mirror of
https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs.git
synced 2026-08-28 11:56:07 +00:00
* s3: enforce object lock when deleting a directory marker The key "dir/" is deleted the unversioned way, ahead of the branches that enforce Object Lock, so a principal with plain delete permission could remove a key the gateway was reporting as COMPLIANCE-retained -- retention set through PutObjectRetention is stored on the directory entry and served back by GetObjectRetention, only the delete ignored it. The same path also takes any key ending in "/" regardless of size, while a PUT only makes a marker of one up to 1KiB. A larger one is a genuine versioned object, and deleting it here dropped its whole history after the versioned delete of the same key had been refused. Enforce in the marker delete itself, so the single, versioned and multi-object delete paths are all covered. * s3: apply object lock headers on a directory marker PUT The trailing-slash branch runs before the versioning and Object Lock handling, so it accepted x-amz-object-lock-* headers and stored none of them: a bucket owner could believe a key was retained while nothing recorded it, and an invalid mode or a past retention date that a regular key rejects came back 200 here. Validate the headers the way the regular path does, store what they ask for beside the owner the same callback already sets, and refuse to replace a key that is already retained. * s3: check every version a marker delete would remove The marker delete clears any history under the key in one recursive removal, while the lock check ahead of it resolves the latest version only. A version retained under an unretained one was taken with the rest, so enforce against each version the removal covers. * test: pin the marker lock refusals to AccessDenied A bare require.Error passes on any failure, including one that has nothing to do with the lock. Assert the code, the key the batch delete reports, and that the marker survives each refusal. * s3: check the history entries a version list leaves out The version list skips an entry without a version id, while the removal takes it with the rest, so an entry an older build left unnamed escaped the check. Walk the history directly instead, and refuse when an unnamed entry is still under a retention or a legal hold of its own. * s3: let a governance bypass reach an unnamed history entry The unnamed branch refused every active retention, so a caller allowed to bypass governance could not clear one, which the named path lets through. Refuse a legal hold and compliance mode as before, and take the bypass into account for governance. * s3: keep the object lock decision in one place The unnamed history entry had to repeat the retention and legal hold rules inline because the enforcement helper only takes a key to look up. Split the part that judges an entry out of it and call that from both. * s3: guard a marker PUT on the entry it replaces The overwrite check resolved the key's latest version, but mkdir builds a fresh entry for the marker itself, dropping the lock metadata the old one carried. Once the key had a history, an unlocked version answered for a retained marker and a plain PUT replaced it. Judge the entry the write is about to replace instead; a versioned write of the same key still adds a version, which is its own to allow. * s3: guard a marker delete on the entry it removes The check ran against the key rather than the entry, so once the key had a history it answered with a version and the retention recorded on the marker itself went unseen. Judge the entry that is about to be removed, the same way the PUT side now does; the versions under it are still covered by the walk that follows. * s3: take the object write lock for a marker PUT The overwrite check read the entry that the mkdir after it replaces, so two marker PUTs could both pass while one was still unlocked. The marker delete already runs under this lock; hold it across the check and the mkdir so the entry cannot change in between, and so the two paths are serialized against each other.