Files
seaweedfs/sw-block
pingqiuandClaude Opus 4.6 a79cba0be7 fix: PlanRebuild targetLSN=0 when replica is degraded (CommittedLSN fallback)
Root cause: StatusSnapshot().CommittedLSN reports 0 in sync_all mode when
the replica shipper has no flushed progress (NeedsRebuild state). This is
correct for lineage-safe committed boundary, but PlanRebuild uses
CommittedLSN as RebuildTargetLSN. With target=0, shouldStartSessionCommand
rejects the StartRebuildCommand, and the rebuild IO never executes.

Fix: PlanRebuild falls back to HeadLSN when CommittedLSN is 0. The
primary's WAL head IS the data boundary the replica needs to reach.
The fact that no replica has confirmed durability is exactly why we're
rebuilding.

Also adds command type logging to coreApplyAndLog so tester can verify
which commands are actually emitted vs silently dropped.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-09 15:35:31 -07:00
..

sw-block

Private WAL V2 and standalone block-service workspace.

Purpose:

  • keep WAL V2 design/prototype work isolated from WAL V1 production code in weed/storage/blockvol
  • allow private design notes and experiments to evolve without polluting V1 delivery paths
  • keep the future standalone sw-block product structure clean enough to split into a separate repo later if needed

Suggested layout:

  • design/: shared V2 design docs
  • prototype/: code prototypes and experiments
  • .private/: private notes, phase development, roadmap, and non-public working material

Repository direction:

  • current state: sw-block/ is an isolated workspace inside seaweedfs
  • likely future state: sw-block becomes a standalone sibling repo/product
  • design and prototype structure should therefore stay product-oriented and not depend on SeaweedFS-specific paths