mirror of
https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs.git
synced 2026-06-09 18:32:43 +00:00
378f9a64ff
* fix(shell): correct volume.list -writable filter unit and comparison * fix(shell): correct volume.list -writable filter unit and comparison * chore(shell): fix typo in EC shard helper param names * fix(shell): use exact match for volume.balance -racks/-nodes filter The old strings.Contains-based filter quietly included any id that was a substring of the user-supplied flag value (e.g. -racks=rack10 also matched rack1). Replace it with an exact-match set parsed from the comma-separated flag value, and add regression tests for both -racks and -nodes paths. Also fix a small typo in the "remote storage" error returned by maybeMoveOneVolume. * fix(shell): use exact match for volume.balance -racks/-nodes filter The old strings.Contains-based filter quietly included any id that was a substring of the user-supplied flag value (e.g. -racks=rack10 also matched rack1). Replace it with an exact-match set parsed from the comma-separated flag value, and add regression tests for both -racks and -nodes paths. Also fix a small typo in the "remote storage" error returned by maybeMoveOneVolume. * refactor(shell): drop nil sentinel in splitCSVSet, use len() in callers * fix: apply collectionPattern during detection in volume.fix.replication * use existing wildcard.MatchesWildcard for collection matching It returns a plain bool, so drop the up-front filepath.Match validation and the path/filepath import that only existed to handle its error. * trim verbose comments to terse one-liners * drop redundant per-path collection guards Detection already filters by replicas[0].info.Collection. The repair guard re-checked pickOneReplicaToCopyFrom's collection (a different replica), so a mixed-collection volume could pass detection yet be skipped in repair without decrementing the counter, spinning the -apply loop. deleteOneVolume keeps its collectionIsMismatch safety. --------- Co-authored-by: Chris Lu <chris.lu@gmail.com>