Files
tendermint/docs/architecture
Thane Thomson 6a5023a4a0 Update ADR template
The reason for this proposed update to the ADR template is twofold:

1. There's currently no easy way to cross-reference between ADRs and
   issues/PRs on GitHub. This may be easy to manage for those with
   context while they're working on implementing an ADR, but after time
   passes and for complex ADRs it gets more difficult for newcomers to
   the codebase to track both the implementation status of the ADR or
   its historical context and discussions.
2. We should not allow for "proposed" ADRs. An ADR is a **decision
   record**, which implies acceptance, and not a proposal. RFCs provide
   a mechanism to make proposals.

Signed-off-by: Thane Thomson <connect@thanethomson.com>
2022-02-08 14:45:47 -05:00
..
2021-05-28 08:56:47 +00:00
2021-05-28 08:56:47 +00:00
2021-05-28 08:56:47 +00:00
2021-05-28 08:56:47 +00:00
2018-11-15 18:08:24 -05:00
2020-07-06 11:27:17 +00:00
2022-02-08 14:45:47 -05:00

order, parent
order parent
1
order
false

Architecture Decision Records (ADR)

This is a location to record all high-level architecture decisions in the tendermint project.

You can read more about the ADR concept in this blog post.

An ADR should provide:

  • Context on the relevant goals and the current state
  • Proposed changes to achieve the goals
  • Summary of pros and cons
  • References
  • Changelog

Note the distinction between an ADR and a spec. The ADR provides the context, intuition, reasoning, and justification for a change in architecture, or for the architecture of something new. The spec is much more compressed and streamlined summary of everything as it stands today.

If recorded decisions turned out to be lacking, convene a discussion, record the new decisions here, and then modify the code to match.

Note the context/background should be written in the present tense.

Table of Contents

Implemented

Accepted

Rejected

Proposed