Fixes#4201: Ensure PriorityClasses are restored before pods that
reference them, preventing restoration failures when pods depend on
custom PriorityClasses.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tiger Kaovilai <tkaovila@redhat.com>
It failed with fetching the wrong VolumeInfo. Correct it.
Add AdditionalBSL label for applied cases.
Remove not needed default BSL kibishii test for additional bsl case.
Signed-off-by: Xun Jiang <xun.jiang@broadcom.com>
PVB and PVR used to print related pod namespace in output.
In v1.17, the behavior changed. Use backup or restore name to filter them.
Shorten the timeout context from 1h to 5m, because AWS was not covered anymore.
Remove an used if branch for vSphere.
Signed-off-by: Xun Jiang <xun.jiang@broadcom.com>
- Add --server-priority-class-name and --node-agent-priority-class-name flags to velero install command
- Configure data mover pods (PVB/PVR/DataUpload/DataDownload) to use priority class from node-agent-configmap
- Configure maintenance jobs to use priority class from repo-maintenance-job-configmap (global config only)
- Add priority class validation with ValidatePriorityClass and GetDataMoverPriorityClassName utilities
- Update e2e tests to include PriorityClass testing utilities
- Move priority class design document to Implemented folder
- Add comprehensive unit tests for all priority class implementations
- Update documentation for priority class configuration
- Add changelog entry for #8883
Signed-off-by: Tiger Kaovilai <tkaovila@redhat.com>
remove unused test utils
Signed-off-by: Tiger Kaovilai <tkaovila@redhat.com>
feat: add unit test for getting priority class name in maintenance jobs
Signed-off-by: Tiger Kaovilai <tkaovila@redhat.com>
doc update
Signed-off-by: Tiger Kaovilai <tkaovila@redhat.com>
feat: add priority class validation for repository maintenance jobs
- Add ValidatePriorityClassWithClient function to validate priority class existence
- Integrate validation in maintenance.go when creating maintenance jobs
- Update tests to cover the new validation functionality
- Return boolean from ValidatePriorityClass to allow fallback behavior
This ensures maintenance jobs don't fail due to non-existent priority classes,
following the same pattern used for data mover pods.
Addresses feedback from:
https://github.com/vmware-tanzu/velero/pull/8883#discussion_r2238681442
Refs #8869
Signed-off-by: Tiger Kaovilai <tkaovila@redhat.com>
refactor: clean up priority class handling for data mover pods
- Fix comment in node_agent.go to clarify PriorityClassName is only for data mover pods
- Simplify server.go to use dataPathConfigs.PriorityClassName directly
- Remove redundant priority class logging from controllers as it's already logged during server startup
- Keep logging centralized in the node-agent server initialization
This reduces code duplication and clarifies the scope of priority class configuration.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Signed-off-by: Tiger Kaovilai <tkaovila@redhat.com>
refactor: remove GetDataMoverPriorityClassName from kube utilities
Remove GetDataMoverPriorityClassName function and its tests as priority
class is now read directly from dataPathConfigs instead of parsing from
ConfigMap. This simplifies the codebase by eliminating the need for
indirect ConfigMap parsing.
Refs #8869🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Signed-off-by: Tiger Kaovilai <tkaovila@redhat.com>
refactor: remove priority class validation from install command
Remove priority class validation during install as it's redundant
since validation already occurs during server startup. Users cannot
see console logs during install, making the validation warnings
ineffective at this stage.
The validation remains in place during server and node-agent startup
where it's more appropriate and visible to users.
Signed-off-by: Tiger Kaovilai <tkaovila@redhat.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
fixes#8610
This commit extends the resources policy, such that user can define
resource include exclude filters in the policy and reuse it in different backups.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Jiang <daniel.jiang@broadcom.com>
Addresses #9133 by adding clear documentation about the current limitation
where only the first element in the loadAffinity array is processed.
Changes:
- Added prominent warning at the beginning of loadAffinity section
- Updated misleading examples that showed multiple array elements
- Added warnings to each multi-element example explaining the limitation
- Clarified that the recommended approach is to combine all conditions
into a single loadAffinity element using both matchLabels and matchExpressions
This provides the "bare minimum" documentation clarification requested
in the issue until a code fix can be implemented.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Signed-off-by: Tiger Kaovilai <tkaovila@redhat.com>
Apply suggestion from @kaovilai
Signed-off-by: Tiger Kaovilai <passawit.kaovilai@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tiger Kaovilai <tkaovila@redhat.com>
Apply suggestion from @kaovilai
Signed-off-by: Tiger Kaovilai <passawit.kaovilai@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tiger Kaovilai <tkaovila@redhat.com>
Apply suggestion from @kaovilai
Signed-off-by: Tiger Kaovilai <passawit.kaovilai@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Tiger Kaovilai <tkaovila@redhat.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Tiger Kaovilai <tkaovila@redhat.com>
feat: Add CA cert fallback when caCertFile fails in download requests
- Fallback to BSL cert when caCertFile cannot be opened
- Combine certificate handling blocks to reuse CA pool initialization
- Add comprehensive unit tests for fallback behavior
This improves robustness by allowing downloads to proceed with BSL CA cert
when the provided CA cert file is unavailable or unreadable.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Signed-off-by: Tiger Kaovilai <tkaovila@redhat.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
If distributed snapshotting is enabled in the external snapshotter a manager label is added to the volume snapshot content. When exposing the snapshot velero needs to keep this label around otherwise the exposed snapshot will never become ready.
Signed-off-by: Felix Prasse <1330854+flx5@users.noreply.github.com>
