* feat: throughput limits for replicate, EC shard, and worker-driven moves
VolumeCopy was the only rate-limitable transfer; EC shard copies,
replica creation, and worker-driven moves all ran at whatever the
receiving server's maintenance rate allowed, with no per-operation
control.
- proto: VolumeEcShardsCopyRequest and the balance / ec_balance task
params and configs gain io_byte_per_second; 0 keeps today's behavior
(the volume server's own maintenance rate governs).
- volume server: VolumeEcShardsCopy throttles with one WriteThrottler
per request, shared across the shard, .ecx, .ecj, .vif, and .ecsum
copies so the limit caps the transfer as a whole - the same shape as
VolumeCopy.
- volume_move: ReplicateVolume accepts the limit; EcMoveOptions carries
it through MoveEcShards/CopyAndMountEcShards into the copy request,
with fake-client tests asserting propagation.
- shell: ec.balance gains -ioBytePerSecond; volume.tier.move's
replication top-up honors the command's existing -ioBytePerSecond
instead of running unthrottled.
- worker: balance and ec_balance configs gain io_byte_per_second
(surfaced in the admin config schema), carried through detection and
plugin job parameters into task params and handed to the shared
mover; batch balance jobs inherit the limit from their detection
results.
The limit is per copy stream, so maxParallelization multiplies the
aggregate ceiling.
* worker plugins: expose io_byte_per_second in the plugin config and derive it
The plugin-driven detection path derives its task Config from the
plugin configuration values, and both balance and ec_balance left
IoBytePerSecond at zero there - a configured limit silently reverted
to the server maintenance rate. Both derive functions now read the
field (clamped at zero), and the plugin descriptors expose it with
defaults so the configuration form carries it.
Chris LuandGitHub
4f50c5b0d4