closes: #8039
This pull request updates the new ABCI++ protos to use `enum`s in place of `bool`s. `enums` may be preferred over `bool` because an `enum` can be udpated to include new statuses in the future, whereas a `bool` cannot and is fixed as just `true` or `false` over the whole lifecycle of the API.
This change implements the logic for the PrepareProposal ABCI++ method call. The main logic for creating and issuing the PrepareProposal request lives in execution.go and is tested in a set of new tests in execution_test.go. This change also updates the mempool mock to use a mockery generated version and removes much of the plumbing for the no longer used ABCIResponses.
This change set implements the most recent version of `FinalizeBlock`.
# What does this change actually contain?
* This change set is rather large but fear not! The majority of the files touched and changes are renaming `ResponseDeliverTx` to `ExecTxResult`. This should be a pretty inoffensive change since they're effectively the same type but with a different name.
* The `execBlockOnProxyApp` was totally removed since it served as just a wrapper around the logic that is now mostly encapsulated within `FinalizeBlock`
* The `updateState` helper function has been made a public method on `State`. It was being exposed as a shim through the testing infrastructure, so this seemed innocuous.
* Tests already existed to ensure that the application received the `ByzantineValidators` and the `ValidatorUpdates`, but one was fixed up to ensure that `LastCommitInfo` was being sent across.
* Tests were removed from the `psql` indexer that seemed to search for an event in the indexer that was not being created.
# Questions for reviewers
* We store this [ABCIResponses](5721a13ab1/proto/tendermint/state/types.pb.go (L37)) type in the data base as the block results. This type has changed since v0.35 to contain the `FinalizeBlock` response. I'm wondering if we need to do any shimming to keep the old data retrieveable?
* Similarly, this change is exposed via the RPC through [ResultBlockResults](5721a13ab1/rpc/coretypes/responses.go (L69)) changing. Should we somehow shim or notify for this change?
closes: #7658
This change implements the spec for `ProcessProposal`. It first calls the Tendermint block validation logic to check that all of the proposed block fields are well formed and do not violate any of the rules for Tendermint to consider the block valid and then passes the validated block the `ProcessProposal`.
This change also adds additional fixtures to test the change. It adds the `baseMock` types that holds a mock as well as a reference to `BaseApplication`. If the function was not setup by the test on the contained mock Application, the type delegates to the `BaseApplication` and returns what `BaseApplication` returns.
The change also switches the `makeState` helper to take an arg struct so that an ABCI application can be plumbed through when needed.
closes: #7656
This is the first step in removing the mutex from ABCI applications:
making our test applications hold mutexes, which this does, hopefully
with zero impact. If this lands well, then we can explore deleting the
other mutexes (in the ABCI server and the clients.) While this change
is not user impacting at all, removing the other mutexes *will* be.
In persuit of this, I've changed the KV app somewhat, to put almost
all of the logic in the base application and make the persistent
application mostly be a wrapper on top of that with a different
storage layer.
* Rebased and git-squashed the commits in PR #6546
migrate abci to finalizeBlock
work on abci, proxy and mempool
abciresponse, blok events, indexer, some tests
fix some tests
fix errors
fix errors in abci
fix tests amd errors
* Fixes after rebasing PR#6546
* Restored height to RequestFinalizeBlock & other
* Fixed more UTs
* Fixed kvstore
* More UT fixes
* last TC fixed
* make format
* Update internal/consensus/mempool_test.go
Co-authored-by: William Banfield <4561443+williambanfield@users.noreply.github.com>
* Addressed @williambanfield's comments
* Fixed UTs
* Addressed last comments from @williambanfield
* make format
Co-authored-by: marbar3778 <marbar3778@yahoo.com>
Co-authored-by: William Banfield <4561443+williambanfield@users.noreply.github.com>
This PR tackles the case of using the e2e application in a long lived testnet. The application continually saves snapshots (usually every 100 blocks) which after a while bloats the size of the application. This PR prunes older snapshots so that only the most recent 10 snapshots remain.
I believe that this, in my testing seems to help the e2e state-sync
tests complete more reliably, by fixing some potential, range-related
slice building, as well as the way the test app hashes snapshots.
Additionally, and I'm not sure if we want to do this, but I added this
hook to the reactor that re-sends the request for snapshots during the
retry. This helps in tests prevent systems from getting stuck, but I
think in reality, it might create more traffic, and operators would
just restart a state-syncing node to get a similar effect.
Executed a local network using simapp and looked for logs that seemed superfluous. This isn't by any means an exhaustive grooming, but should drastically help legibility of logs.
ref: #5912
closes: #5770closes: #5769
also, include node ID in the output (#5769) and modify NodeKey to use
value semantics (it makes perfect sense for NodeKey to not be a
pointer).
## Description
Hardcode ed25519 to dialTCPFn in e2e tests.
I will backport `DefaultRequestHandler` fixes
This will be replaced when grpc is implemented.
Closes#5291. Adds a randomized testnet generator. Nightly CI job will be submitted separately. A few of the testnets can be a bit flaky, even after disabling known-faulty behavior and making minor tweaks, and the larger networks may be too resource-intensive to run in CI - this will be optimized separately.
