empty shard replica placement uses master default, not even spread
The EC balance config text (admin plugin form, legacy form help text, and
the struct/proto field comments) still said an empty shard_replica_placement
spreads evenly. The runtime resolves empty to the master default replication
(resolveReplicaPlacement), matching shell ec.balance, with even spread only
when that default is empty or zero. Update the text to match and regenerate
worker_pb for the proto comment change.
|
||
|
Chris Lu
|
f256002d0b |
fix ec.balance failing to rebalance when all nodes share all volumes (#8796)
* fix ec.balance failing to rebalance when all nodes share all volumes (#8793) Two bugs in doBalanceEcRack prevented rebalancing: 1. Sorting by freeEcSlot instead of actual shard count caused incorrect empty/full node selection when nodes have different total capacities. 2. The volume-level check skipped any volume already present on the target node. When every node has a shard of every volume (common with many EC volumes across N nodes with N shards each), no moves were possible. Fix: sort by actual shard count, and use a two-pass approach - first prefer moving shards of volumes not on the target (best diversity), then fall back to moving specific shard IDs not yet on the target. * add test simulating real cluster topology from issue #8793 Uses the actual node addresses and mixed max capacities (80 vs 33) from the reporter's 14-node cluster to verify ec.balance correctly rebalances with heterogeneous node sizes. * fix pass comments to match 0-indexed loop variable |
||
Lisandro Pin
|
6b98b52acc |
Fix reporting of EC shard sizes from nodes to masters. (#7835)
SeaweedFS tracks EC shard sizes on topology data stuctures, but this information is never
relayed to master servers :( The end result is that commands reporting disk usage, such
as `volume.list` and `cluster.status`, yield incorrect figures when EC shards are present.
As an example for a simple 5-node test cluster, before...
```
> volume.list
Topology volumeSizeLimit:30000 MB hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
DataNode 192.168.10.111:9001 hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0)
Disk hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0) id:0
volume id:3 size:88967096 file_count:172 replica_placement:2 version:3 modified_at_second:1766349617
ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[1 5]
Disk hdd total size:88967096 file_count:172
DataNode 192.168.10.111:9001 total size:88967096 file_count:172
DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
DataNode 192.168.10.111:9002 hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0)
Disk hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0) id:0
volume id:2 size:77267536 file_count:166 replica_placement:2 version:3 modified_at_second:1766349617
volume id:3 size:88967096 file_count:172 replica_placement:2 version:3 modified_at_second:1766349617
ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[0 4]
Disk hdd total size:166234632 file_count:338
DataNode 192.168.10.111:9002 total size:166234632 file_count:338
DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
DataNode 192.168.10.111:9003 hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0)
Disk hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0) id:0
volume id:2 size:77267536 file_count:166 replica_placement:2 version:3 modified_at_second:1766349617
ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[2 6]
Disk hdd total size:77267536 file_count:166
DataNode 192.168.10.111:9003 total size:77267536 file_count:166
DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
DataNode 192.168.10.111:9004 hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0)
Disk hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0) id:0
volume id:2 size:77267536 file_count:166 replica_placement:2 version:3 modified_at_second:1766349617
volume id:3 size:88967096 file_count:172 replica_placement:2 version:3 modified_at_second:1766349617
ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[3 7]
Disk hdd total size:166234632 file_count:338
DataNode 192.168.10.111:9004 total size:166234632 file_count:338
DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
DataNode 192.168.10.111:9005 hdd(volume:0/8 active:0 free:8 remote:0)
Disk hdd(volume:0/8 active:0 free:8 remote:0) id:0
ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[8 9 10 11 12 13]
Disk hdd total size:0 file_count:0
Rack DefaultRack total size:498703896 file_count:1014
DataCenter DefaultDataCenter total size:498703896 file_count:1014
total size:498703896 file_count:1014
```
...and after:
```
> volume.list
Topology volumeSizeLimit:30000 MB hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
DataNode 192.168.10.111:9001 hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0)
Disk hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0) id:0
volume id:2 size:81761800 file_count:161 replica_placement:2 version:3 modified_at_second:1766349495
ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[1 5 9] sizes:[1:8.00 MiB 5:8.00 MiB 9:8.00 MiB] total:24.00 MiB
Disk hdd total size:81761800 file_count:161
DataNode 192.168.10.111:9001 total size:81761800 file_count:161
DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
DataNode 192.168.10.111:9002 hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0)
Disk hdd(volume:1/8 active:1 free:7 remote:0) id:0
volume id:3 size:88678712 file_count:170 replica_placement:2 version:3 modified_at_second:1766349495
ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[11 12 13] sizes:[11:8.00 MiB 12:8.00 MiB 13:8.00 MiB] total:24.00 MiB
Disk hdd total size:88678712 file_count:170
DataNode 192.168.10.111:9002 total size:88678712 file_count:170
DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
DataNode 192.168.10.111:9003 hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0)
Disk hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0) id:0
volume id:2 size:81761800 file_count:161 replica_placement:2 version:3 modified_at_second:1766349495
volume id:3 size:88678712 file_count:170 replica_placement:2 version:3 modified_at_second:1766349495
ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[0 4 8] sizes:[0:8.00 MiB 4:8.00 MiB 8:8.00 MiB] total:24.00 MiB
Disk hdd total size:170440512 file_count:331
DataNode 192.168.10.111:9003 total size:170440512 file_count:331
DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
DataNode 192.168.10.111:9004 hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0)
Disk hdd(volume:2/8 active:2 free:6 remote:0) id:0
volume id:2 size:81761800 file_count:161 replica_placement:2 version:3 modified_at_second:1766349495
volume id:3 size:88678712 file_count:170 replica_placement:2 version:3 modified_at_second:1766349495
ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[2 6 10] sizes:[2:8.00 MiB 6:8.00 MiB 10:8.00 MiB] total:24.00 MiB
Disk hdd total size:170440512 file_count:331
DataNode 192.168.10.111:9004 total size:170440512 file_count:331
DataCenter DefaultDataCenter hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
Rack DefaultRack hdd(volume:6/40 active:6 free:33 remote:0)
DataNode 192.168.10.111:9005 hdd(volume:0/8 active:0 free:8 remote:0)
Disk hdd(volume:0/8 active:0 free:8 remote:0) id:0
ec volume id:1 collection: shards:[3 7] sizes:[3:8.00 MiB 7:8.00 MiB] total:16.00 MiB
Disk hdd total size:0 file_count:0
Rack DefaultRack total size:511321536 file_count:993
DataCenter DefaultDataCenter total size:511321536 file_count:993
total size:511321536 file_count:993
```
|
||
|
Chris Lu
|
4aa50bfa6a |
fix: EC rebalance fails with replica placement 000 (#7812)
* fix: EC rebalance fails with replica placement 000 This PR fixes several issues with EC shard distribution: 1. Pre-flight check before EC encoding - Verify target disk type has capacity before encoding starts - Prevents encoding shards only to fail during rebalance - Shows helpful error when wrong diskType is specified (e.g., ssd when volumes are on hdd) 2. Fix EC rebalance with replica placement 000 - When DiffRackCount=0, shards should be distributed freely across racks - The '000' placement means 'no volume replication needed' because EC provides redundancy - Previously all racks were skipped with error 'shards X > replica placement limit (0)' 3. Add unit tests for EC rebalance slot calculation - TestECRebalanceWithLimitedSlots: documents the limited slots scenario - TestECRebalanceZeroFreeSlots: reproduces the 0 free slots error 4. Add Makefile for manual EC testing - make setup: start cluster and populate data - make shell: open weed shell for EC commands - make clean: stop cluster and cleanup * fix: default -rebalance to true for ec.encode The -rebalance flag was defaulting to false, which meant ec.encode would only print shard moves but not actually execute them. This is a poor default since the whole point of EC encoding is to distribute shards across servers for fault tolerance. Now -rebalance defaults to true, so shards are actually distributed after encoding. Users can use -rebalance=false if they only want to see what would happen without making changes. * test/erasure_coding: improve Makefile safety and docs - Narrow pkill pattern for volume servers to use TEST_DIR instead of port pattern, avoiding accidental kills of unrelated SeaweedFS processes - Document external dependencies (curl, jq) in header comments * shell: refactor buildRackWithEcShards to reuse buildEcShards Extract common shard bit construction logic to avoid duplication between buildEcShards and buildRackWithEcShards helper functions. * shell: update test for EC replication 000 behavior When DiffRackCount=0 (replication "000"), EC shards should be distributed freely across racks since erasure coding provides its own redundancy. Update test expectation to reflect this behavior. * erasure_coding: add distribution package for proportional EC shard placement Add a new reusable package for EC shard distribution that: - Supports configurable EC ratios (not hard-coded 10+4) - Distributes shards proportionally based on replication policy - Provides fault tolerance analysis - Prefers moving parity shards to keep data shards spread out Key components: - ECConfig: Configurable data/parity shard counts - ReplicationConfig: Parsed XYZ replication policy - ECDistribution: Target shard counts per DC/rack/node - Rebalancer: Plans shard moves with parity-first strategy This enables seaweed-enterprise custom EC ratios and weed worker integration while maintaining a clean, testable architecture. * shell: integrate distribution package for EC rebalancing Add shell wrappers around the distribution package: - ProportionalECRebalancer: Plans moves using distribution.Rebalancer - NewProportionalECRebalancerWithConfig: Supports custom EC configs - GetDistributionSummary/GetFaultToleranceAnalysis: Helper functions The shell layer converts between EcNode types and the generic TopologyNode types used by the distribution package. * test setup * ec: improve data and parity shard distribution across racks - Add shardsByTypePerRack helper to track data vs parity shards - Rewrite doBalanceEcShardsAcrossRacks for two-pass balancing: 1. Balance data shards (0-9) evenly, max ceil(10/6)=2 per rack 2. Balance parity shards (10-13) evenly, max ceil(4/6)=1 per rack - Add balanceShardTypeAcrossRacks for generic shard type balancing - Add pickRackForShardType to select destination with room for type - Add unit tests for even data/parity distribution verification This ensures even read load during normal operation by spreading both data and parity shards across all available racks. * ec: make data/parity shard counts configurable in ecBalancer - Add dataShardCount and parityShardCount fields to ecBalancer struct - Add getDataShardCount() and getParityShardCount() methods with defaults - Replace direct constant usage with configurable methods - Fix unused variable warning for parityPerRack This allows seaweed-enterprise to use custom EC ratios while defaulting to standard 10+4 scheme. * Address PR 7812 review comments Makefile improvements: - Save PIDs for each volume server for precise termination - Use PID-based killing in stop target with pkill fallback - Use more specific pkill patterns with TEST_DIR paths Documentation: - Document jq dependency in README.md Rebalancer fix: - Fix duplicate shard count updates in applyMovesToAnalysis - All planners (DC/rack/node) update counts inline during planning - Remove duplicate updates from applyMovesToAnalysis to avoid double-counting * test/erasure_coding: use mktemp for test file template Use mktemp instead of hardcoded /tmp/testfile_template.bin path to provide better isolation for concurrent test runs. |
||
|
Chris Lu
|
df4f2f7020 |
ec: add -diskType flag to EC commands for SSD support (#7607)
* ec: add diskType parameter to core EC functions
Add diskType parameter to:
- ecBalancer struct
- collectEcVolumeServersByDc()
- collectEcNodesForDC()
- collectEcNodes()
- EcBalance()
This allows EC operations to target specific disk types (hdd, ssd, etc.)
instead of being hardcoded to HardDriveType only.
For backward compatibility, all callers currently pass types.HardDriveType
as the default value. Subsequent commits will add -diskType flags to
the individual EC commands.
* ec: update helper functions to use configurable diskType
Update the following functions to accept/use diskType parameter:
- findEcVolumeShards()
- addEcVolumeShards()
- deleteEcVolumeShards()
- moveMountedShardToEcNode()
- countShardsByRack()
- pickNEcShardsToMoveFrom()
All ecBalancer methods now use ecb.diskType instead of hardcoded
types.HardDriveType. Non-ecBalancer callers (like volumeServer.evacuate
and ec.rebuild) use types.HardDriveType as the default.
Update all test files to pass diskType where needed.
* ec: add -diskType flag to ec.balance and ec.encode commands
Add -diskType flag to specify the target disk type for EC operations:
- ec.balance -diskType=ssd
- ec.encode -diskType=ssd
The disk type can be 'hdd', 'ssd', or empty for default (hdd).
This allows placing EC shards on SSD or other disk types instead of
only HDD.
Example usage:
ec.balance -collection=mybucket -diskType=ssd -apply
ec.encode -collection=mybucket -diskType=ssd -force
* test: add integration tests for EC disk type support
Add integration tests to verify the -diskType flag works correctly:
- TestECDiskTypeSupport: Tests EC encode and balance with SSD disk type
- TestECDiskTypeMixedCluster: Tests EC operations on a mixed HDD/SSD cluster
The tests verify:
- Volume servers can be configured with specific disk types
- ec.encode accepts -diskType flag and encodes to the correct disk type
- ec.balance accepts -diskType flag and balances on the correct disk type
- Mixed disk type clusters work correctly with separate collections
* ec: add -sourceDiskType to ec.encode and -diskType to ec.decode
ec.encode:
- Add -sourceDiskType flag to filter source volumes by disk type
- This enables tier migration scenarios (e.g., SSD volumes → HDD EC shards)
- -diskType specifies target disk type for EC shards
ec.decode:
- Add -diskType flag to specify source disk type where EC shards are stored
- Update collectEcShardIds() and collectEcNodeShardBits() to accept diskType
Examples:
# Encode SSD volumes to HDD EC shards (tier migration)
ec.encode -collection=mybucket -sourceDiskType=ssd -diskType=hdd
# Decode EC shards from SSD
ec.decode -collection=mybucket -diskType=ssd
Integration tests updated to cover new flags.
* ec: fix variable shadowing and add -diskType to ec.rebuild and volumeServer.evacuate
Address code review comments:
1. Fix variable shadowing in collectEcVolumeServersByDc():
- Rename loop variable 'diskType' to 'diskTypeKey' and 'diskTypeStr'
to avoid shadowing the function parameter
2. Fix hardcoded HardDriveType in ecBalancer methods:
- balanceEcRack(): use ecb.diskType instead of types.HardDriveType
- collectVolumeIdToEcNodes(): use ecb.diskType
3. Add -diskType flag to ec.rebuild command:
- Add diskType field to ecRebuilder struct
- Pass diskType to collectEcNodes() and addEcVolumeShards()
4. Add -diskType flag to volumeServer.evacuate command:
- Add diskType field to commandVolumeServerEvacuate struct
- Pass diskType to collectEcVolumeServersByDc() and moveMountedShardToEcNode()
* test: add diskType field to ecBalancer in TestPickEcNodeToBalanceShardsInto
Address nitpick comment: ensure test ecBalancer struct has diskType
field set for consistency with other tests.
* ec: filter disk selection by disk type in pickBestDiskOnNode
When evacuating or rebalancing EC shards, pickBestDiskOnNode now
filters disks by the target disk type. This ensures:
1. EC shards from SSD disks are moved to SSD disks on destination nodes
2. EC shards from HDD disks are moved to HDD disks on destination nodes
3. No cross-disk-type shard movement occurs
This maintains the storage tier isolation when moving EC shards
between nodes during evacuation or rebalancing operations.
* ec: allow disk type fallback during evacuation
Update pickBestDiskOnNode to accept a strictDiskType parameter:
- strictDiskType=true (balancing): Only use disks of matching type.
This maintains storage tier isolation during normal rebalancing.
- strictDiskType=false (evacuation): Prefer same disk type, but
fall back to other disk types if no matching disk is available.
This ensures evacuation can complete even when same-type capacity
is insufficient.
Priority order for evacuation:
1. Same disk type with lowest shard count (preferred)
2. Different disk type with lowest shard count (fallback)
* test: use defer for lock/unlock to prevent lock leaks
Use defer to ensure locks are always released, even on early returns
or test failures. This prevents lock leaks that could cause subsequent
tests to hang or fail.
Changes:
- Return early if lock acquisition fails
- Immediately defer unlock after successful lock
- Remove redundant explicit unlock calls at end of tests
- Fix unused variable warning (err -> encodeErr/locErr)
* ec: dynamically discover disk types from topology for evacuation
Disk types are free-form tags (e.g., 'ssd', 'nvme', 'archive') that come
from the topology, not a hardcoded set. Only 'hdd' (or empty) is the
default disk type.
Use collectVolumeDiskTypes() to discover all disk types present in the
cluster topology instead of hardcoding [HardDriveType, SsdType].
* test: add evacuation fallback and cross-rack EC placement tests
Add two new integration tests:
1. TestEvacuationFallbackBehavior:
- Tests that when same disk type has no capacity, shards fall back
to other disk types during evacuation
- Creates cluster with 1 SSD + 2 HDD servers (limited SSD capacity)
- Verifies pickBestDiskOnNode behavior with strictDiskType=false
2. TestCrossRackECPlacement:
- Tests EC shard distribution across different racks
- Creates cluster with 4 servers in 4 different racks
- Verifies shards are spread across multiple racks
- Tests that ec.balance respects rack placement
Helper functions added:
- startLimitedSsdCluster: 1 SSD + 2 HDD servers
- startMultiRackCluster: 4 servers in 4 racks
- countShardsPerRack: counts EC shards per rack from disk
* test: fix collection mismatch in TestCrossRackECPlacement
The EC commands were using collection 'rack_test' but uploaded test data
uses collection 'test' (default). This caused ec.encode/ec.balance to not
find the uploaded volume.
Fix: Change EC commands to use '-collection test' to match the uploaded data.
Addresses review comment from PR #7607.
* test: close log files in MultiDiskCluster.Stop() to prevent FD leaks
Track log files in MultiDiskCluster.logFiles and close them in Stop()
to prevent file descriptor accumulation in long-running or many-test
scenarios.
Addresses review comment about logging resources cleanup.
* test: improve EC integration tests with proper assertions
- Add assertNoFlagError helper to detect flag parsing regressions
- Update diskType subtests to fail on flag errors (ec.encode, ec.balance, ec.decode)
- Update verify_disktype_flag_parsing to check help output contains diskType
- Remove verify_fallback_disk_selection (was documentation-only, not executable)
- Add assertion to verify_cross_rack_distribution for minimum 2 racks
- Consolidate uploadTestDataWithDiskType to accept collection parameter
- Remove duplicate uploadTestDataWithDiskTypeMixed function
* test: extract captureCommandOutput helper and fix error handling
- Add captureCommandOutput helper to reduce code duplication in diskType tests
- Create commandRunner interface to match shell command Do method
- Update ec_encode_with_ssd_disktype, ec_balance_with_ssd_disktype,
ec_encode_with_source_disktype, ec_decode_with_disktype to use helper
- Fix filepath.Glob error handling in countShardsPerRack instead of ignoring it
* test: add flag validation to ec_balance_targets_correct_disk_type
Add assertNoFlagError calls after ec.balance commands to ensure
-diskType flag is properly recognized for both SSD and HDD disk types.
* test: add proper assertions for EC command results
- ec_encode_with_ssd_disktype: check for expected volume-related errors
- ec_balance_with_ssd_disktype: require success with require.NoError
- ec_encode_with_source_disktype: check for expected no-volume errors
- ec_decode_with_disktype: check for expected no-ec-volume errors
- upload_to_ssd_and_hdd: use require.NoError for setup validation
Tests now properly fail on unexpected errors rather than just logging.
* test: fix missing unlock in ec_encode_with_disk_awareness
Add defer unlock pattern to ensure lock is always released, matching
the pattern used in other subtests.
* test: improve helper robustness
- Make assertNoFlagError case-insensitive for pattern matching
- Use defer in captureCommandOutput to restore stdout/stderr and close
pipe ends to avoid FD leaks even if cmd.Do panics
|
||
|
Lisandro Pin
|
6320036c56 |
Delete legacy balancing code for ec.encode. (#6344)
|
||
|
Lisandro Pin
|
34cdbdd279 |
Share common parameters for EC re-balancing functions under a single struct. (#6319)
TODO cleanup for https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs/discussions/6179. |
||
|
Lisandro Pin
|
351efa134d | Account for replication placement settings when balancing EC shards across racks. (#6316) | ||
|
Lisandro Pin
|
f2db746690 |
Introduce logic to resolve volume replica placement within EC rebalancing. (#6254)
* Rename `command_ec_encode_test.go` to `command_ec_common_test.go`. All tests defined in this file are now for `command_ec_common.go`. * Minor code cleanups. - Fix broken `ec.balance` test. - Rework integer ceiling division to not use floats, which can introduce precision errors. * Introduce logic to resolve volume replica placement within EC rebalancing. This will be used to make rebalancing logic topology-aware. * Give shell.EcNode.dc a dedicated DataCenterId type. |
||
chrislu
|
26dbc6c905 | move to https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs | ||
|
Chris Lu
|
3575d41009 | go fmt | ||
|
Chris Lu
|
68775d29e3 | fix tests | ||
|
Chris Lu
|
86cce3eb58 | fix test | ||
|
Chris Lu
|
892e726eb9 |
avoid reusing context object
fix https://github.com/chrislusf/seaweedfs/issues/1182 |
||
|
Chris Lu
|
3ebeae0c0b | ec encode distribute ec data and parity shards evenly | ||
|
Chris Lu
|
f9d8bd51ad | ec shard balancing |