e333bcc2da
as this syntax is not supported by the standard, it seems clang
just silently construct the value with the initializer list and
calls the operator=, but GCC complains:
```
/home/kefu/dev/scylladb/cdc/split.cc:392:54: error: converting to ‘std::optional<partition_deletion>’ from initializer list would use explicit constructor ‘constexpr std::optional<_Tp>::optional(_Up&&) [with _Up = const tombstone&; typename std::enable_if<__and_v<std::__not_<std::is_same<std::optional<_Tp>, typename std::remove_cv<typename std::remove_reference<_Iter>::type>::type> >, std::__not_<std::is_same<std::in_place_t, typename std::remove_cv<typename std::remove_reference<_Iter>::type>::type> >, std::is_constructible<_Tp, _Up>, std::__not_<std::is_convertible<_Iter, _Iterator> > >, bool>::type <anonymous> = false; _Tp = partition_deletion]’
392 | _result[t.timestamp].partition_deletions = {t};
| ^
```
to silences the error, and to be more standard compliant,
let's use emplace() instead.
Signed-off-by: Kefu Chai <kefu.chai@scylladb.com>
29 KiB
29 KiB