mirror of
https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint.git
synced 2026-06-01 11:56:21 +00:00
spec/consensus: canonical vs subjective commit
Refs https://github.com/tendermint/tendermint/issues/2769
This commit is contained in:
@@ -337,3 +337,13 @@ where two conflicting reorg-proposals are signed.
|
||||
Assuming that the external coordination medium and protocol is robust,
|
||||
it follows that forks are less of a concern than [censorship
|
||||
attacks](#censorship-attacks).
|
||||
|
||||
### Canonical vs subjective commit
|
||||
|
||||
We distinguish between "canonical" and "subjective" commits. The latter is what
|
||||
each validator sees locally when they decide to commit a block. The former is
|
||||
what is included by the proposer of the next block in the `LastCommit` field of
|
||||
the block. This is what makes it canonical and ensures everyone agrees on it,
|
||||
even if its different from the first +2/3 votes they saw that caused them to
|
||||
commit a block. Each block contains a canonical +2/3 commit for the previous
|
||||
block.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user