mirror of
https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs.git
synced 2026-09-26 01:44:48 +00:00
Chris LuandGitHub
9d5525e747
* master: keep the periodic growth scan to data centers hosting the layout The rack-aware scan planned growth for every data center in the topology, so a collection pinned to one DC (fs.configure -dataCenter) sprouted volumes in all the others within one scan cycle. Plan only for data centers already hosting the layout's volumes; an empty DC gets its volumes from the DC-constrained assign that first asks for them. The lastGrowCount divisor likewise counts only the racks the scan can plan for. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01J22TVTyoCMzdHyJirsLMG5 * master: pin periodic must-grow growth to a single-DC layout's data center The must-grow and crowded paths of the periodic loop grow with no DataCenter, so even with the scan fixed a pinned collection's volumes could still land in any DC once lastGrowCount demands more writables. Stamp the grow request with the layout's data center when its volumes all live in one; layouts spanning DCs keep unconstrained growth. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01J22TVTyoCMzdHyJirsLMG5 * master: never pin growth of a cross-DC-replicated layout A layout whose replication spans data centers cannot legitimately live in one DC; observing a single hosting DC there means the other DCs are down. Do not encode that outage as a placement constraint. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01J22TVTyoCMzdHyJirsLMG5 * master: bound the hosting-DC walk by the answer it needs listVolumeDataCenters walked every location of the layout under accessLock — ~190ms for a million volumes, twice per layout per cycle, stalling assigns behind the read lock. Stop once enough distinct DCs answer the caller's question: two for the single-DC check, the topology's DC count for the scan. A spanning million-volume layout now finishes in microseconds; only a layout truly confined to fewer DCs still pays a full walk, the same cost class as the under-replication count this loop already takes each cycle. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01J22TVTyoCMzdHyJirsLMG5