From 24e83a52c36452698021da3e571cee2781c0e554 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: William Banfield Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 11:41:44 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] would -> could --- docs/rfc/rfc-018-bls-agg-exploration.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/rfc/rfc-018-bls-agg-exploration.md b/docs/rfc/rfc-018-bls-agg-exploration.md index 940a2b36f..6f635c938 100644 --- a/docs/rfc/rfc-018-bls-agg-exploration.md +++ b/docs/rfc/rfc-018-bls-agg-exploration.md @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ data in the header. Adding BLS signatures would create a new signature type that must be understood by the IBC module and by the relayers. For some operations, such as state updates, the set of data written into the chain and received by the -IBC module would be slightly smaller. +IBC module could be slightly smaller. ## Discussion