fix order of BlockID and Timestamp in Vote and Proposal (#3078)

* Consistent order fields of Timestamp/BlockID fields in CanonicalVote and
CanonicalProposal

* update spec too

* Introduce and use IsZero & IsComplete:
 - update IsZero method according to spec and introduce IsComplete
 - use methods in validate basic to validate: proposals come with a
 "complete" blockId and votes are either complete or empty
 - update spec: BlockID.IsNil() -> BlockID.IsZero() and fix typo

* BlockID comes first

* fix tests
This commit is contained in:
Ismail Khoffi
2019-01-13 23:56:36 +01:00
committed by Ethan Buchman
parent 1ccc0918f5
commit 1f68318875
10 changed files with 40 additions and 25 deletions

View File

@@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ type Vote struct {
Type SignedMsgType `json:"type"`
Height int64 `json:"height"`
Round int `json:"round"`
Timestamp time.Time `json:"timestamp"`
BlockID BlockID `json:"block_id"` // zero if vote is nil.
Timestamp time.Time `json:"timestamp"`
ValidatorAddress Address `json:"validator_address"`
ValidatorIndex int `json:"validator_index"`
Signature []byte `json:"signature"`
@@ -127,6 +127,11 @@ func (vote *Vote) ValidateBasic() error {
if err := vote.BlockID.ValidateBasic(); err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("Wrong BlockID: %v", err)
}
// BlockID.ValidateBasic would not err if we for instance have an empty hash but a
// non-empty PartsSetHeader:
if !vote.BlockID.IsZero() && !vote.BlockID.IsComplete() {
return fmt.Errorf("BlockID must be either empty or complete, got: %v", vote.BlockID)
}
if len(vote.ValidatorAddress) != crypto.AddressSize {
return fmt.Errorf("Expected ValidatorAddress size to be %d bytes, got %d bytes",
crypto.AddressSize,