closes: #8039
This pull request updates the new ABCI++ protos to use `enum`s in place of `bool`s. `enums` may be preferred over `bool` because an `enum` can be udpated to include new statuses in the future, whereas a `bool` cannot and is fixed as just `true` or `false` over the whole lifecycle of the API.
This change implements the logic for the PrepareProposal ABCI++ method call. The main logic for creating and issuing the PrepareProposal request lives in execution.go and is tested in a set of new tests in execution_test.go. This change also updates the mempool mock to use a mockery generated version and removes much of the plumbing for the no longer used ABCIResponses.
This change set implements the most recent version of `FinalizeBlock`.
# What does this change actually contain?
* This change set is rather large but fear not! The majority of the files touched and changes are renaming `ResponseDeliverTx` to `ExecTxResult`. This should be a pretty inoffensive change since they're effectively the same type but with a different name.
* The `execBlockOnProxyApp` was totally removed since it served as just a wrapper around the logic that is now mostly encapsulated within `FinalizeBlock`
* The `updateState` helper function has been made a public method on `State`. It was being exposed as a shim through the testing infrastructure, so this seemed innocuous.
* Tests already existed to ensure that the application received the `ByzantineValidators` and the `ValidatorUpdates`, but one was fixed up to ensure that `LastCommitInfo` was being sent across.
* Tests were removed from the `psql` indexer that seemed to search for an event in the indexer that was not being created.
# Questions for reviewers
* We store this [ABCIResponses](5721a13ab1/proto/tendermint/state/types.pb.go (L37)) type in the data base as the block results. This type has changed since v0.35 to contain the `FinalizeBlock` response. I'm wondering if we need to do any shimming to keep the old data retrieveable?
* Similarly, this change is exposed via the RPC through [ResultBlockResults](5721a13ab1/rpc/coretypes/responses.go (L69)) changing. Should we somehow shim or notify for this change?
closes: #7658
This change implements the spec for `ProcessProposal`. It first calls the Tendermint block validation logic to check that all of the proposed block fields are well formed and do not violate any of the rules for Tendermint to consider the block valid and then passes the validated block the `ProcessProposal`.
This change also adds additional fixtures to test the change. It adds the `baseMock` types that holds a mock as well as a reference to `BaseApplication`. If the function was not setup by the test on the contained mock Application, the type delegates to the `BaseApplication` and returns what `BaseApplication` returns.
The change also switches the `makeState` helper to take an arg struct so that an ABCI application can be plumbed through when needed.
closes: #7656
* testing: reduce usage of the MustDefualtLogger constructor
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: M. J. Fromberger <michael.j.fromberger@gmail.com>
* cleanup tests
Co-authored-by: M. J. Fromberger <michael.j.fromberger@gmail.com>
This is the first step in removing the mutex from ABCI applications:
making our test applications hold mutexes, which this does, hopefully
with zero impact. If this lands well, then we can explore deleting the
other mutexes (in the ABCI server and the clients.) While this change
is not user impacting at all, removing the other mutexes *will* be.
In persuit of this, I've changed the KV app somewhat, to put almost
all of the logic in the base application and make the persistent
application mostly be a wrapper on top of that with a different
storage layer.
* Rebased and git-squashed the commits in PR #6546
migrate abci to finalizeBlock
work on abci, proxy and mempool
abciresponse, blok events, indexer, some tests
fix some tests
fix errors
fix errors in abci
fix tests amd errors
* Fixes after rebasing PR#6546
* Restored height to RequestFinalizeBlock & other
* Fixed more UTs
* Fixed kvstore
* More UT fixes
* last TC fixed
* make format
* Update internal/consensus/mempool_test.go
Co-authored-by: William Banfield <4561443+williambanfield@users.noreply.github.com>
* Addressed @williambanfield's comments
* Fixed UTs
* Addressed last comments from @williambanfield
* make format
Co-authored-by: marbar3778 <marbar3778@yahoo.com>
Co-authored-by: William Banfield <4561443+williambanfield@users.noreply.github.com>
This pull request merges in the changes for implementing Proposer-based timestamps into `master`. The power was primarily being done in the `wb/proposer-based-timestamps` branch, with changes being merged into that branch during development. This pull request represents an amalgamation of the changes made into that development branch. All of the changes that were placed into that branch have been cleanly rebased on top of the latest `master`. The changes compile and the tests pass insofar as our tests in general pass.
### Note To Reviewers
These changes have been extensively reviewed during development. There is not much new here. In the interest of making effective use of time, I would recommend against trying to perform a complete audit of the changes presented and instead examine for mistakes that may have occurred during the process of rebasing the changes. I gave the complete change set a first pass for any issues, but additional eyes would be very appreciated.
In sum, this change set does the following:
closes#6942
merges in #6849
The main change here is to use encoding/json to encode and decode RPC
parameters, rather than the custom tmjson package. This includes:
- Update the HTTP POST handler parameter handling.
- Add field tags to 64-bit integer types to get string encoding (to match amino/tmjson).
- Add marshalers to struct types that mention interfaces.
- Inject wrappers to decode interface arguments in RPC handlers.
*light: rpc /status returns status of light client ; code refactoring
light: moved lightClientInfo into light.go, renamed String to ID
test/e2e: Return light client trusted height instead of SyncInfo trusted height
test/e2e/start.go: Not waiting for light client to catch up in tests. Removed querying of syncInfo in start if the node is a light node
* light: Removed call to primary /status. Added trustedPeriod to light info
* light/provider: added ID function to return IP of primary and witnesses
* light/provider/http/http_test: renamed String() to ID()
The parameters for RPC GET requests are parsed from query arguments in the
request URL. Rework this code to remove the need for tmjson. The structure of a
call still requires reflection, and still works the same way as before, but the
code structure has been simplified and cleaned up a bit.
Points of note:
- Consolidate handling of pointer types, so we only need to dereference once.
- Reduce the number of allocations of reflective types.
- Report errors for unsupported types rather than returning untyped nil.
Update the tests as well. There was one test case that checked for an error on
a behaviour the OpenAPI docs explicitly demonstrates as supported, so I fixed
that test case, and also added some new ones for cases that weren't checked.
Related:
* Update e2e base Go image to 1.17 (to match config).
Instead of taking a comma-separated string of parameter names, take each
parameter name as a separate argument. Now that we no longer have an extra flag
for caching, this fits nicely into a variadic trailer.
* Update all usage of NewRPCFunc and NewWSRPCFunc.
Add writeRPCResponse and writeHTTPResponse helpers, that handle the way RPC
responses are written to HTTP replies. These replace the exported helpers.
Visible effects:
- JSON results are now marshaled without indentation.
- HTTP status codes are now normalized.
- Cache control headers are no longer set.
Details:
- When writing a response to a URL (GET) request, do not marshal the whole
JSON-RPC object into the body, only encode the result or the error object.
This is a user-visible change.
- Do not change the HTTP status code for RPC errors. The RPC error already
reports what went wrong, the HTTP status should only report problems with the
HTTP transaction itself. This is a user-visible change.
- Encode JSON without indentation in POST response bodies. This is mainly cosmetic
but saves quite a bit of response data. Indent is still applied to GET responses to make
life easier for code examples.
- Remove an obsolete TODO about reporting an HTTP error on websocket upgrade.
Nothing needed to change; the upgrader already reports an error.
- Report an HTTP error when starting the server loop fails.
- Improve logging for encoding errors.
- Log less aggressively.
We should not set cache-control headers on RPC responses. HTTP caching
interacts poorly with resources that are expected to change frequently, or
whose rate of change is unpredictable.
More subtly, all calls to the POST endpoint use the same URL, which means a
cacheable response from one call may actually "hide" an uncacheable response
from a subsequent one. This is less of a problem for the GET endpoints, but
that means the behaviour of RPCs varies depending on which HTTP method your
client happens to use. Websocket requests were already marked statically
uncacheable, adding yet a third combination.
To address this:
- Stop setting cache-control headers.
- Update the tests that were checking for those headers.
- Remove the flags to request cache-control.
Apart from affecting the HTTP response headers, this change does not modify the
behaviour of any of the RPC methods.
This continues the push of plumbing contexts through tendermint. I
attempted to find all goroutines in the production code (non-test) and
made sure that these threads would exit when their contexts were
canceled, and I believe this PR does that.
This is a very small change, but removes a method from the
`service.Service` interface (a win!) and forces callers to explicitly
pass loggers in to objects during construction rather than (later)
injecting them. There's not a real need for this kind of lazy
construction of loggers, and I think a decent potential for confusion
for mutable loggers.
The main concern I have is that this changes the constructor API for
ABCI clients. I think this is fine, and I suspect that as we plumb
contexts through, and make changes to the RPC services there'll be a
number of similar sorts of changes to various (quasi) public
interfaces, which I think we should welcome.
