When testing rollback feature in the Cosmos SDK, we found that the app hash
in Tendermint after rollback was the value after the latest block, rather than
before it.
Co-authored-by: Callum Waters <cmwaters19@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 8a238fdcb4)
Co-authored-by: yihuang <huang@crypto.com>
* build: Make sure to test packages with external tests (#7608)
The test filter was looking for "TestGoFiles", which does not include tests in
a separate package (e.g., "package foo_test" for "package foo").
This caused several packages not to be tested in CI, including:
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/abci/client
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/crypto
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/crypto/tmhash
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/eventbus
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/evidence
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/inspect
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/jsontypes
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/libs/protoio
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/libs/sync
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/p2p/pex
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/pubsub
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/pubsub/query
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/pubsub/query/syntax
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/state/indexer
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/state/indexer/block/kv
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/json
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/log
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/os
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/light
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/light/provider/http
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/privval/grpc
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/proto/tendermint/blocksync
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/proto/tendermint/consensus
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/proto/tendermint/statesync
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/rpc/client
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/rpc/client/mock
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/test/e2e/tests
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/test/fuzz/mempool
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/test/fuzz/p2p/secretconnection
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/test/fuzz/rpc/jsonrpc/server
Updates #7626 and #7634.
(cherry picked from commit aea428d322)
* Fix build tags to satisfy Go 1.16.
Co-authored-by: M. J. Fromberger <fromberger@interchain.io>
* consensus: calculate prevote message delay metric (#7551)
## What does this pull request do?
This pull requests adds two metrics intended for use in calculating an experimental value for `MessageDelay`.
The metrics are as follows:
```
# HELP tendermint_consensus_complete_prevote_message_delay Difference in seconds between the proposal timestamp and the timestamp of the prevote that achieved 100% of the voting power in the prevote step.
# TYPE tendermint_consensus_complete_prevote_message_delay gauge
tendermint_consensus_complete_prevote_message_delay{chain_id="test-chain-aZbwF1"} 0.013025505
# HELP tendermint_consensus_quorum_prevote_message_delay Difference in seconds between the proposal timestamp and the timestamp of the prevote that achieved a quorum in the prevote step.
# TYPE tendermint_consensus_quorum_prevote_message_delay gauge
tendermint_consensus_quorum_prevote_message_delay{chain_id="test-chain-aZbwF1"} 0.013025505
```
## Why this change?
For more information on what these metrics are calculating, see #7202. The aim is to merge to backport these metrics to v0.34 and run nodes on a few popular chains with these metrics to determine the experimental values for `MessageDelay` on these popular chains and use these to select our default `SynchronyParams.MessageDelay` value.
## Why Gauges for the metrics?
Gauges allow us to overwrite the metric on each successive observation. We can then capture these metrics over time to track the highest and lowest observed value.
(cherry picked from commit 0c82ceaa5f)
# Conflicts:
# internal/consensus/state.go
* fix merge conflicts
Co-authored-by: William Banfield <4561443+williambanfield@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: William Banfield <wbanfield@gmail.com>
* build(deps): Bump github.com/adlio/schema from 1.1.15 to 1.2.2
Bumps [github.com/adlio/schema](https://github.com/adlio/schema) from 1.1.15 to 1.2.2.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/adlio/schema/releases)
- [Commits](https://github.com/adlio/schema/compare/v1.1.15...v1.2.2)
---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: github.com/adlio/schema
dependency-type: direct:production
update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
* Work around API changes in the migrator package.
A recent update inadvertently broke the API by changing the receiver types of
the methods without updating the constructor.
See: https://github.com/adlio/schema/issues/13
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: M. J. Fromberger <fromberger@interchain.io>
Noticed in profiles that invoking *VoteSignBytes always created a
bytes.Buffer, then discarded it inside protoio.MarshalDelimited.
I dug further and examined the call paths and noticed that we
unconditionally create the bytes.Buffer, even though we might
have proto messages (in the common case) that implement
MarshalTo([]byte), and invoked varintWriter. Instead by inlining
this case, we skip a bunch of allocations and CPU cycles,
which then reflects properly on all calling functions. Here
are the benchmark results:
```shell
$ benchstat before.txt after.txt
name old time/op new time/op delta
types.VoteSignBytes-8 705ns ± 3% 573ns ± 6% -18.74% (p=0.000 n=18+20)
types.CommitVoteSignBytes-8 8.15µs ± 9% 6.81µs ± 4% -16.51% (p=0.000 n=20+19)
protoio.MarshalDelimitedWithMarshalTo-8 788ns ± 8% 772ns ± 3% -2.01% (p=0.050 n=20+20)
protoio.MarshalDelimitedNoMarshalTo-8 989ns ± 4% 845ns ± 2% -14.51% (p=0.000 n=20+18)
name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta
types.VoteSignBytes-8 792B ± 0% 600B ± 0% -24.24% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
types.CommitVoteSignBytes-8 9.52kB ± 0% 7.60kB ± 0% -20.17% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
protoio.MarshalDelimitedNoMarshalTo-8 808B ± 0% 440B ± 0% -45.54% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta
types.VoteSignBytes-8 13.0 ± 0% 10.0 ± 0% -23.08% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
types.CommitVoteSignBytes-8 140 ± 0% 110 ± 0% -21.43% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
protoio.MarshalDelimitedNoMarshalTo-8 10.0 ± 0% 7.0 ± 0% -30.00% (p=0.000 n=20+20)
```
Thanks to Tharsis who tasked me to help them increase TPS and who
are keen on improving Tendermint and efficiency.
(cherry picked from commit 3e92899bd9)
Co-authored-by: Emmanuel T Odeke <emmanuel@orijtech.com>
Some of our tests were creating a psql event sink and expecting
it to report (or not report) certain kinds of errors. These tests
were ill-founded in a couple of ways:
1. Tests that required the Postgres driver were not loading it.
This led to spurious successes on tests that wanted "some error"
from the sink constructor, but didn't exercise the right path.
2. Tests that wanted a Postgres sink to succeed without a database.
These tests "passed" because they weren't actually establishing a
connection to the database, but if they had would have failed for
the lack of one.
To fix this:
- Load the postgres driver in tests that need it.
- Verify connectivity before reporting successful creation of a PSQL event sink.
- Remove tests that wanted a psql sink without a database, since that case
is already tested elsewhere.
(cherry picked from commit ab1788b922)
* internal/proxy: add initial set of abci metrics (#7115)
This PR adds an initial set of metrics for use ABCI. The initial metrics enable the calculation of timing histograms and call counts for each of the ABCI methods. The metrics are also labeled as either 'sync' or 'async' to determine if the method call was performed using ABCI's `*Async` methods.
An example of these metrics is included here for reference:
```
tendermint_abci_connection_method_timing_bucket{chain_id="ci",method="commit",type="sync",le="0.0001"} 0
tendermint_abci_connection_method_timing_bucket{chain_id="ci",method="commit",type="sync",le="0.0004"} 5
tendermint_abci_connection_method_timing_bucket{chain_id="ci",method="commit",type="sync",le="0.002"} 12
tendermint_abci_connection_method_timing_bucket{chain_id="ci",method="commit",type="sync",le="0.009"} 13
tendermint_abci_connection_method_timing_bucket{chain_id="ci",method="commit",type="sync",le="0.02"} 13
tendermint_abci_connection_method_timing_bucket{chain_id="ci",method="commit",type="sync",le="0.1"} 13
tendermint_abci_connection_method_timing_bucket{chain_id="ci",method="commit",type="sync",le="0.65"} 13
tendermint_abci_connection_method_timing_bucket{chain_id="ci",method="commit",type="sync",le="2"} 13
tendermint_abci_connection_method_timing_bucket{chain_id="ci",method="commit",type="sync",le="6"} 13
tendermint_abci_connection_method_timing_bucket{chain_id="ci",method="commit",type="sync",le="25"} 13
tendermint_abci_connection_method_timing_bucket{chain_id="ci",method="commit",type="sync",le="+Inf"} 13
tendermint_abci_connection_method_timing_sum{chain_id="ci",method="commit",type="sync"} 0.007802058000000001
tendermint_abci_connection_method_timing_count{chain_id="ci",method="commit",type="sync"} 13
```
These metrics can easily be graphed using prometheus's `histogram_quantile(...)` method to pick out a particular quantile to graph or examine. I chose buckets that were somewhat of an estimate of expected range of times for ABCI operations. They start at .0001 seconds and range to 25 seconds. The hope is that this range captures enough possible times to be useful for us and operators.
* lint++
* docs: add abci timing metrics to the metrics docs (#7311)
* cherry-pick fixup
* p2p: reduce peer score for dial failures (#7265)
When dialing fails to succeed we should reduce the score of the peer,
which puts the peer at (potentially) greater chances of being removed
from the peer manager, and reduces the chance of the peer being
gossiped by the PEX reactor.
(cherry picked from commit 27560cf7a4)
Co-authored-by: Sam Kleinman <garen@tychoish.com>
The evidence test produces a set of mock evidence in the evidence pool of the 'Primary' node. The test then fills the evidence pools of secondaries with half of this mock evidence. Finally, the test waits until the secondary has an evidence pool as full as the primary.
The assertions that are removed here were checking that the primary and secondaries' evidence channels were empty. However, nothing in the test actually ensures that the channels are empty. The test only waits for the secondaries to have received the complete set of evidence, and the secondaries already received half of the evidence at the beginning. It's more than possible that the secondaries can receive the complete set of evidence and not finish reading the duplicate evidence off the channels.
(cherry picked from commit 4acd117b5e)
Co-authored-by: William Banfield <4561443+williambanfield@users.noreply.github.com>
As a safety measure, don't allow a query string to be unreasonably
long. The query filter is not especially efficient, so a query that
needs more than basic detail should filter coarsely in the subscriber
and refine on the client side.
This affects Subscribe and TxSearch queries.
(cherry picked from commit 9dc3d7f9a2)
* p2p: add message type into the send/recv bytes metrics (#7155)
This pull request adds a new "mesage_type" label to the send/recv bytes metrics calculated in the p2p code.
Below is a snippet of the updated metrics that includes the updated label:
```
tendermint_p2p_peer_receive_bytes_total{chID="32",chain_id="ci",message_type="consensus_HasVote",peer_id="2551a13ed720101b271a5df4816d1e4b3d3bd133"} 652
tendermint_p2p_peer_receive_bytes_total{chID="32",chain_id="ci",message_type="consensus_HasVote",peer_id="4b1068420ef739db63377250553562b9a978708a"} 631
tendermint_p2p_peer_receive_bytes_total{chID="32",chain_id="ci",message_type="consensus_HasVote",peer_id="927c50a5e508c747830ce3ba64a3f70fdda58ef2"} 631
tendermint_p2p_peer_receive_bytes_total{chID="32",chain_id="ci",message_type="consensus_NewRoundStep",peer_id="2551a13ed720101b271a5df4816d1e4b3d3bd133"} 393
tendermint_p2p_peer_receive_bytes_total{chID="32",chain_id="ci",message_type="consensus_NewRoundStep",peer_id="4b1068420ef739db63377250553562b9a978708a"} 357
tendermint_p2p_peer_receive_bytes_total{chID="32",chain_id="ci",message_type="consensus_NewRoundStep",peer_id="927c50a5e508c747830ce3ba64a3f70fdda58ef2"} 386
```
(cherry picked from commit b4bc6bb4e8)
This pull request fixes a panic that exists in both mempools. The panic occurs when the ABCI client misses a response from the ABCI application. This happen when the ABCI client drops the request as a result of a full client queue. The fix here was to loop through the ordered list of recheck-tx in the callback until one matches the currently observed recheck request.
(cherry picked from commit b0130c88fb)
Co-authored-by: William Banfield <4561443+williambanfield@users.noreply.github.com>
Addresses one of the concerns with #7041.
Provides a mechanism (via the RPC interface) to delete a single transaction, described by its hash, from the mempool. The method returns an error if the transaction cannot be found. Once the transaction is removed it remains in the cache and cannot be resubmitted until the cache is cleared or it expires from the cache.
(cherry picked from commit 851d2e3bde)
Co-authored-by: Sam Kleinman <garen@tychoish.com>
The race occurred as a result of a goroutine launched by `processPeerUpdate` racing with the `OnStop` method. The `processPeerUpdates` goroutine deletes from the map as `OnStop` is reading from it. This change updates the `OnStop` method to wait for the peer updates channel to be done before closing the peers. It also copies the map contents to a new map so that it will not conflict with the view of the map that the goroutine created in `processPeerUpdate` sees.
This is intended to fix a test failure that occurs in the p2p state provider. The issue presents as the state provider timing out waiting for the consensus params response.
The reason that this can occur is because the statesync reactor has the possibility of attempting to respond to the params request before the state provider is ready to read it. This results in the reactor hitting the `default` case seen here and then never sending on the channel. The stateprovider will then block waiting for a response and never receive one because the reactor opted not to send it.
When statesync is stopped during shutdown, it has the possibility of deadlocking. A dump of goroutines reveals that this is related to the peerUpdates channel not returning anything on its `Done()` channel when `OnStop` is called. As this is occuring, `processPeerUpdate` is attempting to acquire the reactor lock. It appears that this lock can never be acquired. I looked for the places where the lock may remain locked accidentally and cleaned them up in hopes to eradicate the issue. Dumps of the relevant goroutines may be found below. Note that the line numbers below are relative to the code in the `v0.35.0-rc1` tag.
```
goroutine 36 [chan receive]:
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/statesync.(*Reactor).OnStop(0xc00058f200)
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/statesync/reactor.go:243 +0x117
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/service.(*BaseService).Stop(0xc00058f200, 0x0, 0x0)
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/service/service.go:171 +0x323
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/node.(*nodeImpl).OnStop(0xc0001ea240)
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/node/node.go:769 +0x132
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/service.(*BaseService).Stop(0xc0001ea240, 0x0, 0x0)
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/service/service.go:171 +0x323
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/cmd/tendermint/commands.NewRunNodeCmd.func1.1()
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/cmd/tendermint/commands/run_node.go:143 +0x62
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/os.TrapSignal.func1(0xc000629500, 0x7fdb52f96358, 0xc0002b5030, 0xc00000daa0)
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/os/os.go:26 +0x102
created by github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/os.TrapSignal
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/os/os.go:22 +0xe6
goroutine 188 [semacquire]:
sync.runtime_SemacquireMutex(0xc00026b1cc, 0x0, 0x1)
runtime/sema.go:71 +0x47
sync.(*Mutex).lockSlow(0xc00026b1c8)
sync/mutex.go:138 +0x105
sync.(*Mutex).Lock(...)
sync/mutex.go:81
sync.(*RWMutex).Lock(0xc00026b1c8)
sync/rwmutex.go:111 +0x90
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/statesync.(*Reactor).processPeerUpdate(0xc00026b080, 0xc000650008, 0x28, 0x124de90, 0x4)
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/statesync/reactor.go:849 +0x1a5
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/statesync.(*Reactor).processPeerUpdates(0xc00026b080)
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/statesync/reactor.go:883 +0xab
created by github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/statesync.(*Reactor.OnStart
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/statesync/reactor.go:219 +0xcd)
```
When shutting down blocksync, it is observed that the process can hang completely. A dump of running goroutines reveals that this is due to goroutines not listening on the correct shutdown signal. Namely, the `poolRoutine` goroutine does not wait on `pool.Quit`. The `poolRoutine` does not receive any other shutdown signal during `OnStop` becuase it must stop before the `r.closeCh` is closed. Currently the `poolRoutine` listens in the `closeCh` which will not close until the `poolRoutine` stops and calls `poolWG.Done()`.
This change also puts the `requestRoutine()` in the `OnStart` method to make it more visible since it does not rely on anything that is spawned in the `poolRoutine`.
```
goroutine 183 [semacquire]:
sync.runtime_Semacquire(0xc0000d3bd8)
runtime/sema.go:56 +0x45
sync.(*WaitGroup).Wait(0xc0000d3bd0)
sync/waitgroup.go:130 +0x65
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/blocksync/v0.(*Reactor).OnStop(0xc0000d3a00)
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/blocksync/v0/reactor.go:193 +0x47
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/service.(*BaseService).Stop(0xc0000d3a00, 0x0, 0x0)
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/service/service.go:171 +0x323
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/node.(*nodeImpl).OnStop(0xc00052c000)
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/node/node.go:758 +0xc62
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/service.(*BaseService).Stop(0xc00052c000, 0x0, 0x0)
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/service/service.go:171 +0x323
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/cmd/tendermint/commands.NewRunNodeCmd.func1.1()
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/cmd/tendermint/commands/run_node.go:143 +0x62
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/os.TrapSignal.func1(0xc000df6d20, 0x7f04a68da900, 0xc0004a8930, 0xc0005a72d8)
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/os/os.go:26 +0x102
created by github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/os.TrapSignal
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/libs/os/os.go:22 +0xe6
goroutine 161 [select]:
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/blocksync/v0.(*Reactor).poolRoutine(0xc0000d3a00, 0x0)
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/blocksync/v0/reactor.go:464 +0x2b3
created by github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/blocksync/v0.(*Reactor).OnStart
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/blocksync/v0/reactor.go:174 +0xf1
goroutine 162 [select]:
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/blocksync/v0.(*Reactor).processBlockSyncCh(0xc0000d3a00)
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/blocksync/v0/reactor.go:310 +0x151
created by github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/blocksync/v0.(*Reactor).OnStart
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/blocksync/v0/reactor.go:177 +0x54
goroutine 163 [select]:
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/blocksync/v0.(*Reactor).processPeerUpdates(0xc0000d3a00)
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/blocksync/v0/reactor.go:363 +0x12b
created by github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/blocksync/v0.(*Reactor).OnStart
github.com/tendermint/tendermint/internal/blocksync/v0/reactor.go:178 +0x76
```
This test reliably gets hung up on network configuration, (which may
be a real issue,) but it's network setup is handcranked and we should
ensure that the test focuses on it's core assertions and doesn't fail for
test architecture reasons.
