Create policy_engine_distributed_test.go

2026-08-19 05:36:58 +00:00 · 2025-08-24 13:29:12 -07:00
parent beb23b0ab5
commit cdb135bc44
1 changed files with 386 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,386 @@
+package policy
+
+import (
+	"context"
+	"fmt"
+	"testing"
+	"time"
+
+	"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
+	"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
+)
+
+// TestDistributedPolicyEngine verifies that multiple PolicyEngine instances with identical configurations
+// behave consistently across distributed environments
+func TestDistributedPolicyEngine(t *testing.T) {
+	ctx := context.Background()
+
+	// Common configuration for all instances
+	commonConfig := &PolicyEngineConfig{
+		DefaultEffect: "Deny",
+		StoreType:     "memory", // For testing - would be "filer" in production
+		StoreConfig:   map[string]interface{}{},
+	}
+
+	// Create multiple PolicyEngine instances simulating distributed deployment
+	instance1 := NewPolicyEngine()
+	instance2 := NewPolicyEngine()
+	instance3 := NewPolicyEngine()
+
+	// Initialize all instances with identical configuration
+	err := instance1.Initialize(commonConfig)
+	require.NoError(t, err, "Instance 1 should initialize successfully")
+
+	err = instance2.Initialize(commonConfig)
+	require.NoError(t, err, "Instance 2 should initialize successfully")
+
+	err = instance3.Initialize(commonConfig)
+	require.NoError(t, err, "Instance 3 should initialize successfully")
+
+	// Test policy consistency across instances
+	t.Run("policy_storage_consistency", func(t *testing.T) {
+		// Define a test policy
+		testPolicy := &PolicyDocument{
+			Version: "2012-10-17",
+			Statement: []Statement{
+				{
+					Sid:      "AllowS3Read",
+					Effect:   "Allow",
+					Action:   []string{"s3:GetObject", "s3:ListBucket"},
+					Resource: []string{"arn:seaweed:s3:::test-bucket/*", "arn:seaweed:s3:::test-bucket"},
+				},
+				{
+					Sid:      "DenyS3Write",
+					Effect:   "Deny",
+					Action:   []string{"s3:PutObject", "s3:DeleteObject"},
+					Resource: []string{"arn:seaweed:s3:::test-bucket/*"},
+				},
+			},
+		}
+
+		// Store policy on instance 1
+		err := instance1.AddPolicy("TestPolicy", testPolicy)
+		require.NoError(t, err, "Should be able to store policy on instance 1")
+
+		// For memory storage, each instance has separate storage
+		// In production with filer storage, all instances would share the same policies
+
+		// Verify policy exists on instance 1
+		storedPolicy1, err := instance1.store.GetPolicy(ctx, "TestPolicy")
+		require.NoError(t, err, "Policy should exist on instance 1")
+		assert.Equal(t, "2012-10-17", storedPolicy1.Version)
+		assert.Len(t, storedPolicy1.Statement, 2)
+
+		// For demonstration: store same policy on other instances
+		err = instance2.AddPolicy("TestPolicy", testPolicy)
+		require.NoError(t, err, "Should be able to store policy on instance 2")
+
+		err = instance3.AddPolicy("TestPolicy", testPolicy)
+		require.NoError(t, err, "Should be able to store policy on instance 3")
+	})
+
+	// Test policy evaluation consistency
+	t.Run("evaluation_consistency", func(t *testing.T) {
+		// Create evaluation context
+		evalCtx := &EvaluationContext{
+			Principal: "arn:seaweed:sts::assumed-role/TestRole/session",
+			Action:    "s3:GetObject",
+			Resource:  "arn:seaweed:s3:::test-bucket/file.txt",
+			RequestContext: map[string]interface{}{
+				"sourceIp": "192.168.1.100",
+			},
+		}
+
+		// Evaluate policy on all instances
+		result1, err1 := instance1.Evaluate(ctx, evalCtx, []string{"TestPolicy"})
+		result2, err2 := instance2.Evaluate(ctx, evalCtx, []string{"TestPolicy"})
+		result3, err3 := instance3.Evaluate(ctx, evalCtx, []string{"TestPolicy"})
+
+		require.NoError(t, err1, "Evaluation should succeed on instance 1")
+		require.NoError(t, err2, "Evaluation should succeed on instance 2")
+		require.NoError(t, err3, "Evaluation should succeed on instance 3")
+
+		// All instances should return identical results
+		assert.Equal(t, result1.Effect, result2.Effect, "Instance 1 and 2 should have same effect")
+		assert.Equal(t, result2.Effect, result3.Effect, "Instance 2 and 3 should have same effect")
+		assert.Equal(t, EffectAllow, result1.Effect, "Should allow s3:GetObject")
+
+		// Matching statements should be identical
+		assert.Len(t, result1.MatchingStatements, 1, "Should have one matching statement")
+		assert.Len(t, result2.MatchingStatements, 1, "Should have one matching statement")
+		assert.Len(t, result3.MatchingStatements, 1, "Should have one matching statement")
+
+		assert.Equal(t, "AllowS3Read", result1.MatchingStatements[0].StatementSid)
+		assert.Equal(t, "AllowS3Read", result2.MatchingStatements[0].StatementSid)
+		assert.Equal(t, "AllowS3Read", result3.MatchingStatements[0].StatementSid)
+	})
+
+	// Test explicit deny precedence
+	t.Run("deny_precedence_consistency", func(t *testing.T) {
+		evalCtx := &EvaluationContext{
+			Principal: "arn:seaweed:sts::assumed-role/TestRole/session",
+			Action:    "s3:PutObject",
+			Resource:  "arn:seaweed:s3:::test-bucket/newfile.txt",
+		}
+
+		// All instances should consistently apply deny precedence
+		result1, err1 := instance1.Evaluate(ctx, evalCtx, []string{"TestPolicy"})
+		result2, err2 := instance2.Evaluate(ctx, evalCtx, []string{"TestPolicy"})
+		result3, err3 := instance3.Evaluate(ctx, evalCtx, []string{"TestPolicy"})
+
+		require.NoError(t, err1)
+		require.NoError(t, err2)
+		require.NoError(t, err3)
+
+		// All should deny due to explicit deny statement
+		assert.Equal(t, EffectDeny, result1.Effect, "Instance 1 should deny write operation")
+		assert.Equal(t, EffectDeny, result2.Effect, "Instance 2 should deny write operation")
+		assert.Equal(t, EffectDeny, result3.Effect, "Instance 3 should deny write operation")
+
+		// Should have matching deny statement
+		assert.Len(t, result1.MatchingStatements, 1)
+		assert.Equal(t, "DenyS3Write", result1.MatchingStatements[0].StatementSid)
+		assert.Equal(t, EffectDeny, result1.MatchingStatements[0].Effect)
+	})
+
+	// Test default effect consistency
+	t.Run("default_effect_consistency", func(t *testing.T) {
+		evalCtx := &EvaluationContext{
+			Principal: "arn:seaweed:sts::assumed-role/TestRole/session",
+			Action:    "filer:CreateEntry", // Action not covered by any policy
+			Resource:  "arn:seaweed:filer::path/test",
+		}
+
+		result1, err1 := instance1.Evaluate(ctx, evalCtx, []string{"TestPolicy"})
+		result2, err2 := instance2.Evaluate(ctx, evalCtx, []string{"TestPolicy"})
+		result3, err3 := instance3.Evaluate(ctx, evalCtx, []string{"TestPolicy"})
+
+		require.NoError(t, err1)
+		require.NoError(t, err2)
+		require.NoError(t, err3)
+
+		// All should use default effect (Deny)
+		assert.Equal(t, EffectDeny, result1.Effect, "Should use default effect")
+		assert.Equal(t, EffectDeny, result2.Effect, "Should use default effect")
+		assert.Equal(t, EffectDeny, result3.Effect, "Should use default effect")
+
+		// No matching statements
+		assert.Empty(t, result1.MatchingStatements, "Should have no matching statements")
+		assert.Empty(t, result2.MatchingStatements, "Should have no matching statements")
+		assert.Empty(t, result3.MatchingStatements, "Should have no matching statements")
+	})
+}
+
+// TestPolicyEngineConfigurationConsistency tests configuration validation for distributed deployments
+func TestPolicyEngineConfigurationConsistency(t *testing.T) {
+	t.Run("consistent_default_effects_required", func(t *testing.T) {
+		// Different default effects could lead to inconsistent authorization
+		config1 := &PolicyEngineConfig{
+			DefaultEffect: "Allow",
+			StoreType:     "memory",
+		}
+
+		config2 := &PolicyEngineConfig{
+			DefaultEffect: "Deny", // Different default!
+			StoreType:     "memory",
+		}
+
+		instance1 := NewPolicyEngine()
+		instance2 := NewPolicyEngine()
+
+		err1 := instance1.Initialize(config1)
+		err2 := instance2.Initialize(config2)
+
+		require.NoError(t, err1)
+		require.NoError(t, err2)
+
+		// Test with an action not covered by any policy
+		evalCtx := &EvaluationContext{
+			Principal: "arn:seaweed:sts::assumed-role/TestRole/session",
+			Action:    "uncovered:action",
+			Resource:  "arn:seaweed:test:::resource",
+		}
+
+		result1, _ := instance1.Evaluate(context.Background(), evalCtx, []string{})
+		result2, _ := instance2.Evaluate(context.Background(), evalCtx, []string{})
+
+		// Results should be different due to different default effects
+		assert.NotEqual(t, result1.Effect, result2.Effect, "Different default effects should produce different results")
+		assert.Equal(t, EffectAllow, result1.Effect, "Instance 1 should allow by default")
+		assert.Equal(t, EffectDeny, result2.Effect, "Instance 2 should deny by default")
+	})
+
+	t.Run("invalid_configuration_handling", func(t *testing.T) {
+		invalidConfigs := []*PolicyEngineConfig{
+			{
+				DefaultEffect: "Maybe", // Invalid effect
+				StoreType:     "memory",
+			},
+			{
+				DefaultEffect: "Allow",
+				StoreType:     "nonexistent", // Invalid store type
+			},
+		}
+
+		for i, config := range invalidConfigs {
+			t.Run(fmt.Sprintf("invalid_config_%d", i), func(t *testing.T) {
+				instance := NewPolicyEngine()
+				err := instance.Initialize(config)
+				assert.Error(t, err, "Should reject invalid configuration")
+			})
+		}
+	})
+}
+
+// TestPolicyStoreDistributed tests policy store behavior in distributed scenarios
+func TestPolicyStoreDistributed(t *testing.T) {
+	ctx := context.Background()
+
+	t.Run("memory_store_isolation", func(t *testing.T) {
+		// Memory stores are isolated per instance (not suitable for distributed)
+		store1 := NewMemoryPolicyStore()
+		store2 := NewMemoryPolicyStore()
+
+		policy := &PolicyDocument{
+			Version: "2012-10-17",
+			Statement: []Statement{
+				{
+					Effect:   "Allow",
+					Action:   []string{"s3:GetObject"},
+					Resource: []string{"*"},
+				},
+			},
+		}
+
+		// Store policy in store1
+		err := store1.StorePolicy(ctx, "TestPolicy", policy)
+		require.NoError(t, err)
+
+		// Policy should exist in store1
+		_, err = store1.GetPolicy(ctx, "TestPolicy")
+		assert.NoError(t, err, "Policy should exist in store1")
+
+		// Policy should NOT exist in store2 (different instance)
+		_, err = store2.GetPolicy(ctx, "TestPolicy")
+		assert.Error(t, err, "Policy should not exist in store2")
+		assert.Contains(t, err.Error(), "not found", "Should be a not found error")
+	})
+
+	t.Run("policy_loading_error_handling", func(t *testing.T) {
+		engine := NewPolicyEngine()
+		config := &PolicyEngineConfig{
+			DefaultEffect: "Deny",
+			StoreType:     "memory",
+		}
+
+		err := engine.Initialize(config)
+		require.NoError(t, err)
+
+		evalCtx := &EvaluationContext{
+			Principal: "arn:seaweed:sts::assumed-role/TestRole/session",
+			Action:    "s3:GetObject",
+			Resource:  "arn:seaweed:s3:::bucket/key",
+		}
+
+		// Evaluate with non-existent policies
+		result, err := engine.Evaluate(ctx, evalCtx, []string{"NonExistentPolicy1", "NonExistentPolicy2"})
+		require.NoError(t, err, "Should not error on missing policies")
+
+		// Should use default effect when no policies can be loaded
+		assert.Equal(t, EffectDeny, result.Effect, "Should use default effect")
+		assert.Empty(t, result.MatchingStatements, "Should have no matching statements")
+	})
+}
+
+// TestFilerPolicyStoreConfiguration tests filer policy store configuration for distributed deployments
+func TestFilerPolicyStoreConfiguration(t *testing.T) {
+	t.Run("filer_store_creation", func(t *testing.T) {
+		// Test with minimal configuration
+		config := map[string]interface{}{
+			"filerAddress": "localhost:8888",
+		}
+
+		store, err := NewFilerPolicyStore(config)
+		require.NoError(t, err, "Should create filer policy store with minimal config")
+		assert.NotNil(t, store)
+	})
+
+	t.Run("filer_store_custom_path", func(t *testing.T) {
+		config := map[string]interface{}{
+			"filerAddress": "prod-filer:8888",
+			"basePath":     "/custom/iam/policies",
+		}
+
+		store, err := NewFilerPolicyStore(config)
+		require.NoError(t, err, "Should create filer policy store with custom path")
+		assert.NotNil(t, store)
+	})
+
+	t.Run("filer_store_missing_address", func(t *testing.T) {
+		config := map[string]interface{}{
+			"basePath": "/seaweedfs/iam/policies",
+		}
+
+		_, err := NewFilerPolicyStore(config)
+		assert.Error(t, err, "Should require filer address")
+		assert.Contains(t, err.Error(), "filer address", "Error should mention filer address")
+	})
+}
+
+// TestPolicyEvaluationPerformance tests performance considerations for distributed policy evaluation
+func TestPolicyEvaluationPerformance(t *testing.T) {
+	ctx := context.Background()
+
+	// Create engine with memory store (for performance baseline)
+	engine := NewPolicyEngine()
+	config := &PolicyEngineConfig{
+		DefaultEffect: "Deny",
+		StoreType:     "memory",
+	}
+
+	err := engine.Initialize(config)
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	// Add multiple policies
+	for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
+		policy := &PolicyDocument{
+			Version: "2012-10-17",
+			Statement: []Statement{
+				{
+					Sid:      fmt.Sprintf("Statement%d", i),
+					Effect:   "Allow",
+					Action:   []string{"s3:GetObject", "s3:ListBucket"},
+					Resource: []string{fmt.Sprintf("arn:seaweed:s3:::bucket%d/*", i)},
+				},
+			},
+		}
+
+		err := engine.AddPolicy(fmt.Sprintf("Policy%d", i), policy)
+		require.NoError(t, err)
+	}
+
+	// Test evaluation performance
+	evalCtx := &EvaluationContext{
+		Principal: "arn:seaweed:sts::assumed-role/TestRole/session",
+		Action:    "s3:GetObject",
+		Resource:  "arn:seaweed:s3:::bucket5/file.txt",
+	}
+
+	policyNames := make([]string, 10)
+	for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
+		policyNames[i] = fmt.Sprintf("Policy%d", i)
+	}
+
+	// Measure evaluation time
+	start := time.Now()
+	for i := 0; i < 100; i++ {
+		_, err := engine.Evaluate(ctx, evalCtx, policyNames)
+		require.NoError(t, err)
+	}
+	duration := time.Since(start)
+
+	// Should be reasonably fast (less than 10ms per evaluation on average)
+	avgDuration := duration / 100
+	t.Logf("Average policy evaluation time: %v", avgDuration)
+	assert.Less(t, avgDuration, 10*time.Millisecond, "Policy evaluation should be fast")
+}