From 98d5945d1c543ac6d4b9b97688c172082a73ce1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: William Banfield <4561443+williambanfield@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 13:31:48 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Update docs/rfc/rfc-020-block-structure-consolidation.md Co-authored-by: Callum Waters --- docs/rfc/rfc-020-block-structure-consolidation.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/rfc/rfc-020-block-structure-consolidation.md b/docs/rfc/rfc-020-block-structure-consolidation.md index 17b2d3329..b17d42e0d 100644 --- a/docs/rfc/rfc-020-block-structure-consolidation.md +++ b/docs/rfc/rfc-020-block-structure-consolidation.md @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ apart into a few different lines of inquiry. 1. What values need to be included as part of the Merkle tree so that the consensus algorithm can use proof-of-stake consensus to validate all of the properties of the chain that we would like? -1. How can we create views of the data that can be easily retrieved, stored, and +2. How can we create views of the data that can be easily retrieved, stored, and verified by the relevant protocols? These two concerns are intertwined at the moment as a result of how we store