mirror of
https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs.git
synced 2026-07-19 06:22:31 +00:00
42030381ae
* shell: volume.tier.move can move volumes between data centers -fromDataCenter scopes volume selection to volumes with a replica in that data center. -toDataCenter constrains move destinations and replication fulfillment. With identical disk types both flags are required, moving full volumes between data centers on the same tier. * shell: assert node identity in data center filter test * shell: tier move resumes when the volume is already on the target A replica already on the target tier and data center, typically left by an interrupted earlier run, anchors the move: skip the copy and only complete replication fulfillment and old replica cleanup. Previously such volumes hit the no-destination path and the stale source replicas were never removed.
467 lines
15 KiB
Go
467 lines
15 KiB
Go
package shell
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs/weed/storage/types"
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs/weed/pb/master_pb"
|
|
"github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs/weed/storage/super_block"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
type testMoveCase struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
replication string
|
|
replicas []*VolumeReplica
|
|
sourceLocation location
|
|
targetLocation location
|
|
expected bool
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestIsGoodMove(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
var tests = []testMoveCase{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
name: "test 100 move to wrong data centers",
|
|
replication: "100",
|
|
replicas: []*VolumeReplica{
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn1"}},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc2", "r2", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn2"}},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
sourceLocation: location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn1"}},
|
|
targetLocation: location{"dc2", "r3", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn3"}},
|
|
expected: false,
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
name: "test 100 move to spread into proper data centers",
|
|
replication: "100",
|
|
replicas: []*VolumeReplica{
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn1"}},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r2", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn2"}},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
sourceLocation: location{"dc1", "r2", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn2"}},
|
|
targetLocation: location{"dc2", "r2", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn3"}},
|
|
expected: true,
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
name: "test move to the same node",
|
|
replication: "001",
|
|
replicas: []*VolumeReplica{
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn1"}},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn2"}},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
sourceLocation: location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn2"}},
|
|
targetLocation: location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn2"}},
|
|
expected: false,
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
name: "test move to the same rack, but existing node",
|
|
replication: "001",
|
|
replicas: []*VolumeReplica{
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn1"}},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn2"}},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
sourceLocation: location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn2"}},
|
|
targetLocation: location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn1"}},
|
|
expected: false,
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
name: "test move to the same rack, a new node",
|
|
replication: "001",
|
|
replicas: []*VolumeReplica{
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn1"}},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn2"}},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
sourceLocation: location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn2"}},
|
|
targetLocation: location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn3"}},
|
|
expected: true,
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
name: "test 010 move all to the same rack",
|
|
replication: "010",
|
|
replicas: []*VolumeReplica{
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn1"}},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r2", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn2"}},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
sourceLocation: location{"dc1", "r2", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn2"}},
|
|
targetLocation: location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn3"}},
|
|
expected: false,
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
name: "test 010 move to spread racks",
|
|
replication: "010",
|
|
replicas: []*VolumeReplica{
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn1"}},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r2", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn2"}},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
sourceLocation: location{"dc1", "r2", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn2"}},
|
|
targetLocation: location{"dc1", "r3", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn3"}},
|
|
expected: true,
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
name: "test 010 move to spread racks",
|
|
replication: "010",
|
|
replicas: []*VolumeReplica{
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn1"}},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r2", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn2"}},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
sourceLocation: location{"dc1", "r2", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn2"}},
|
|
targetLocation: location{"dc1", "r2", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn3"}},
|
|
expected: true,
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
name: "test 011 switch which rack has more replicas",
|
|
replication: "011",
|
|
replicas: []*VolumeReplica{
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn1"}},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn2"}},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r2", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn3"}},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
sourceLocation: location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn1"}},
|
|
targetLocation: location{"dc1", "r2", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn4"}},
|
|
expected: true,
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
name: "test 011 move the lonely replica to another racks",
|
|
replication: "011",
|
|
replicas: []*VolumeReplica{
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn1"}},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn2"}},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r2", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn3"}},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
sourceLocation: location{"dc1", "r2", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn3"}},
|
|
targetLocation: location{"dc1", "r3", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn4"}},
|
|
expected: true,
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
name: "test 011 move to wrong racks",
|
|
replication: "011",
|
|
replicas: []*VolumeReplica{
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn1"}},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn2"}},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r2", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn3"}},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
sourceLocation: location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn1"}},
|
|
targetLocation: location{"dc1", "r3", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn4"}},
|
|
expected: false,
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
name: "test 011 move all to the same rack",
|
|
replication: "011",
|
|
replicas: []*VolumeReplica{
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn1"}},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn2"}},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r2", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn3"}},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
sourceLocation: location{"dc1", "r2", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn3"}},
|
|
targetLocation: location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "dn4"}},
|
|
expected: false,
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
// rep 001 allows two copies in one rack; replica-placement alone would
|
|
// permit this, but the target shares a host with another replica, so the
|
|
// machine anti-affinity must reject it.
|
|
name: "test 001 reject move onto a machine already holding a replica",
|
|
replication: "001",
|
|
replicas: []*VolumeReplica{
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "10.0.0.1:8080"}},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "10.0.0.2:8080"}},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
sourceLocation: location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "10.0.0.2:8080"}},
|
|
targetLocation: location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "10.0.0.1:8081"}},
|
|
expected: false,
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
name: "test 001 allow move onto a different machine in the rack",
|
|
replication: "001",
|
|
replicas: []*VolumeReplica{
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "10.0.0.1:8080"}},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
location: &location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "10.0.0.2:8080"}},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
sourceLocation: location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "10.0.0.2:8080"}},
|
|
targetLocation: location{"dc1", "r1", &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{Id: "10.0.0.3:8080"}},
|
|
expected: true,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, tt := range tests {
|
|
replicaPlacement, _ := super_block.NewReplicaPlacementFromString(tt.replication)
|
|
println("replication:", tt.replication, "expected", tt.expected, "name:", tt.name)
|
|
sourceNode := &Node{
|
|
info: tt.sourceLocation.dataNode,
|
|
dc: tt.sourceLocation.dc,
|
|
rack: tt.sourceLocation.rack,
|
|
}
|
|
targetNode := &Node{
|
|
info: tt.targetLocation.dataNode,
|
|
dc: tt.targetLocation.dc,
|
|
rack: tt.targetLocation.rack,
|
|
}
|
|
if isGoodMove(replicaPlacement, tt.replicas, sourceNode, targetNode) != tt.expected {
|
|
t.Errorf("%s: expect %v move from %v to %s, replication:%v",
|
|
tt.name, tt.expected, tt.sourceLocation, tt.targetLocation, tt.replication)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestBalance(t *testing.T) {
|
|
topologyInfo := parseOutput(topoData)
|
|
volumeServers := collectVolumeServersByDcRackNode(topologyInfo, "", "", "")
|
|
volumeReplicas, _ := collectVolumeReplicaLocations(topologyInfo)
|
|
diskTypes := collectVolumeDiskTypes(topologyInfo)
|
|
c := &commandVolumeBalance{}
|
|
if err := c.balanceVolumeServers(diskTypes, volumeReplicas, volumeServers, nil, "ALL_COLLECTIONS"); err != nil {
|
|
t.Errorf("balance: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Regression test: a freshly added empty volume server must end up sharing the
|
|
// data roughly evenly, not having every volume drained onto it. Before the fix,
|
|
// adjustAfterMove never updated the per-disk VolumeInfos that the density-based
|
|
// capacity function reads, so the planner saw a stale topology and moved every
|
|
// volume from the full node onto the empty one.
|
|
func TestBalanceDoesNotDrainOntoOneNode(t *testing.T) {
|
|
const mb = 1024 * 1024
|
|
volumeSizeLimitMb := uint64(100)
|
|
|
|
makeNode := func(id string, volumes []*master_pb.VolumeInformationMessage) *Node {
|
|
return &Node{
|
|
info: &master_pb.DataNodeInfo{
|
|
Id: id,
|
|
DiskInfos: map[string]*master_pb.DiskInfo{
|
|
"": {
|
|
MaxVolumeCount: 10,
|
|
VolumeCount: int64(len(volumes)),
|
|
VolumeInfos: volumes,
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
dc: "dc1",
|
|
rack: "rack1",
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var fullVolumes []*master_pb.VolumeInformationMessage
|
|
for id := uint32(1); id <= 6; id++ {
|
|
fullVolumes = append(fullVolumes, &master_pb.VolumeInformationMessage{Id: id, Size: 95 * mb})
|
|
}
|
|
fullNode := makeNode("full", fullVolumes)
|
|
emptyNode := makeNode("empty", nil)
|
|
nodes := []*Node{fullNode, emptyNode}
|
|
|
|
volumeReplicas := map[uint32][]*VolumeReplica{}
|
|
for _, v := range fullVolumes {
|
|
loc := newLocation("dc1", "rack1", fullNode.info)
|
|
volumeReplicas[v.Id] = []*VolumeReplica{{location: &loc, info: v}}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, n := range nodes {
|
|
n.selectVolumes(func(v *master_pb.VolumeInformationMessage) bool { return true })
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if err := balanceSelectedVolume(nil, types.HardDriveType, volumeReplicas, nodes, sortWritableVolumes, volumeSizeLimitMb, false); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("balanceSelectedVolume: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fullCount := len(fullNode.info.DiskInfos[""].VolumeInfos)
|
|
emptyCount := len(emptyNode.info.DiskInfos[""].VolumeInfos)
|
|
if fullCount == 0 || emptyCount == 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected volumes spread across both nodes, got full=%d empty=%d", fullCount, emptyCount)
|
|
}
|
|
if diff := fullCount - emptyCount; diff > 1 || diff < -1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected balanced distribution within one volume, got full=%d empty=%d", fullCount, emptyCount)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestVolumeSelection(t *testing.T) {
|
|
topologyInfo := parseOutput(topoData)
|
|
|
|
vids, err := collectVolumeIdsForTierChange(topologyInfo, 1000, types.ToDiskType(types.HddType), "", "", 20.0, 0)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Errorf("collectVolumeIdsForTierChange: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
assert.Equal(t, 378, len(vids))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestDeleteEmptySelection(t *testing.T) {
|
|
topologyInfo := parseOutput(topoData)
|
|
|
|
eachDataNode(topologyInfo, func(dc DataCenterId, rack RackId, dn *master_pb.DataNodeInfo) {
|
|
for _, diskInfo := range dn.DiskInfos {
|
|
for _, v := range diskInfo.VolumeInfos {
|
|
if v.Size <= super_block.SuperBlockSize && v.ModifiedAtSecond > 0 {
|
|
fmt.Printf("empty volume %d from %s\n", v.Id, dn.Id)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestSplitCSVSet(t *testing.T) {
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
in string
|
|
want map[string]bool
|
|
}{
|
|
{"empty input is empty set (no filter)", "", map[string]bool{}},
|
|
{"whitespace only is empty set (no filter)", " ", map[string]bool{}},
|
|
{"commas only is empty set (no filter)", ",,,", map[string]bool{}},
|
|
{"whitespace and commas only is empty set (no filter)", " , , ", map[string]bool{}},
|
|
{"single", "rack1", map[string]bool{"rack1": true}},
|
|
{"multi", "rack1,rack2", map[string]bool{"rack1": true, "rack2": true}},
|
|
{"trims whitespace", " rack1 , rack2 ", map[string]bool{"rack1": true, "rack2": true}},
|
|
{"skips empty items", "rack1,,rack2,", map[string]bool{"rack1": true, "rack2": true}},
|
|
}
|
|
for _, tc := range tests {
|
|
t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
assert.Equal(t, tc.want, splitCSVSet(tc.in))
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Regression test for the rack/node filter that previously used
|
|
// strings.Contains, which falsely matched any id that was a substring of the
|
|
// user-supplied flag value (e.g. -racks=rack10 also matched rack1).
|
|
func TestCollectVolumeServersByDcRackNode_RackFilter(t *testing.T) {
|
|
topo := &master_pb.TopologyInfo{
|
|
DataCenterInfos: []*master_pb.DataCenterInfo{{
|
|
Id: "dc1",
|
|
RackInfos: []*master_pb.RackInfo{
|
|
{Id: "rack1", DataNodeInfos: []*master_pb.DataNodeInfo{{Id: "n1"}}},
|
|
{Id: "rack10", DataNodeInfos: []*master_pb.DataNodeInfo{{Id: "n10"}}},
|
|
{Id: "rack2", DataNodeInfos: []*master_pb.DataNodeInfo{{Id: "n2"}}},
|
|
},
|
|
}},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
got := collectVolumeServersByDcRackNode(topo, "", "rack10", "")
|
|
if assert.Len(t, got, 1, "-racks=rack10 should not match rack1") {
|
|
assert.Equal(t, "rack10", got[0].rack)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
got = collectVolumeServersByDcRackNode(topo, "", "rack1,rack2", "")
|
|
racks := map[string]bool{}
|
|
for _, n := range got {
|
|
racks[n.rack] = true
|
|
}
|
|
assert.Equal(t, map[string]bool{"rack1": true, "rack2": true}, racks,
|
|
"-racks=rack1,rack2 should match exactly those two, not rack10")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Regression test for the -nodes filter, mirroring the rack-filter case.
|
|
// Uses bare ids (no :port suffix) so that "node1" is a true substring of
|
|
// "node10": under the old strings.Contains implementation,
|
|
// -nodes=node10 wrongly included node1 as well.
|
|
func TestCollectVolumeServersByDcRackNode_NodeFilter(t *testing.T) {
|
|
topo := &master_pb.TopologyInfo{
|
|
DataCenterInfos: []*master_pb.DataCenterInfo{{
|
|
Id: "dc1",
|
|
RackInfos: []*master_pb.RackInfo{{
|
|
Id: "rack1",
|
|
DataNodeInfos: []*master_pb.DataNodeInfo{
|
|
{Id: "node1"},
|
|
{Id: "node10"},
|
|
{Id: "node2"},
|
|
},
|
|
}},
|
|
}},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
got := collectVolumeServersByDcRackNode(topo, "", "", "node10")
|
|
if assert.Len(t, got, 1, "-nodes=node10 should not match node1") {
|
|
assert.Equal(t, "node10", got[0].info.Id)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
got = collectVolumeServersByDcRackNode(topo, "", "", "node1,node2")
|
|
nodes := map[string]bool{}
|
|
for _, n := range got {
|
|
nodes[n.info.Id] = true
|
|
}
|
|
assert.Equal(t, map[string]bool{"node1": true, "node2": true}, nodes,
|
|
"-nodes=node1,node2 should match exactly those two, not node10")
|
|
}
|