cql: atomic add/subtract operations with LWT

ScyllaDB has special counter columns for which atomic add/subtract
operations like `SET a = a + 1` are allowed. Such operations have not
been allowed on ordinary non-counter columns, as they would not be
properly atomic - the read an the write are separate, and concurrent
operations can have incorrect results.

This patch makes it allowed to use such atomic add/subtract operations
in *LWT* statements. Some examples:

        UPDATE ... SET a = a - 1 IF a > 0

        UPDATE ... SET a = a + 1 IF EXISTS

        UPDATE ... SET a = a + 1 a != NULL

The row updated in the operation, and the updated column (a) should
be initialized before the update - arithmetic operations on missing
column values silently leave the column null (no error is generated).

This add/subtract operations is allowed on any numeric column -
integer or floating point of any size.

The ability of LWT to fetch the old values of a column and use it to
calculate the new value has long been available in our internal CAS
implementation - and has been in use for years in Alternator - but until
this patch it was not exposed in CQL's LWT.

This patch does not add new syntax to CQL - the "SET a = a + b"
and "SET a = a - b" syntax that already existed for counters is now
allowed for non-counters.

This is a new Scylla-only feature that does not exist in Cassandra.

Fixes #10568

Signed-off-by: Nadav Har'El <nyh@scylladb.com>
This commit is contained in:
Nadav Har'El
2026-05-20 14:37:01 +03:00
parent 3c6931c1ed
commit f8aaeb5e87
9 changed files with 384 additions and 13 deletions

View File

@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include "types/list.hh"
#include "types/set.hh"
#include "types/user.hh"
#include "types/types.hh"
#include "service/broadcast_tables/experimental/lang.hh"
namespace cql3 {
@@ -151,10 +152,19 @@ operation::addition::prepare(data_dictionary::database db, const sstring& keyspa
auto ctype = dynamic_pointer_cast<const collection_type_impl>(receiver.type);
if (!ctype) {
if (!receiver.is_counter()) {
throw exceptions::invalid_request_exception(format("Invalid operation ({}) for non counter column {}", to_string(receiver), receiver.name_as_text()));
if (receiver.is_counter()) {
return make_shared<constants::adder>(receiver, std::move(v));
}
return make_shared<constants::adder>(receiver, std::move(v));
// Allow arithmetic on numeric non-counter columns in LWT updates
// (issue #10568). Build an expression that constants:setter will use.
if (receiver.type->is_arithmetic()) {
expr::expression arith_expr = expr::binary_operator(
expr::column_value{&receiver},
expr::oper_t::ADD,
v);
return make_shared<constants::setter>(receiver, std::move(arith_expr));
}
throw exceptions::invalid_request_exception(format("Invalid operation ({}) for non counter column {}", to_string(receiver), receiver.name_as_text()));
} else if (!ctype->is_multi_cell()) {
throw exceptions::invalid_request_exception(format("Invalid operation ({}) for frozen collection column {}", to_string(receiver), receiver.name_as_text()));
}
@@ -184,12 +194,21 @@ shared_ptr<operation>
operation::subtraction::prepare(data_dictionary::database db, const sstring& keyspace, const column_definition& receiver) const {
auto ctype = dynamic_pointer_cast<const collection_type_impl>(receiver.type);
if (!ctype) {
if (!receiver.is_counter()) {
throw exceptions::invalid_request_exception(format("Invalid operation ({}) for non counter column {}", to_string(receiver), receiver.name_as_text()));
if (receiver.is_counter()) {
auto v = prepare_expression(_value, db, keyspace, nullptr, receiver.column_specification);
verify_no_aggregate_functions(v, "SET clause");
return make_shared<constants::subtracter>(receiver, std::move(v));
}
auto v = prepare_expression(_value, db, keyspace, nullptr, receiver.column_specification);
verify_no_aggregate_functions(v, "SET clause");
return make_shared<constants::subtracter>(receiver, std::move(v));
if (receiver.type->is_arithmetic()) {
auto v = prepare_expression(_value, db, keyspace, nullptr, receiver.column_specification);
verify_no_aggregate_functions(v, "SET clause");
expr::expression arith_expr = expr::binary_operator(
expr::column_value{&receiver},
expr::oper_t::SUB,
v);
return make_shared<constants::setter>(receiver, std::move(arith_expr));
}
throw exceptions::invalid_request_exception(format("Invalid operation ({}) for non counter column {}", to_string(receiver), receiver.name_as_text()));
}
if (!ctype->is_multi_cell()) {
throw exceptions::invalid_request_exception(

View File

@@ -66,13 +66,33 @@ public:
}
/**
* @return whether the operation requires a read of the previous value to be executed
* (only lists setterByIdx, discard and discardByIdx requires that).
* @return whether the operation requires a read of the previous value to
* be executed. In traditional CQL only a few specific list operations
* perform read before the write, *non-atomically*:
* - lists::setter_by_index (SET c[i] = v)
* - lists::discarder (SET c = c - [v])
* - lists::discarder_by_index (DELETE c[i])
*
* We're gradually adding ScyllaDB-only CQL extensions to allow additional
* expressions that need to read the old value of the row, e.g.,
* SET r = r + 1. The operations will set require_read() to true, but will
* also set requires_lwt() to true to require that this operation must be
* execute in an LWT update - and this will guarantee that so the read-
* modify-write operation is atomic.
*/
virtual bool requires_read() const {
return false;
}
/**
* @return whether the operation is only valid in an LWT (conditional)
* update. For example, non-counter arithmetic (e.g. SET r = r + 1 on a
* regular column) requires LWT so that the read-modify-write is atomic.
*/
virtual bool requires_lwt() const {
return false;
}
/**
* Collects the column specification for the bind variables of this operation.
*

View File

@@ -761,6 +761,10 @@ void modification_statement::add_operation(::shared_ptr<operation> op) {
}
}
if (op->requires_lwt()) {
_requires_lwt = true;
}
if (op->column.is_counter()) {
auto is_raw_counter_shard_write = op->is_raw_counter_shard_write();
if (_is_raw_counter_shard_write && _is_raw_counter_shard_write != is_raw_counter_shard_write) {

View File

@@ -80,6 +80,9 @@ private:
// True if any of update operations requires a prefetch.
// Pre-computed during statement prepare.
bool _requires_read = false;
// True if any of the update operations requires LWT (an IF condition) for
// atomicity, e.g. SET col = col + 1 on a non-counter column.
bool _requires_lwt = false;
bool _if_not_exists = false;
bool _if_exists = false;
@@ -186,6 +189,9 @@ public:
// a prefetch of the old cell.
bool requires_read() const { return _requires_read; }
// True if any of the update operations requires LWT for atomicity.
bool requires_lwt() const { return _requires_lwt; }
// Columns used in this statement conditions or operations.
const column_set& columns_to_read() const { return _columns_to_read; }

View File

@@ -497,6 +497,10 @@ update_statement::prepare_internal(data_dictionary::database db, schema_ptr sche
}
prepare_conditions(db, *schema, ctx, *stmt);
stmt->process_where_clause(db, _where_clause, ctx);
if (stmt->requires_lwt() && !stmt->has_conditions()) {
throw exceptions::invalid_request_exception(
"SET with a column expression (e.g. col = col + 1) requires an LWT condition (e.g., IF col != NULL or IF EXISTS) to ensure atomic read-before-write");
}
return stmt;
}

View File

@@ -340,6 +340,38 @@ You can use lightweight transactions for any of the following activities:
(8 rows)
Arithmetic SET in a LWT update (ScyllaDB extension)
----------------------------------------------------
ScyllaDB allows ``SET col = col + value`` and ``SET col = col - value`` on
non-counter numeric columns in a conditional ``UPDATE``. Because the statement
is executed as an LWT, the read-modify-write is atomic: no separate read and
no race condition. An ``IF`` condition is required; without it ScyllaDB
rejects the statement.
If the column is null, the arithmetic result is also null (standard SQL
null-propagation semantics), so the column remains unset. To catch an
uninitialized column, use an ``IF`` condition that checks the column directly
(e.g. ``IF r != null``) rather than ``IF EXISTS``.
.. code-block:: cql
-- Initialize a row, with numeric regular column r set to 0:
INSERT INTO mytable (pk, ck, r) VALUES (1, 1, 0) IF NOT EXISTS;
-- Increment r atomically:
UPDATE mytable SET r = r + 1 WHERE pk = 1 AND ck = 1 IF EXISTS;
-- Increment r atomically - and visibly fail if r was not initialized:
UPDATE mytable SET r = r + 1 WHERE pk = 1 AND ck = 1 IF r != null;
-- Decrement r by 5 only when the value is large enough:
UPDATE mytable SET r = r - 5 WHERE pk = 1 AND ck = 1 IF r >= 5;
.. note::
This syntax is a ScyllaDB extension and is not supported by Apache Cassandra.
Update a table using a LWT
--------------------------

View File

@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ How is it different?
* For batch statement, ScyllaDB allows mixing `IF EXISTS`, `IF NOT EXISTS`, and other conditions for the same row.
* Unlike Cassandra, ScyllaDB uses per-core data partitioning, so the RPC that is done to perform a transaction talks directly to the right core on a peer replica, avoiding the concurrency overhead. This is, of course, true, if ScyllaDBs own shard-aware driver is used - otherwise we add an extra hop to the right core at the coordinator node.
* ScyllaDB does not store hints for lightweight transaction writes, since this is redundant as all such writes are already present in system.paxos table.
* ScyllaDB supports arithmetic ``SET`` operations (``col = col + value`` and ``col = col - value``) on non-counter numeric columns inside LWT conditional updates. Cassandra does not support this syntax.
More on :doc:`Lightweight Transactions (LWT) </features/lwt>`
@@ -19,6 +20,40 @@ More on :doc:`Lightweight Transactions (LWT) </features/lwt>`
Additional Notes
================
Arithmetic SET operations in LWT updates
----------------------------------------
ScyllaDB allows ``SET col = col + value`` and ``SET col = col - value`` on non-counter numeric
columns inside a conditional ``UPDATE``. The Paxos read-modify-write cycle guarantees atomicity:
the old value is read in the same transaction round, the arithmetic is applied, and the result
is written — all without a separate read or a race condition.
If the column is null, the arithmetic result is also null (standard SQL null-propagation
semantics), so the column remains unset. To catch an uninitialized column, use an ``IF``
condition that checks the column value (e.g. ``IF score != null``) rather than ``IF EXISTS``.
This syntax is a ScyllaDB extension; Cassandra rejects it with an ``InvalidRequest`` error.
An ``IF`` condition (``IF EXISTS`` or a column predicate) is required; omitting the ``IF``
clause is rejected even in ScyllaDB, because without LWT atomicity the read-modify-write
would not be safe.
Example — atomic counter on a regular column:
.. code-block:: cql
-- Initialize a row, with score=0
INSERT INTO mytable (pk, ck, score) VALUES (1, 1, 0) IF NOT EXISTS;
-- Increment atomically:
UPDATE mytable SET score = score + 1 WHERE pk = 1 AND ck = 1 IF EXISTS;
-- Increment only when score is already set (fails if score is null):
UPDATE mytable SET score = score + 1 WHERE pk = 1 AND ck = 1 IF score != null;
-- Decrement only when the value is large enough:
UPDATE mytable SET score = score - 5 WHERE pk = 1 AND ck = 1 IF score >= 5;
Mixing LWT IF clauses in BATCH statements
-----------------------------------------

View File

@@ -575,6 +575,6 @@ def testThatUpdatesWithEmptyInRestrictionDoNotCreateMutations(cql, test_keyspace
def testAdderNonCounter(cql, test_keyspace):
with create_table(cql, test_keyspace, f"(pk int PRIMARY KEY, a int, b text)") as table:
# if error ever includes "b" its safe to update this test
with pytest.raises(InvalidRequest, match=re.escape('Invalid operation (a = a + 1) for non counter column a')):
# Cassandra complains about column "a", Scylla about "b", both are fine
with pytest.raises(InvalidRequest, match='Invalid operation.* for non counter column'):
execute(cql, table, "UPDATE %s SET a = a + 1, b = b + 'fail' WHERE pk = 1")

View File

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
import re
import pytest
from cassandra.protocol import InvalidRequest
from cassandra.protocol import InvalidRequest, SyntaxException
from .util import new_test_table, unique_key_int
@@ -208,3 +208,254 @@ def test_lwt_insert_json_if_not_exists(cql, table1):
# The following assert failed in #8682 (the INSERT was done despite the
# row existing).
assert list(cql.execute(f'SELECT * FROM {table1} WHERE p={p}')) == [(p, 1, None, 1)]
# Test that the counter syntax SET i = i + 1 is not allowed on non-counter
# columns. This prepares us to test the same thing for LWT updates, in the
# next test.
def test_counter_syntax_non_counter(cql, table1):
p = unique_key_int()
# Without an LWT condition, arithmetic on non-counter columns is rejected.
with pytest.raises(InvalidRequest):
cql.execute(f'UPDATE {table1} SET r = r + 1 WHERE p={p} AND c=1')
with pytest.raises(InvalidRequest):
cql.execute(f'UPDATE {table1} SET r = r - 1 WHERE p={p} AND c=1')
# Test that arithmetic SET without an IF clause is rejected at prepare time,
# not silently cached and only rejected at execution (in the previous test,
# test_counter_syntax_non_counter, we tested execution).
def test_counter_syntax_non_counter_prepare(cql, table1):
# PREPARE without IF clause must fail immediately, not succeed and then
# fail later at EXECUTE time.
with pytest.raises(InvalidRequest):
cql.prepare(f'UPDATE {table1} SET r = r + 1 WHERE p = ? AND c = ?')
with pytest.raises(InvalidRequest):
cql.prepare(f'UPDATE {table1} SET r = r - 1 WHERE p = ? AND c = ?')
# Test that the counter syntax SET r = r + 1 IS allowed in an LWT update
# on non-counter integer columns (issue #10568). This is a Scylla extension
# (Cassandra rejects it). The underlying CAS mechanism reads the old value
# and writes the incremented result atomically.
def test_lwt_counter_syntax(cql, table1, scylla_only):
p = unique_key_int()
# Insert a row with r explicitly set to 0. Arithmetic on a null column
# is an error, so the column must have a value before using arithmetic SET.
cql.execute(f'INSERT INTO {table1} (p, c, r) VALUES ({p}, 1, 0)')
# Increment r from 0 to 1:
rs = list(cql.execute(f'UPDATE {table1} SET r = r + 1 WHERE p={p} AND c=1 IF EXISTS'))
assert len(rs) == 1 and rs[0].applied
assert list(cql.execute(f'SELECT r FROM {table1} WHERE p={p} AND c=1')) == [(1,)]
# Increment again by 3. r is now 1, so it will increment to 4:
rs = list(cql.execute(f'UPDATE {table1} SET r = r + 3 WHERE p={p} AND c=1 IF EXISTS'))
assert len(rs) == 1 and rs[0].applied
assert list(cql.execute(f'SELECT r FROM {table1} WHERE p={p} AND c=1')) == [(4,)]
# Subtraction also works, decrement r by 2 so it will go from 4 to 2. This
# time we'll use a condition on r itself, the condition is on r before the
# update.
rs = list(cql.execute(f'UPDATE {table1} SET r = r - 2 WHERE p={p} AND c=1 IF r = 4'))
assert len(rs) == 1 and rs[0].applied
assert list(cql.execute(f'SELECT r FROM {table1} WHERE p={p} AND c=1')) == [(2,)]
# Try a more sophisticated condition on the arithmetic operation:
# Decrement N from r, but only if r>=N. Try it for one N where it
# fails (3) and one where it succeeds (1).
rs = list(cql.execute(f'UPDATE {table1} SET r = r - 3 WHERE p={p} AND c=1 IF r >= 3'))
assert len(rs) == 1 and not rs[0].applied
assert list(cql.execute(f'SELECT r FROM {table1} WHERE p={p} AND c=1')) == [(2,)]
rs = list(cql.execute(f'UPDATE {table1} SET r = r - 1 WHERE p={p} AND c=1 IF r >= 1'))
assert len(rs) == 1 and rs[0].applied
assert list(cql.execute(f'SELECT r FROM {table1} WHERE p={p} AND c=1')) == [(1,)]
# Arithmetic on a null just results in a null, so "r = r + 1" just does nothing
# if r was never initialized - it is NOT caught as an error. This is how
# expressions work in SQL, but can be considered a footgun; In contrast,
# DynamoDB does throw an error when an expression uses an uninitialized
# attribute.
def test_lwt_counter_syntax_null_column(cql, table1, scylla_only):
p = unique_key_int()
cql.execute(f'INSERT INTO {table1} (p, c) VALUES ({p}, 1) IF NOT EXISTS')
# At this point, the row (p, 1) exists but has r is null.
rs = list(cql.execute(f'UPDATE {table1} SET r = r + 1 WHERE p={p} AND c=1 IF EXISTS'))
# The condition IF EXISTS was true (the row exists), so the LWT was applied.
assert len(rs) == 1 and rs[0].applied
# But the column r was not written: r + 1 where r is null results in null,
# so r should still be unset.
assert cql.execute(f'SELECT r FROM {table1} WHERE p={p} AND c=1').one().r is None
# Verify the same for subtraction:
rs = list(cql.execute(f'UPDATE {table1} SET r = r - 1 WHERE p={p} AND c=1 IF EXISTS'))
assert len(rs) == 1 and rs[0].applied
assert cql.execute(f'SELECT r FROM {table1} WHERE p={p} AND c=1').one().r is None
# We can achieve the same thing with a condition on r (r != null)
# instead of on the row (IF EXISTS). But the difference in this case is
# that a condition on r allows the user to catch an uninitialized r, by
# noticing that the LWT condition failed.
rs = list(cql.execute(f'UPDATE {table1} SET r = r + 1 WHERE p={p} AND c=1 IF r != null'))
assert len(rs) == 1 and not rs[0].applied
assert cql.execute(f'SELECT r FROM {table1} WHERE p={p} AND c=1').one().r is None
# After initializing r, the condition passes and the increment takes effect.
cql.execute(f'UPDATE {table1} SET r = 0 WHERE p={p} AND c=1')
rs = list(cql.execute(f'UPDATE {table1} SET r = r + 1 WHERE p={p} AND c=1 IF r != null'))
assert len(rs) == 1 and rs[0].applied
assert cql.execute(f'SELECT r FROM {table1} WHERE p={p} AND c=1').one().r == 1
# Test that the LWT counter syntax is allowed for all numeric types, not just
# integers. This is a Scylla extension (issue #10568).
def test_lwt_counter_syntax_numeric_types(cql, test_keyspace, scylla_only):
# All CQL numeric types that should support arithmetic SET in LWT updates.
numeric_types = ['tinyint', 'smallint', 'int', 'bigint', 'varint', 'float', 'double', 'decimal']
# Build a table with one column per numeric type, all named col_<type>.
col_defs = ', '.join(f'col_{t} {t}' for t in numeric_types)
schema = f'p int PRIMARY KEY, {col_defs}'
with new_test_table(cql, test_keyspace, schema) as table:
p = unique_key_int()
# Initialize all columns to 0; arithmetic requires a non-null value.
col_names = ', '.join(f'col_{t}' for t in numeric_types)
zero_vals = ', '.join(['0'] * len(numeric_types))
cql.execute(f'INSERT INTO {table} (p, {col_names}) VALUES ({p}, {zero_vals})')
for t in numeric_types:
col = f'col_{t}'
# Increment from 0 to 1 using IF EXISTS.
rs = list(cql.execute(f'UPDATE {table} SET {col} = {col} + 1 WHERE p = {p} IF EXISTS'))
assert len(rs) == 1 and rs[0].applied, f'increment from 0 failed for type {t}'
row = cql.execute(f'SELECT {col} FROM {table} WHERE p = {p}').one()
assert getattr(row, col) == 1, f'expected 1 after increment for type {t}, got {getattr(row, col)}'
# Increment again from 1 to 2.
rs = list(cql.execute(f'UPDATE {table} SET {col} = {col} + 1 WHERE p = {p} IF EXISTS'))
assert len(rs) == 1 and rs[0].applied, f'second increment failed for type {t}'
row = cql.execute(f'SELECT {col} FROM {table} WHERE p = {p}').one()
assert getattr(row, col) == 2, f'expected 2 after second increment for type {t}, got {getattr(row, col)}'
# Subtract 1 from 2, leaving 1.
rs = list(cql.execute(f'UPDATE {table} SET {col} = {col} - 1 WHERE p = {p} IF EXISTS'))
assert len(rs) == 1 and rs[0].applied, f'subtraction failed for type {t}'
row = cql.execute(f'SELECT {col} FROM {table} WHERE p = {p}').one()
assert getattr(row, col) == 1, f'expected 1 after subtraction for type {t}, got {getattr(row, col)}'
# Currently, the syntax "SET r = p + 1" (different column on LHS and RHS) is
# NOT allowed - the CQL grammar only allows "X = X +/- value", so mismatching
# columns is a syntax error, regardless of whether the statement has an IF
# clause. We may decide to allow this syntax in the future, in which case
# this test should be changed - but for now we don't support it.
def test_lwt_counter_syntax_mismatched_column(cql, table1):
p = unique_key_int()
# The grammar rejects r = p + 1 (p != r) as a SyntaxException.
with pytest.raises(SyntaxException, match='Only expressions of the form X = X'):
cql.execute(f'UPDATE {table1} SET r = p + 1 WHERE p={p} AND c=1 IF EXISTS')
with pytest.raises(SyntaxException, match='Only expressions of the form X = X'):
cql.execute(f'UPDATE {table1} SET r = p - 1 WHERE p={p} AND c=1 IF EXISTS')
# Also rejected without an IF clause:
with pytest.raises(SyntaxException, match='Only expressions of the form X = X'):
cql.execute(f'UPDATE {table1} SET r = p + 1 WHERE p={p} AND c=1')
# We checked the LWT counter syntax SET r = r + 1 on regular columns, let's
# check that it's *not* allowed for key columns: p and c are numeric but still
# not allowed because they cannot be set by an UPDATE.
def test_lwt_counter_forbidden_key_columns(cql, table1):
p = unique_key_int()
with pytest.raises(InvalidRequest, match='PRIMARY KEY'):
cql.execute(f'UPDATE {table1} SET p = p + 1 WHERE p={p} AND c=1 IF EXISTS')
with pytest.raises(InvalidRequest, match='PRIMARY KEY'):
cql.execute(f'UPDATE {table1} SET c = c + 1 WHERE p={p} AND c=1 IF EXISTS')
# Test that the LWT counter syntax works in prepared statements, including
# the operand coming from a bind variable.
def test_lwt_counter_syntax_prepared(cql, table1, scylla_only):
p = unique_key_int()
cql.execute(f'INSERT INTO {table1} (p, c, r) VALUES ({p}, 1, 10)')
# Prepare a statement with a bind variable for the increment delta.
inc_stmt = cql.prepare(f'UPDATE {table1} SET r = r + ? WHERE p = ? AND c = ? IF EXISTS')
dec_stmt = cql.prepare(f'UPDATE {table1} SET r = r - ? WHERE p = ? AND c = ? IF EXISTS')
# Increment r by 5: 10 -> 15.
rs = list(cql.execute(inc_stmt, [5, p, 1]))
assert len(rs) == 1 and rs[0].applied
assert cql.execute(f'SELECT r FROM {table1} WHERE p={p} AND c=1').one().r == 15
# Decrement r by 3: 15 -> 12.
rs = list(cql.execute(dec_stmt, [3, p, 1]))
assert len(rs) == 1 and rs[0].applied
assert cql.execute(f'SELECT r FROM {table1} WHERE p={p} AND c=1').one().r == 12
# Execute the same prepared statement again with a different delta: 12 -> 17.
rs = list(cql.execute(inc_stmt, [5, p, 1]))
assert len(rs) == 1 and rs[0].applied
assert cql.execute(f'SELECT r FROM {table1} WHERE p={p} AND c=1').one().r == 17
# A failed condition leaves r unchanged.
rs = list(cql.execute(dec_stmt, [100, p, 999])) # c=999 does not exist
assert len(rs) == 1 and not rs[0].applied
assert cql.execute(f'SELECT r FROM {table1} WHERE p={p} AND c=1').one().r == 17
# Test that the LWT counter syntax (add and subtract) catches overflows and
# underflows for fixed-width integer types (tinyint, smallint, int, bigint)
# and doesn't allow them to wrap around.
def test_lwt_counter_syntax_overflow(cql, test_keyspace, scylla_only):
# (type name, bits) for each fixed-width signed integer type.
integer_types = [
('tinyint', 8),
('smallint', 16),
('int', 32),
('bigint', 64),
]
col_defs = ', '.join(f'col_{t} {t}' for t, _ in integer_types)
schema = f'p int PRIMARY KEY, {col_defs}'
with new_test_table(cql, test_keyspace, schema) as table:
p = unique_key_int()
for t, bits in integer_types:
col = f'col_{t}'
max_val = 2**(bits-1) - 1
min_val = -(2**(bits-1))
# Incrementing past the maximum must be rejected, not wrap around.
cql.execute(f'UPDATE {table} SET {col} = {max_val} WHERE p = {p}')
with pytest.raises(InvalidRequest, match='overflow'):
cql.execute(f'UPDATE {table} SET {col} = {col} + 1 WHERE p = {p} IF {col} = {max_val}')
# Likewise, decrementing past the minimum must be rejected.
cql.execute(f'UPDATE {table} SET {col} = {min_val} WHERE p = {p}')
with pytest.raises(InvalidRequest, match='overflow'):
cql.execute(f'UPDATE {table} SET {col} = {col} - 1 WHERE p = {p} IF {col} = {min_val}')
# The subtraction -1 - MININT should *not* overflow, it has a valid
# result MAXINT. This forced us to implement a separate SUB
# operation, not just ADD and NEG (unary minus), because NEG on
# MININT overflows.
cql.execute(f'UPDATE {table} SET {col} = -1 WHERE p = {p}')
stmt = cql.prepare(f'UPDATE {table} SET {col} = {col} - ? WHERE p = ? IF {col} = -1')
cql.execute(stmt, [min_val, p])
assert cql.execute(f'SELECT {col} FROM {table} WHERE p = {p}').one()[0] == max_val
# Test that adding a float literal (3.5) to an int column is rejected at
# because 3.5 is not a valid integer value.
def test_lwt_counter_syntax_float_on_integer(cql, table1, scylla_only):
p = unique_key_int()
cql.execute(f'INSERT INTO {table1} (p, c, r) VALUES ({p}, 1, 0)')
with pytest.raises(InvalidRequest, match='of type int'):
cql.execute(f'UPDATE {table1} SET r = r + 3.5 WHERE p={p} AND c=1 IF EXISTS')
with pytest.raises(InvalidRequest, match='of type int'):
cql.execute(f'UPDATE {table1} SET r = r - 3.5 WHERE p={p} AND c=1 IF EXISTS')
# Verify the type check is enforced at prepare time if 3.5 is a constant,
# or at execute time if 3.5 is a bind variable:
with pytest.raises(InvalidRequest, match='of type int'):
cql.prepare(f'UPDATE {table1} SET r = r + 3.5 WHERE p = ? AND c = ? IF EXISTS')
with pytest.raises(InvalidRequest, match='of type int'):
cql.prepare(f'UPDATE {table1} SET r = r - 3.5 WHERE p = ? AND c = ? IF EXISTS')
inc_stmt = cql.prepare(f'UPDATE {table1} SET r = r + ? WHERE p = ? AND c = ? IF EXISTS')
dec_stmt = cql.prepare(f'UPDATE {table1} SET r = r - ? WHERE p = ? AND c = ? IF EXISTS')
# When 3.5 is a bind variable, the Python driver catches the type mismatch
# itself before sending the request to Scylla, raising a TypeError.
# We don't intend the Python driver, but this check verifies that the
# server correctly told the driver which type it expects for the bind
# variable.
with pytest.raises(TypeError):
cql.execute(inc_stmt, [3.5, p, 1])
with pytest.raises(TypeError):
cql.execute(dec_stmt, [3.5, p, 1])
# Test that trying to add "decimal" values with wildly different scales is
# rejected with an error, not allowed to proceed with ridiculous amount of
# CPU and memory usage. Reproduces SCYLLADB-1576.
# This test needs to be skipped while SCYLLADB-1576 is not fixed, otherwise
# it will cause the test suite to hang or crash.
@pytest.mark.skip_bug(reason="SCYLLADB-1576: hangs or OOMs instead of rejecting")
def test_lwt_counter_syntax_decimal_magnitude_difference(cql, test_keyspace, scylla_only):
# 1e100000000 is stored compactly as (unscaled=1, scale=-100000000), but
# adding 1 to it forces alignment of decimal points, potentially allocating
# 100 million digits and running out of memory.
with new_test_table(cql, test_keyspace, 'p int PRIMARY KEY, d decimal') as table:
p = unique_key_int()
cql.execute(f"INSERT INTO {table} (p, d) VALUES ({p}, 1e100000000)")
with pytest.raises(InvalidRequest):
cql.execute(f"UPDATE {table} SET d = d + 1 WHERE p = {p} IF EXISTS")