mirror of
https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs.git
synced 2026-09-24 00:44:18 +00:00
Chris Lu
6848cdf9e1
* s3: count seaweedfs-quota as an operation subresource PUT /bucket?policy&seaweedfs-quota was not rejected by hasAmbiguousSubresource because operationSubresources omitted the seaweedfs-quota key. The router then picks the policy route (registered first) while the IAM action resolver may resolve the request to s3:PutBucketQuota, letting a quota-only identity write a bucket policy. Reject the combination before routing, matching the fix for policy&tagging (#10987). * s3: resolve seaweedfs-quota after other bucket subresources The quota routes are registered last among the bucket subresource routes, but the action resolver found seaweedfs-quota inside the unordered bucketQueryActions map, so a request carrying it alongside another selector could be authorized as the quota operation while the router served the earlier-registered handler. Resolve it explicitly at the end so the resolver agrees with the router, mirroring how list-type is handled. * s3: count resolver subresources in the ambiguity guard hasAmbiguousSubresource only counted operationSubresources, so adding a query parameter to the action resolver without updating that list reopened the authorize-one-serve-another gap. Count bucketQueryActions keys as operation selectors too, and add a test that walks the registered routes and fails on any query key that is neither an operation subresource nor a known modifier.