mirror of
https://tangled.org/evan.jarrett.net/at-container-registry
synced 2026-09-03 00:36:56 +00:00
last_seen means "this user did something recently". The backfill walks every historical record in the network, so stamping it there recorded when the backfill ran, not when the user was active — for every user at once, on every run. That destroys the only signal the column carries, and it is the one column in users that nothing upstream can rebuild. It is now written on the two paths that represent real activity: an interactive login, and a live commit event on the firehose, which does mean the user just wrote a record. The backfill still corrects handle, PDS endpoint and avatar, which is why it re-resolves rather than trusting a cache; it just no longer claims the user was present. UpsertUser grows an options form rather than a fourth named variant, since the avatar and last_seen decisions are independent and all four combinations occur. Anyone computing MAU from this column should know it was unreliable for every backfill run before this change. Also corrects docs/HORIZONTAL_SCALING.md, which claimed oci_client and registry_domain were local-only preferences. They are fields on io.atcr.sailor.profile: settings writes them to the user's PDS and ProcessSailorProfile refreshes the local cache. users is fully derived apart from last_seen. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
200 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
200 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
# Horizontally scaling the AppView
|
|
|
|
Status of the work to make the AppView safe to run as N instances, and what is
|
|
left before the database can move to local-write (Turso-style) embedded
|
|
replicas.
|
|
|
|
## The thing that decides everything else: most tables are derived
|
|
|
|
The AppView database is mostly a **cache of ATProto records**. Jetstream and the
|
|
backfill rebuild it from users' PDSes and from hold services. Losing a derived
|
|
table costs a re-crawl, not data.
|
|
|
|
A small set of tables is **authoritative**: nothing upstream can rebuild them,
|
|
so staleness or loss is real loss. Almost every remaining scaling concern lives
|
|
in that set, and the derived tables can mostly be ignored.
|
|
|
|
### Derived — rebuilt by jetstream/backfill
|
|
|
|
| Table | Source record |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| `manifests`, `layers`, `manifest_references` | `io.atcr.manifest` |
|
|
| `tags` | `io.atcr.tag` |
|
|
| `stars` | `io.atcr.sailor.star` |
|
|
| `repo_pages` | `io.atcr.repo.page` |
|
|
| `repository_annotations` | annotations on `io.atcr.manifest` |
|
|
| `repository_stats`, `repository_stats_daily` | `io.atcr.hold.stats` |
|
|
| `hold_captain_records` | `io.atcr.hold.captain` |
|
|
| `hold_crew_members` | `io.atcr.hold.crew` |
|
|
| `scans` | `io.atcr.hold.scan` |
|
|
| `users` (all but `last_seen`) | DID resolution, `app.bsky.actor.profile`, `io.atcr.sailor.profile` |
|
|
|
|
Stale reads here are self-correcting. A user who pushes an image and does not
|
|
see it for a few seconds is a cosmetic problem; the next backfill fixes any
|
|
divergence permanently.
|
|
|
|
### Authoritative — nothing upstream can rebuild these
|
|
|
|
| Table | Cost if lost or read stale |
|
|
|---|---|
|
|
| `crypto_keys` | Catastrophic. Every registry JWT and OAuth client assertion becomes unverifiable. |
|
|
| `oauth_sessions` | Every user must re-authenticate. Refresh tokens cannot be recovered. |
|
|
| `ui_sessions` | Users logged out. |
|
|
| `devices` | Every registered device must be re-enrolled; the secret is not recoverable. |
|
|
| `pending_device_auth` | In-flight device logins fail. |
|
|
| `webhooks` | User-created configuration, silently gone. |
|
|
| `stripe_processed_events` | Idempotency ledger. Losing it means reprocessing Stripe events. |
|
|
| `schema_migrations` | Migrations re-run against a database that already has them. |
|
|
| `advisor_suggestions` | Regenerable, at AI cost. |
|
|
| `users.last_seen` | The only non-derived column in an otherwise derived table. |
|
|
|
|
Self-healing, so effectively free to lose: `instance_leases`,
|
|
`hold_crew_approvals`, `hold_crew_denials`, `jetstream_cursor` (costs a
|
|
re-crawl), `labeler_cursor` + `taken_down_subjects` (replayable from the labeler
|
|
from cursor 0).
|
|
|
|
### `users` is fully derived, including preferences
|
|
|
|
`oci_client` and `registry_domain` look local but are not: both are fields on the
|
|
`io.atcr.sailor.profile` record. The settings form writes them to the user's PDS
|
|
and the local columns are a cache, refreshed by `ProcessSailorProfile`. Same for
|
|
`default_hold_did`. So the whole table can be rebuilt, preferences included.
|
|
|
|
`last_seen` is the exception, and it is not derived from anything — see below.
|
|
|
|
## What is done
|
|
|
|
Running N instances against one shared database is safe now.
|
|
|
|
- **`instance_leases` + `pkg/appview/leases`.** Exactly one instance runs the
|
|
Jetstream consumer, backfill, labeler subscriber, cleanup sweep and billing
|
|
tier refresh. The consumer in particular *must* be a singleton: `StatsCache` is
|
|
per-process in-memory state whose aggregate is written to `repository_stats` as
|
|
an absolute value, so two consumers overwrite each other with partial sums, and
|
|
every webhook fires twice.
|
|
- **OAuth session compare-and-swap.** Refresh tokens rotate on use, and the
|
|
per-DID mutex that serialized refreshes is in-process only. A second instance
|
|
refreshing the same account got `invalid_grant` and deleted the session out
|
|
from under the user. Writes now CAS on `oauth_sessions.rev`, and the delete
|
|
path checks whether the revision moved before destroying anything.
|
|
- **Atomic crew denial counter.** Was a read-modify-write; concurrent denials
|
|
lost increments and the backoff escalated slower than configured.
|
|
- **`crypto_keys` first-writer-wins.** Two instances booting against a fresh
|
|
database both generated a key and the loser kept its own in memory.
|
|
- **Denial cache no longer wiped on every boot.** `DELETE FROM
|
|
hold_crew_denials` ran unconditionally at startup, so a rolling deploy wiped
|
|
the shared table once per instance.
|
|
- **Node-independent keys.** `tags.id` dropped; `manifests.id` replaced by
|
|
`manifest_key`, derived from `(did, repository, digest)`. No rowid is allocated
|
|
by a node any more.
|
|
- **Schema drift is checked**, both as a test (`schema.sql` vs the migrations)
|
|
and as a warning at boot.
|
|
|
|
## What is left: read-after-write under local-write replicas
|
|
|
|
None of the following is a problem today. With write-forwarding replicas every
|
|
write goes to one primary, so all instances read a single consistent state.
|
|
They become problems only if the database moves to **local-write** replicas,
|
|
where each node writes locally and reconciles afterwards.
|
|
|
|
Given the derived/authoritative split, the list is short.
|
|
|
|
### 1. Session and device flows break visibly
|
|
|
|
These are authoritative and read immediately after write, by a *different*
|
|
instance than the one that wrote:
|
|
|
|
- **`ui_sessions`** — log in on instance A, the next request is routed to B, B
|
|
does not have the session yet, user appears logged out.
|
|
- **`pending_device_auth`** — A creates the pending row, the user approves on B,
|
|
the CLI polls C. If the poll interval is shorter than the sync interval the CLI
|
|
reports "still pending" after approval already happened, and may time out.
|
|
- **`devices`** — enrol on A, first push authenticates against B.
|
|
|
|
These need read-through-to-primary (or a forced sync) on the specific endpoints,
|
|
not a general consistency guarantee. The set of endpoints is small: the OAuth
|
|
callback, the device-code poll, and device authentication.
|
|
|
|
### 2. The OAuth CAS stops being a CAS
|
|
|
|
`oauth_sessions.rev` compare-and-swap assumes the `UPDATE ... WHERE rev = ?`
|
|
either wins or loses against one authoritative row. Under local writes both
|
|
nodes' updates succeed locally and conflict at reconciliation, where last-writer
|
|
wins by default — exactly the clobber the CAS exists to prevent.
|
|
|
|
This is the one place where local-write replication is genuinely incompatible
|
|
with the current design rather than merely inconvenient. Options: keep OAuth
|
|
sessions on a single-writer store, or move the per-DID lock to something with a
|
|
real serialization point.
|
|
|
|
### 3. `stripe_processed_events` needs a real barrier
|
|
|
|
The whole point of the table is that an event is processed exactly once. Two
|
|
nodes handling a redelivery concurrently would both find the row absent locally.
|
|
Billing is behind a build tag and low volume, so pinning webhook handling to one
|
|
instance (a lease) is likely simpler than making the ledger conflict-free.
|
|
|
|
### 4. Write amplification on the hot path
|
|
|
|
Not correctness, cost. Both are cheap to fix and worth doing before any remote
|
|
primary carries production traffic:
|
|
|
|
- `UpdateUserLastSeen` ran per Jetstream **event** for cached users. Now
|
|
throttled to once per five minutes per user.
|
|
- `DeviceStore.UpdateLastUsed` ran per `/auth/token` call, i.e. per docker
|
|
push/pull. Now throttled the same way.
|
|
|
|
### `last_seen` means "this user did something recently"
|
|
|
|
It is the one column in `users` that nothing upstream can rebuild, and it was
|
|
being written by the wrong things.
|
|
|
|
The backfill walks every historical record in the network. Stamping `last_seen`
|
|
there recorded *when the backfill ran*, for every user at once, on every run,
|
|
which destroys the only signal the column carries. It is now written on the two
|
|
paths that represent real activity: an interactive login, and a live commit event
|
|
observed on the firehose (which does mean the user just wrote a record).
|
|
|
|
Anyone computing MAU from this column should know it was unreliable for every
|
|
run before this change.
|
|
|
|
### 5. Not a problem, contrary to earlier suspicion
|
|
|
|
The second `?mode=ro` connection in `readonly.go` is fine in local-only mode:
|
|
verified that a write through the read-write handle is immediately visible to the
|
|
read-only one. Under embedded replicas it reads a file the replica connector is
|
|
syncing beneath it, which has not been verified against a real remote, but the
|
|
staleness that implies is already the documented expectation for that handle.
|
|
|
|
## The labeler's `labels.id` is not the same problem
|
|
|
|
`pkg/labeler` still uses `INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT`, and should.
|
|
|
|
That id is the **sequence number of the `com.atproto.label.subscribeLabels`
|
|
stream**. Consumers use it as a resumption cursor (`GetLabelsSince` is
|
|
`WHERE id > ? ORDER BY id ASC`), and `LatestSeq` is `MAX(id)`. Label negation
|
|
ordering also depends on it (`l2.id > l1.id` decides which label supersedes
|
|
which). A protocol stream sequence must be monotonic and totally ordered, which
|
|
by definition requires a single allocator. A derived key would have no ordering
|
|
at all, so the trick used for manifests does not transfer.
|
|
|
|
That is not a scaling defect, because a labeler **is** a single logical
|
|
publisher. The right shape is one writer with read replicas, not N writers. It
|
|
is also a separate service with its own database and its own `data_dir`, so none
|
|
of the AppView's storage decisions reach it.
|
|
|
|
The one thing worth knowing: `pkg/labeler/config.go` exposes `LibsqlSyncURL`, so
|
|
the labeler *can* be run as an embedded replica. If that ever became a
|
|
local-write replica with two instances creating labels, both would allocate the
|
|
same sequence number and consumers would silently miss labels — no error, just a
|
|
gap where a takedown should have been. If the labeler ever needs HA, it needs a
|
|
leader election like the AppView's, not a cleverer key.
|
|
|
|
## Recommended order
|
|
|
|
1. Throttle the two hot-path writes (§4). Useful now, independent of everything.
|
|
2. Decide the sync model. Under write-forwarding, nothing else here is required.
|
|
3. If moving to local-write: fix the session and device flows (§1), then resolve
|
|
OAuth sessions and the Stripe ledger (§2, §3), which may mean keeping those
|
|
tables on a single-writer store rather than making them conflict-free.
|