* p2p: migrate to use new interface for channel errors
* Update internal/p2p/p2ptest/require.go
Co-authored-by: M. J. Fromberger <michael.j.fromberger@gmail.com>
* rename
* feedback
Co-authored-by: M. J. Fromberger <michael.j.fromberger@gmail.com>
This continues the push of plumbing contexts through tendermint. I
attempted to find all goroutines in the production code (non-test) and
made sure that these threads would exit when their contexts were
canceled, and I believe this PR does that.
This is a very small change, but removes a method from the
`service.Service` interface (a win!) and forces callers to explicitly
pass loggers in to objects during construction rather than (later)
injecting them. There's not a real need for this kind of lazy
construction of loggers, and I think a decent potential for confusion
for mutable loggers.
The main concern I have is that this changes the constructor API for
ABCI clients. I think this is fine, and I suspect that as we plumb
contexts through, and make changes to the RPC services there'll be a
number of similar sorts of changes to various (quasi) public
interfaces, which I think we should welcome.
When dialing fails to succeed we should reduce the score of the peer,
which puts the peer at (potentially) greater chances of being removed
from the peer manager, and reduces the chance of the peer being
gossiped by the PEX reactor.
The main (and minor) win of this PR is that the transport is fully the
responsibility of the router and the node doesn't need to be responsible for its lifecylce.
I saw one of these tests fail and it looks like it was using code that
wasn't being called anywhere, so I deleted it, and avoided the package
name aliasing.
This pull request adds a new "mesage_type" label to the send/recv bytes metrics calculated in the p2p code.
Below is a snippet of the updated metrics that includes the updated label:
```
tendermint_p2p_peer_receive_bytes_total{chID="32",chain_id="ci",message_type="consensus_HasVote",peer_id="2551a13ed720101b271a5df4816d1e4b3d3bd133"} 652
tendermint_p2p_peer_receive_bytes_total{chID="32",chain_id="ci",message_type="consensus_HasVote",peer_id="4b1068420ef739db63377250553562b9a978708a"} 631
tendermint_p2p_peer_receive_bytes_total{chID="32",chain_id="ci",message_type="consensus_HasVote",peer_id="927c50a5e508c747830ce3ba64a3f70fdda58ef2"} 631
tendermint_p2p_peer_receive_bytes_total{chID="32",chain_id="ci",message_type="consensus_NewRoundStep",peer_id="2551a13ed720101b271a5df4816d1e4b3d3bd133"} 393
tendermint_p2p_peer_receive_bytes_total{chID="32",chain_id="ci",message_type="consensus_NewRoundStep",peer_id="4b1068420ef739db63377250553562b9a978708a"} 357
tendermint_p2p_peer_receive_bytes_total{chID="32",chain_id="ci",message_type="consensus_NewRoundStep",peer_id="927c50a5e508c747830ce3ba64a3f70fdda58ef2"} 386
```
This is, perhaps, the trival final piece of #7075 that I've been
working on.
There's more work to be done:
- push more of the setup into the pacakges themselves
- move channel-based sending/filtering out of the
- simplify the buffering throuhgout the p2p stack.
This metric describes itself as 'pending' but never actual decrements when the messages are removed from the queue.
This change fixes that by decrementing the metric when the data is removed from the queue.
This code hasn't been battle tested, and seems to have grown
increasingly flaky int tests. Given our general direction of reducing
queue complexity over the next couple of releases I think it makes
sense to remove it.
A few notes:
- this is not all the deletion that we can do, but this is the most
"simple" case: it leaves in shims, and there's some trivial
additional cleanup to the transport that can happen but that
requires writing more code, and I wanted this to be easy to review
above all else.
- This should land *after* we cut the branch for 0.35, but I'm
anticipating that to happen soon, and I wanted to run this through
CI.
The code in the Tendermint repository makes heavy use of import aliasing.
This is made necessary by our extensive reuse of common base package names, and
by repetition of similar names across different subdirectories.
Unfortunately we have not been very consistent about which packages we alias in
various circumstances, and the aliases we use vary. In the spirit of the advice
in the style guide and https://github.com/golang/go/wiki/CodeReviewComments#imports,
his change makes an effort to clean up and normalize import aliasing.
This change makes no API or behavioral changes. It is a pure cleanup intended
o help make the code more readable to developers (including myself) trying to
understand what is being imported where.
Only unexported names have been modified, and the changes were generated and
applied mechanically with gofmt -r and comby, respecting the lexical and
syntactic rules of Go. Even so, I did not fix every inconsistency. Where the
changes would be too disruptive, I left it alone.
The principles I followed in this cleanup are:
- Remove aliases that restate the package name.
- Remove aliases where the base package name is unambiguous.
- Move overly-terse abbreviations from the import to the usage site.
- Fix lexical issues (remove underscores, remove capitalization).
- Fix import groupings to more closely match the style guide.
- Group blank (side-effecting) imports and ensure they are commented.
- Add aliases to multiple imports with the same base package name.
* add information on upgrading to the new p2p library
* clarify p2p backwards compatibility
* reorder p2p queue list
* add demo for p2p selection
* fix spacing in upgrading
This change aims to keep versions of mockery consistent across developer laptops.
This change adds mockery to the `tools.go` file so that its version can be managed consistently in the `go.mod` file.
Additionally, this change temporarily disables adding mockery's version number to generated files. There is an outstanding issue against the mockery project related to the version string behavior when running from `go get`. I have created a pull request to fix this issue in the mockery project.
see: https://github.com/vektra/mockery/issues/397
Update those break statements inside case clauses that are intended to reach an
enclosing for loop, so that they correctly exit the loop.
The candidate files for this change were located using:
% staticcheck -checks SA4011 ./... | cut -d: -f-2
This change is intended to preserve the intended semantics of the code, but
since the code as-written did not have its intended effect, some behaviour may
change. Specifically: Some loops may have run longer than they were supposed
to, prior to this change.
In one case I was not able to clearly determine the intended outcome. That case
has been commented but otherwise left as-written.
Fixes#6780.
Sam Kleinman
M. J. Fromberger
Sharad Chand
William Banfield
Callum Waters
lklimek