From 477be5b2eaeb60f43d7989ed70bbe9a1b1a334c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jasmina Malicevic Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 13:42:13 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] spelling Co-authored-by: Lasaro Camargos --- docs/rfc/rfc-026-p2p-bad-peers-checktx.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/rfc/rfc-026-p2p-bad-peers-checktx.md b/docs/rfc/rfc-026-p2p-bad-peers-checktx.md index 44973ad95..610ec8895 100644 --- a/docs/rfc/rfc-026-p2p-bad-peers-checktx.md +++ b/docs/rfc/rfc-026-p2p-bad-peers-checktx.md @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ who gossip such transactions. Additionally, users expressed a need for banning p repeatedly send transactions failing `CheckTx`. The main goal of this document is to analyse the cases where peers could be banned when they send -transacations failing `CheckTx`, and provide the exact conditions that a peer and transaction have +transactions failing `CheckTx`, and provide the exact conditions that a peer and transaction have to satisfy in order to mark the peer as bad. This document will also include a proposal for implementing these changes within the mempool, including