Files
seaweedfs/sw-block
pingqiuandClaude Opus 4.7 a8b0999c45 v3-batch-process §12: ownership table
Codifies who owns each step based on what actually worked in T4 + G5:

  - Gate scope: architect
  - Batch sketch (mini-plan §1-§6): sw
  - G-1 V2 read (when V2 PORT): sw
  - Mini-plan ratification: architect signs + QA reviews
  - Code + unit tests: sw
  - Component scenarios + m01 verification: QA
  - Ledger inscription (PR-atomic): sw
  - §close append: sw drafts + QA verifies
  - Close sign: architect single-sign

Why sw plans (not architect):
  - Knows code feasibility + framework state
  - Self-commits to deliverable scope (fewer revision cycles)
  - Architect ratifies SCOPE but doesn't need implementation detail
    (caught 2 binding clarifications at G5-4 v0.2→v0.3 — that's the
    right level of architect involvement)

Why QA reviews (doesn't plan):
  - Independent third party (not scope or implementation advocate)
  - Catches discipline gaps sw + architect miss
  - Owns m01 hardware + component scenarios

Edge cases:
  - Process changes (this doc): QA proposes; architect signs
  - Hotfix-class (§6.3): sw self-authors + self-merges; QA spot-reviews;
    architect ratifies if invariant-affecting

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-26 20:31:51 -07:00
..

sw-block

Private WAL V2 and standalone block-service workspace.

Purpose:

  • keep WAL V2 design/prototype work isolated from WAL V1 production code in weed/storage/blockvol
  • allow private design notes and experiments to evolve without polluting V1 delivery paths
  • keep the future standalone sw-block product structure clean enough to split into a separate repo later if needed

Suggested layout:

  • design/: shared V2 design docs
  • prototype/: code prototypes and experiments
  • .private/: private notes, phase development, roadmap, and non-public working material

Repository direction:

  • current state: sw-block/ is an isolated workspace inside seaweedfs
  • likely future state: sw-block becomes a standalone sibling repo/product
  • design and prototype structure should therefore stay product-oriented and not depend on SeaweedFS-specific paths